On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 2/26/12 2:10 AM, "David Bobroff" wrote:
>
>>I'm looking for a way to achieve this beaming pattern:
>>
>>http://notendur.centrum.is/~bobroff/lily/complex-beam.png
>>
>>Can LilyPond do this? I suspect I'll have to use a combination of
>>su
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:02:14AM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 2/26/12 2:10 AM, "David Bobroff" wrote:
>
> >I'm looking for a way to achieve this beaming pattern:
> >
> >http://notendur.centrum.is/~bobroff/lily/complex-beam.png
> >
> >Can LilyPond do this? I suspect I'll have to use a combi
This code demonstrates how to use the hyphen glyph
of a fraktur font, but obviously it breaks lilypond for
general use. But as there seems to be no reasonable
solution, it might be valuable for other people as long as
no proper solution is implemented.
cu,
Knut
>From cf54a3b00ed03070c3a4739b0c1d
On 2/26/12 2:10 AM, "David Bobroff" wrote:
>I'm looking for a way to achieve this beaming pattern:
>
>http://notendur.centrum.is/~bobroff/lily/complex-beam.png
>
>Can LilyPond do this? I suspect I'll have to use a combination of
>subdivideBeams and stemRightBeamCount/stemLeftBeamCount. Is there
Forgot to reply to all:
Hi Harm,
>
>
> cross-staff-chords---beaming-problems-workaround.txt:cross-staff-chords---beaming-problems-workaround.ly:39
> :11:
> warning: ignoring too many clashing note columns
> --As expected! Same warnings as in 12.2.3
>
I realize that it's not necessary for an upda
lilypond-7 wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:55:24PM -0800, -Eluze wrote:
>>
>> the simultaneity signs in the StaffGroup are missing - try this:
>>
>> \new StaffGroup <<
>> \relative c' {
>> e1
>> e1
>> <<
>> { < b d g>1\fermata }
>> \new Staff {
>> \overr
Hi Phil,
this step from CG 7.7 Updating LSR to a new version
"2. Copy relevant snippets (i.e., snippets whose version is equal to
or less than the new version of LilyPond) from
‘Documentation/snippets/new/’ into the tarball."
is outstanding.
I don't know how to extract them other than manually and
On 26 Feb 2012, at 20:06, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> this is almost cute enough for a bounty:
>>
>> It works exactly as I had hoped.
>> What's a reasonable fee for your effort?
>
> Hard to say. Writing this up now was good for about €18 (5 minutes was
> a bit boastful as an estimate, even though
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Morley <
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> many thanks for this and for your and David Kastrup's work on this
> intractable filtering-parts-from-the-command-line.ly file.
>
My pleasure! So, are there any other snippets that need looking
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:55:24PM -0800, -Eluze wrote:
>
> the simultaneity signs in the StaffGroup are missing - try this:
>
> \new StaffGroup <<
> \relative c' {
> e1
> e1
> <<
> { < b d g>1\fermata }
> \new Staff {
> \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil =
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> this is almost cute enough for a bounty:
>
> It works exactly as I had hoped.
> What's a reasonable fee for your effort?
Hard to say. Writing this up now was good for about €18 (5 minutes was
a bit boastful as an estimate, even though this went through
Hi David,
> this is almost cute enough for a bounty:
It works exactly as I had hoped.
What's a reasonable fee for your effort?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi David,
2012/2/26 David Nalesnik :
> This seems to do the trick:
[...]
many thanks for this and for your and David Kastrup's work on this
intractable filtering-parts-from-the-command-line.ly file.
Best,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypon
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Morley <
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in repeat-with-upbeat-and-different-durations-in-the-alternatives.ly (
> = http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=490 ) I want to avoid the
> warning, but I can't find a proper fix. All I can t
Hi,
in the preventing-final-mark-from-removing-final-tuplet.ly (=
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=705 ) I noticed a bug with \set
tupletFullLength and \mark while using 2.14.2 and 2.15.30.
log:
warning: Found infinity or nan in output. Substituting 0.0
Made a bug-report about it.
For now I
Hi,
in repeat-with-upbeat-and-different-durations-in-the-alternatives.ly (
= http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=490 ) I want to avoid the
warning, but I can't find a proper fix. All I can think of is crude
and ugly:
{
\repeat volta 2 {
\partial 4
e'4
c'2
}
\alternative {
{
f'
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hello again,
>
> So I was able to work out the following function:
>
> \version "2.15.29"
>
> tsFunky =
> #(define-music-function
> (parser location numerNum denomNote)
> (string? string?)
> #{
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil =
> #ly
Michael Hendry writes:
> I find it hard when groping in the dark with two unfamiliar languages
> to pin down which of them is not doing what I want it to do, and to
> distinguish what might be a fault in the implementation of the
> languages from a (much more likely) fault in my code.
The error
Hello again,
So I was able to work out the following function:
\version "2.15.29"
tsFunky =
#(define-music-function
(parser location numerNum denomNote)
(string? string?)
#{
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override Staff.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Hendry"
I'm probably not even looking in the right place, but I wouldn't know how
to
start "tracking the development version".
If you go to http://lilypond.org/ you'll see the latest released development
version is 2.15.30. Download and install
I have added this to the bug tracker as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2356
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: hhpmusic
To: Neil Puttock
Cc: lilypond-user
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 1:28 PM
Subject: Re:Re: Re: Re: Re: problem still exists
Hello all,
I am engraving a piece which includes a time signature of 7 dotted sixteenths
(displayed as a note, not a number). I found the LSR snippet to make the
denominator a note, but I'm having difficulty getting the correct output. Any
assistance — especially in the form of existing Scheme
I'm looking for a way to achieve this beaming pattern:
http://notendur.centrum.is/~bobroff/lily/complex-beam.png
Can LilyPond do this? I suspect I'll have to use a combination of
subdivideBeams and stemRightBeamCount/stemLeftBeamCount. Is there a
known solution?
Thanks,
David
___
Thank you. Then, how to report this bug? My score is too big to find the real
culprit, but this problem is a regression since 2.15.xx (I can't remember).
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailm
2012/2/25 Helge Kruse :
> that looks great. I can control the exact position of the beam.
But default beam slopes are still getting confused by staff changes .
See examples.
The upper beam slope is the reverse of what one expects, when compared
to the lower one.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spai
David Kastrup wrote:
>
>
> Oh, the $(if ) method can perfectly handle variables which are a book.
> It is just LilyPond that does not accept a book identifier at top
> level. So you have to write something like
> \book { $(if includeGuitar GuitarBook) }
> and rely on an empty book not having a
26 matches
Mail list logo
