Hi Janek,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł >
> > wrote:
>
>
[ ... ]
> > You get different results for the second tuplet depending on whether the
Dear List,
How to do the "\autochange" between the "treble^8" and treble?
Default setting is treble and bass Clefs, but I want to modify that.
I want to display that: (download link)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8142442/lilypond-user%40gnu.org/between%20treble%20and%20treble%5E8.gif
Best,
Jong
_
Am 22.05.2012 00:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
Hi Urs,
In addition to version control your team may need the concept of a
build token.
The person holding the token has the right to merge in their latest
work and, in so doing, break the project. They also have the
responsibility to leave it in a worki
Hi Harm,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Morley <
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2012/5/21 David Nalesnik :
> > Added as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=838
> >
> > -David
>
> Hi David,
>
> I'm going to approve your snippet.
> I'd prefer to use the "Standalone-snippet"-o
Hi Urs,
In addition to version control your team may need the concept of a
build token.
The person holding the token has the right to merge in their latest
work and, in so doing, break the project. They also have the
responsibility to leave it in a working state before releasing the
token for th
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of this?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
What do you mean by 'status'? It works for me. I've tweaked the
markup to suit my tastes, and have added some additio
2012/5/21 David Nalesnik :
> Added as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=838
>
> -David
Hi David,
I'm going to approve your snippet.
I'd prefer to use the "Standalone-snippet"-option (I changed it this way).
What do you think?
-Harm
___
lilypond
2012/5/21 John McWilliam :
(...)
> The snippet seems to compile without any errors
Well, it returns:
atest-14.ly:757:16: error: unknown escaped string: `\Bkey'
\Bkey
atest-14.ly:757:16: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\Bkey
atest-14.ly:729:8: error: errors
Dear Susan,
thank you for the valuable input.
What you describe is basically what I thought how it works - but didn't
know for sure due to lack of experience.
Especially the aspect of branching is interesting, as I didn't really
have an idea about that.
So what you describe as the intention of
Snippet:
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
r2 r8
<<
\new Voice = "melody" {
\autoBeamOff
\partial 4. c'4.^\markup {Sjung.}
% Rehersal mark A
\mark \default
\slurDown
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
r2 r8
<<
\new Voice = "melody" {
\autoBeamOff
\partial 4. c'4.^\markup {Sjung.}
% Rehersal mark A
\mark \default
\slurDown
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
I'm searching for a way to display A7(#5)
Regards,
\r
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
2012/5/21 Philip Thomas :
>>> Aha, I thought: try adding an invisible barline at the beginning of
>>> bar 5. That works fine to position the volta bracket correctly, but it
>>> also makes the barline at the end of bar 4 invisible also, even when I
>>> add a manual single barline at the end of bar 4
Colin Jesse Kinlund wrote Monday, May 21, 2012 5:06 PM
> Thank you so much for the responses! Trevor’s solution was
> successful (using alignBelowContext).
> I feel like I scoured the manuals for this, and saw nothing of using
> it for this purpose — A.4.3 SATB with aligned contexts
> doesn’t
To David and Nick,
I thank you very much for your kind help.
I have now plenty of new ways to emprove my left fingering notation.
Pierre
2012/5/17 David Kastrup
> Nick Payne writes:
>
> > On 16/05/12 17:43, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> Nick Payne writes:
> >>
> >>> 2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneide
Hi David,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł
> wrote:
>> That's the true LilyPond way: instead of fixing the same thing all the
>> time, write one fix once and for all - kudos! I wish everyone
>> operated this way.
>
> Thank
Hello.
I'm trying to write a tremolo that fills a 4/4 bar. I used the code
below and I got this error message:
Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T&
Drul_array::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
== -1' failed.
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 g } }
Em 5/21/12 3:03 PM, David Nalesnik escreveu:
Sorry to take the Scheme fun out of it... (if this is in fact gives you
what you want!)
That's it!
No need of the Scheme part of the Scheme fun! :)
Thank you very much!
--
http://zepadovani.info
___
lil
Hi again,
> It would be possible to offset both of them, but I think you might be
> better served by approaching the problem from a different angle. You can
> control the relative positioning of stem and note head through
> 'stem-attachment, which is a property of NoteHead. The flag will move
>
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:25 PM, padovani wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> so.. as the flags are now separate objects (2.15.38), I'm having problems
> to move them to the same place that I am moving the stems... if I just
> reproduce the lambda function I am using with Stems with flags, it does n
Hi again,
so.. as the flags are now separate objects (2.15.38), I'm having
problems to move them to the same place that I am moving the stems... if
I just reproduce the lambda function I am using with Stems with flags,
it does not work...
\once \override Stem #'extra-offset =
#(lambd
José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, padovani wrote:
> Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the
> second part of your message.
No problem! I learned something new about ly:stem::calc-direction because
of your email: didn't know that it calculates "ideal" direc
Thank you so much for the responses! Trevor’s solution was successful (using
alignBelowContext).
I feel like I scoured the manuals for this, and saw nothing of using it for
this purpose — A.4.3 SATB with aligned contexts doesn’t really demonstrate why
you’d want to use that construct over the ex
Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the
second part of your message.
Thank you again!
2012/5/21 David Nalesnik
> Hi José,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani wrote:
>
>> Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu:
>>
>>\override Stem #'extra-offs
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani wrote:
> Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu:
>
>\override Stem #'extra-offset =
>> #(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP)
>> '(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25)))
>>
>
> Hello David,
>
> thank you very much!
>
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock
>> wrote:
>> > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
>>
>> I'm not happy with this practice, either.
>
> I eager
Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu:
\override Stem #'extra-offset =
#(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP)
'(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25)))
Hello David,
thank you very much!
Now I see that ly:stem::calc-direction only gives me the standard Stem
direct
>> Aha, I thought: try adding an invisible barline at the beginning of
>> bar 5. That works fine to position the volta bracket correctly, but it
>> also makes the barline at the end of bar 4 invisible also, even when I
>> add a manual single barline at the end of bar 4. (See Example B
>> below.)
Hello,
I'm dealing with special noteheads I've designed and I need to move the
stem and the flag differently if stem direction is up or down.
I would like to create a guile lisp clause that sets the extra-offset
value accordingly to the Stem position.
I was trying this, but it does not work
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, padovani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm dealing with special noteheads I've designed and I need to move the
> stem and the flag differently if stem direction is up or down.
>
> I would like to create a guile lisp clause that sets the extra-offset
> value accordi
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Susan Dittmar wrote:
> One thing you will have to think about is check-in policy though. I
> personally like to check in very often, but that means the checked in
> version might not compile, let alone be in a state acceptable to use.
> I guess for truely col
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 16:18:16 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Orm Finnendahl:
> The example for neo-modern in the documentation actually is an
> excellent example for a situation where the musician has to ask about
> the second fis because it's not obvious if the accidental has been
> accidentally fo
Thanks, that was it.
OK, it# in the docs, but I had to re-read it three times until I got it :-(
Best
Urs
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
"Janek Warchoł" schrieb:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> I'm stuck :-(
>
> Why doesn
2012/5/21 Susan Dittmar :
> Dear Urs,
>
> I just have one thing to add to the discussion: *do* use one of the
> repository tools! No matter which one (you had some suggestions already),
> but do use one!
I'd like to add just one more idea. You could use a CVS such as Git,
and maybe you'd want to k
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:58:14 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
> Question is: is neo-modern used and appreciated as it works right now
> and do we indeed need a "contemporary" style, or should neo-modern
> behave like Orm describes?
I would opt for that. The only situation, I know
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> I'm stuck :-(
>
> Why doesn't this work as I expect? .
>
> \version "2.15.36"
> \time 4/4
> \set Timing. BeatStructure = #'(1 1 1 1)
> c8 c c c c c c c
you have to clear BeamExceptions if i remember correctly.
HTH,
Janek
_
Orm Finnendahl writes:
>> \accidentalStyle "neo-modern" does not match your requirements?
>
> its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
> calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
> accidental (even if it's stated in the foreword).
Question is: is
I'm stuck :-(
Why doesn't this work as I expect? .
\version "2.15.36"
\time 4/4
\set Timing. BeatStructure = #'(1 1 1 1)
c8 c c c c c c c
This should result in four groups of two beamed notes, isn't it?
But I always get two groups of four notes.
The same problem with 3/4, but with 5/4 I can do
On 2012-05-21 13:09, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
My suggestion for the name of this style would be "contemporary"
That only works from our particular point of view. If someone runs
Lilypond sometime far into the distant future or in the distant past,
they wouldn't see it as contemporary. I'd suggest
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:37:33 Uhr (+0200) schrieb David Kastrup:
>
> \accidentalStyle "neo-modern" does not match your requirements?
>
its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
accidental (even
Orm Finnendahl writes:
> Hi,
>
> for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary
> music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary
> composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra
> work in every score implementing the accidentals
Hi,
for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary
music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary
composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra
work in every score implementing the accidentals explicitely although
its behaviour c
Dear Urs,
I just have one thing to add to the discussion: *do* use one of the
repository tools! No matter which one (you had some suggestions already),
but do use one! I do so since about 10 years (csv originally, converted to
subversion some -- more than 6, I think -- years ago), and even for
per
"Philip Thomas" writes:
> Hi fellow-users,
>
>
>
> I don’t know whether I have one joint problem or two separate ones. My
> apologies for running them together in the same post if they are in
> reality separate issues.
>
>
>
> I’m putting together a vocal (choir) score in the key of G major w
Hi fellow-users,
I don't know whether I have one joint problem or two separate ones. My
apologies for running them together in the same post if they are in reality
separate issues.
I'm putting together a vocal (choir) score in the key of G major which has
five repeated sections. I tried inp
45 matches
Mail list logo
