I'm working with a multi-score lilypond file.
I'd like to be able to set arbitrary filenames for each midi, instead of having
lilypond derive the midi filenames from the .ly filename.
Am I not searching in the right places, or maybe I should log this as a feature
request?
Thx, Javier Ruiz__
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
>> I'm guessing both of these are possible, but I don't know quite the
>> right knobs to tweak to modify a voice in this way. And I imagine it
>> must be a fairly common problem, so surely someone else has already
>> done somet
Hi Evan,
> I'm guessing both of these are possible, but I don't know quite the
> right knobs to tweak to modify a voice in this way. And I imagine it
> must be a fairly common problem, so surely someone else has already
> done something like this?
Instantiate the voices explicitly:
\relative g'
Hi everyone, I'm new to lilypond, so sorry if this is a simple
question, but I wasn't able to find an answer in either the
documentation or the archives.
I have a piece which is mostly monophonic, but occasionally has
another voice. Up until now I have been using << \\ >> to split the
voices as n
>> Here are the messages I get in the console:
>>
>> warning: no PostScript font name for font
>> `/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/10x20.pcf.gz'
>
> It's improbable that you want to use an X11 font with LilyPond.
To be more precise: LilyPond only handles outline fonts. A proper
filter to ensure t
On 14 August 2011 22:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> When did lyricMelismaAlignment begin to require an exact integer?
> My 2.13 scores with #-0.9 as the setting are throwing errors in 2.15.8 —
> feature or bug?
Where are you setting it? If it's inside a \layout block, then we've
recently introd
Hello all,
When did lyricMelismaAlignment begin to require an exact integer?
My 2.13 scores with #-0.9 as the setting are throwing errors in 2.15.8 —
feature or bug?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu
Hy all,
I'm trying to quote some music inside ossia staves. It's working, despite the
fact that the \override commands doesn't seems to get quoted.
As I'm doing contemporary music, I use a lot of tweaking things with overrides.
How can I quote music handling this alterations?
Best
Alexandre
__
Am 2011-08-14 um 14:22 schrieb Jean-Alexis Montignies:
I've been compiling lilypond with fink (MacOS X 10.6) for two
years. Since a update about one year ago I didn't track down, I have
some trouble with some unicode characters (in that case 0x266D which
is a flat sign).
The binary versio
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 12:00 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> So the defaults should look like [8 8 8 8 8 8] and even [8. 16 8 8 8
> 8],
> but 4. [8 8 8] is wrong and needs to be 4. 8 [8 8] instead.
>
> 6/8 would have [8 8 8] [8 8 8], [8. 16 8] [8 8 8] and 4. [8 8 8],
> respectively.
>
On 14 Aug 2011, at 15:55, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> IMO this *is* a bug for default beaming. The engraving sources (Stone,
> Read, Gould) are pretty united in saying that you should not beam 3/4 to
> look like 6/8.
>
> I'm not sure what's going on with the Chopin and Brahms beaming that looks
> l
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 8/13/11 2:55 PM, "Bertrand Bordage" wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> (I don't know if we can call this a defect, so I don't send it to
>> bug-lilypond
>> for the moment)
>>
>> I am working on a 3/4 score with this rhythmical pattern in the beginning :
>> "4. 8 8 8".
>
On 8/13/11 2:55 PM, "Bertrand Bordage" wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> (I don't know if we can call this a defect, so I don't send it to bug-lilypond
> for the moment)
>
> I am working on a 3/4 score with this rhythmical pattern in the beginning :
> "4. 8 8 8".
> It is repeated five times, but the re
Hi,
I've been compiling lilypond with fink (MacOS X 10.6) for two years. Since a
update about one year ago I didn't track down, I have some trouble with some
unicode characters (in that case 0x266D which is a flat sign).
The binary version works with the same chars.
The advantage of the fink c
Am 14.08.2011 um 12:52 schrieb Neil Puttock:
> I don't think you need a new engraver for this; overriding the stencil
> should suffice since the time signature fraction is passed to
> TimeSignature via the property 'fraction:
Of course, I came via the scheme-engraver-street and didn't saw the simp
On 14 August 2011 08:48, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> I will optimize and use overrides for this engraver - the markup is a first
> shot. If I have time and/or a need, I will look for another context than
> Dynamics.
I don't think you need a new engraver for this; overriding the stencil
should suffi
Am 2011-08-09 um 21:39 schrieb Matthew Collett:
LilyPond 2.14.x (tested .0 and .2) on OSX-Intel ignores my font
settings like
\paper {
#(define fonts (make-pango-font-tree "TeX Gyre Schola" "LMSans10"
"LMTypewriter10 Regular" (/ 14 20)))
}
The font names are exactly the same as I get wit
Ok, I'll keep LilyPond's default beaming since it's the usual notation.
Thanks!
Bertrand
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thank you Neil,
now I created the following time-signature engraver:
--snip--
\version "2.14.2"
#(define-public orff (lambda (context)
(let ((time-signature '())
(last-fraction #f))
`((process-music
. ,(lambda (trans)
19 matches
Mail list logo
