Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

> "James" == James Harkins writes: James> At Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:33:48 +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: >> I just do C-c C-c and then View --- xpdf then runs in the >> background. C-c C-c again reruns lilypond, hit R in the Xpdf >> window and it refreshes. Done! James> Hm... no, that's not happen

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

At Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:33:48 +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: > I just do C-c C-c and then View --- xpdf then runs in the background. > C-c C-c again reruns lilypond, hit R in the Xpdf window and it > refreshes. Done! Thanks for the tips, will play with it some more. I'm actually leaning back toward Em

Re: Snippet: Tie does not appear

On 21/06/11 12:59, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: \version "2.12.3" \include "english.ly " \score { << \new Staff = "guitar" { \clef "treble_8" \time 4/4 % guitar m01 << { s2. g'8. [e,16~] } \\ { r2. f8 [b8] } >> % guitar m02 <<

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

> "James" == James Harkins writes: James> At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:54 -0400, Christopher R. Maden wrote: >> What OS are you using? >> >> I use Evince under Ubuntu/GNOME to view PDF files, and it >> automatically notes when the file has changed. When I recompile in >> Emacs, Evince refreshe

Re: Snippet: Tie does not appear

On 11-06-20 08:59 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: Snippet: Tie does not appear Why does the tie between the two low E naturals that I have indicated in the snippet below not appear in the notation? Thanks. \version "2.12.3" \include "english.ly " \score { << \new Staff = "g

Re: Snippet: Tie does not appear

At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:59:24 -0500, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: > Why does the tie between the two low E naturals that I have > indicated in the snippet below not appear in the notation? The e's are in different voices. I'm fairly new to ly, but it didn't take me too long to find that ties are not allo

Re: Snippet: Tie does not appear

Ivan Kuznetsov gmail.com> writes: > Why does the tie between the two low E naturals that I have indicated in > the snippet below not appear in the notation? The two low E naturals are in different voices. Lilypond only looks within the same voice to complete ties, because conceptually the ti

Snippet: Tie does not appear

Snippet: Tie does not appear Why does the tie between the two low E naturals that I have indicated in the snippet below not appear in the notation? Thanks. \version "2.12.3" \include "english.ly" \score { << \new Staff = "guitar" { \clef "treble_8" \time 4/4 % guitar m0

Re: orchestra and individual parts

Marc Mouries mouries.net> writes: > > The common templates for orchestral music require to remove comments when > using separate files. (ex: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=359). > I am using the following structure that does not require commenting and > un-commenting the score parts but thi

orchestra and individual parts

The common templates for orchestral music require to remove comments when using separate files. (ex: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=359). I am using the following structure that does not require commenting and un-commenting the score parts but this requires to create one more file for each pa

Re: Cued notes with partCombine

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:41:11 -0700, Garrett Fitzgerald wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 18:45, Keith OHara wrote: << \clarinetOne // \clarinetTwo >> Oops. << \clarinetOne \\ \clarinetTwo >> That syntax didn't work for me for some reason, but I'm pretty sure I do want the partCombine effec

Re: Cued notes with partCombine

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 18:45, Keith OHara wrote: > If you are printing two parts on one staff, then you probably don't want > partCombine, but rather two voices > << \clarinetOne // \clarinetTwo >> > but then you have to insert \voiceOne and \voiceTwo as apporpriate into the > two > clarinet mu

Re: Cued notes with partCombine

Garrett Fitzgerald gmail.com> writes: > > Using partCombine, it went fairly well, except for the cued piccolo solo. partCombine cannot handle more than two Voices, so the cued notes in their separate CueVoice mess up the part combining. Usually, you put the cues in the parts, but remove them

Re: Changing StaffSymbol's line-count

Fabian Binz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > some time ago I asked how to embed a RhythmicStaff into a "normal" Staff. > I > was pointed to \improvisationOn/Off, which worked for the moment. > Unfortunately, now I really want to have some kind of RhythmicStaff inside > a > normal Staff, so I again tr

Changing StaffSymbol's line-count

Hi, some time ago I asked how to embed a RhythmicStaff into a "normal" Staff. I was pointed to \improvisationOn/Off, which worked for the moment. Unfortunately, now I really want to have some kind of RhythmicStaff inside a normal Staff, so I again tried to find a way to do it and found the Sta

Cued notes with partCombine

I was trying to re-set the first clarinet part for Fucik's Florentiner March from a copied, enlarged marching band part. Using partCombine, it went fairly well, except for the cued piccolo solo. Can anyone clue me in on what I did wrong here? It works fine as I have it below, but if I move the comm

Re: Sub-music

"Phil Holmes" writes: >> If you just click on the image of the old and new snippet, you'll >> see the same code, but in the LSR 764, there is a link to a >> directory where you can download the last version. >> ( http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/extractMusic/ ) >> A lot of features have been adde

Re: Semantics of Lilypond syntax highlighting

On 20 Jun 2011, at 19:00, Garrett Fitzgerald wrote: > I usually use the emacs tool to write lilypond code, but I use Notepad++ for > the rest of my editing. I'm trying to do a lilypond UDL for the Zenburn > scheme I'm currently using (http://victorgavin.co.uk/zenburn/), but I'm > having troubl

Re: Sub-music

I've put those updates into the old snippet (http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=542). If you're happy with that, the new one can be deleted, I think. That's perfect, thank you. New snippet (764) deleted. Gilles ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Polymetric music and page breaks

- Original Message - From: "Andrea La Rose" To: Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 5:09 PM Subject: Re: Polymetric music and page breaks Dear Collective Wisdom, I'm at it again and trying new things. It looks promising, but still not working right. I looked at this snippet again: http://

Semantics of Lilypond syntax highlighting

I usually use the emacs tool to write lilypond code, but I use Notepad++ for the rest of my editing. I'm trying to do a lilypond UDL for the Zenburn scheme I'm currently using (http://victorgavin.co.uk/zenburn/), but I'm having trouble matching a couple of the items up. Working off the list from li

Re: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font

On 20 June 2011 17:47, Jon Toohill wrote: > > Whoops, I wrote that backwards. The older font (the one I want) is on > the right, whereas the newer font that I'm seeing in 2.14 is on the > left. Sorry for the confusion. > > And, in retrospect, I'm not seeing the problem on Linux. In that case, > it

Re: Polymetric music and page breaks

Dear Collective Wisdom, I'm at it again and trying new things. It looks promising, but still not working right. I looked at this snippet again: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/snippets/rhythms#printing-music-with-different-time-signatures And realized I missed this little tidbit: gl

Re: Pitch-bent note's release-phase

Richard Sabey wrote: > Since sending my initial enquiry to this list I have > indeed written an app which confirmed to me what you say. Right. I also have a file that shows Timidity will share the tuning of a note even between channels, so that F and F# come out the same in meantones. I've upd

Re: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font

I think it's a bug that happens only in latest MacOS/Darwin release. You could downgrade MacOS to fix the problem. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font

- Original Message - From: "Xavier Scheuer" To: "Jon Toohill" Cc: Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 4:28 PM Subject: Re: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font On 20 June 2011 16:11, Jon Toohill wrote: Hi all, I noticed that since upgrading to 2.14, the default font for lyrics has changed. I b

Re: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font

On 20 June 2011 16:11, Jon Toohill wrote: > > Hi all, > > I noticed that since upgrading to 2.14, the default font for lyrics has > changed. I built both versions on Mac OSX 10.6.7, and compiled the same > input file for both. I tried editing font.scm to use "Century Schoolbook > L,serif" and rebu

Re: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font

- Original Message - From: "Jon Toohill" To: Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 3:11 PM Subject: Reverting to the 2.13.46 font Hi all, I noticed that since upgrading to 2.14, the default font for lyrics has changed. I built both versions on Mac OSX 10.6.7, and compiled the same input file

Reverting to the 2.13.46 font

Hi all, I noticed that since upgrading to 2.14, the default font for lyrics has changed. I built both versions on Mac OSX 10.6.7, and compiled the same input file for both. I tried editing font.scm to use "Century Schoolbook L,serif" and rebuilding from source, to no avail. The typeface is stil

RE: Pitch-bent note's release-phase

Hello, Graham, and thank you for responding. Since sending my initial enquiry to this list I have indeed written an app which confirmed to me what you say. Thanks also for that Python app. I plumped for your Python v.3.2 version and installed Python v.3.2 accordingly. >There is a problem, in

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, James Harkins wrote: > At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400, > Brett McCoy wrote: >> I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the >> emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think >> I prefer using Frescobaldi just because

Re: Sub-music

-- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: "Gilles" To: ; "Phil Holmes" Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:22 PM Subject: Re: Sub-music To get the last version and get documentations about the function extractMusic, please follow this link : http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400, Brett McCoy wrote: > I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the > emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think > I prefer using Frescobaldi just because it has more music-related > features than emacs... Oh, right

Re: Sub-music

- Original Message - From: "Gilles" To: ; "Phil Holmes" Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:22 PM Subject: Re: Sub-music To get the last version and get documentations about the function extractMusic, please follow this link : http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=764 [This snippet

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:54 -0400, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > What OS are you using? > > I use Evince under Ubuntu/GNOME to view PDF files, and it automatically > notes when the file has changed. When I recompile in Emacs, Evince > refreshes the view momentarily afterward. Evince or one of t

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:28 AM, James Harkins wrote: > I'm in search of the "best of both worlds" ly editor. > > I've gotten started with Frescobaldi. Autocompletion is invaluable, and the > integrated PDF view and help browser is a real lifesaver. > > But, I use Emacs for just about everything

Re: chord name spacing bug?

On 15 juin 2011, at 08:08, Keith OHara wrote: > Jean-Alexis Montignies montignies.info> writes: > >> I have a small example, I have hard >> time finding a shorter one. >> Should I fill this as a bug? >> > > I think so. Do you think this shorter example demonstrates the same bug as > what ca

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

On 06/20/2011 05:28 AM, James Harkins wrote: > - PDF display is treated as a compilation process. To view a new > rendering, I'm forced to close the old viewer window first (!). (Also > a bit of sloppiness in the Emacs variable handling -- since I don't > have xpdf on my system, I changed the appro

Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

I'm in search of the "best of both worlds" ly editor. I've gotten started with Frescobaldi. Autocompletion is invaluable, and the integrated PDF view and help browser is a real lifesaver. But, I use Emacs for just about everything else. So I had a look at LilyPond mode. + Documentation is avai

Re: Dilemma with spacer rest and cross-staff polyphony.

On 20 June 2011 01:20, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote: > > Dear Xavier, > Greetings, and many thanks for your solution of code -- and > especially for your explanation. It works beautifully now, and I fully > comprehend! Great, glad I could help! Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer