Re: Tempo Marks

2011-05-15 Thread Adrian Oehm
Hi Xavier Thanks for that - it works fine. When I compiled it I got a message saying something about not understanding the "Staff_collecting_engraver", so I left that out, and it worked fine (when I cleaned up my score block...). What I ended up with was \new Staff = "SA" \with { \con

Re: Tempo Marks

2011-05-15 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 15 May 2011 11:58, Adrian Oehm wrote: > > I'm sure I've read this in the manual somewhere, but cannot re-find it... > > I have a piece of music set for SATB with Organ accompaniment. What > I would like is to have the tempo (metronome) marks printed above both > the SATB line (currently set us

Tempo Marks

2011-05-15 Thread Adrian Oehm
I'm sure I've read this in the manual somewhere, but cannot re-find it... I have a piece of music set for SATB with Organ accompaniment. What I would like is to have the tempo (metronome) marks printed above both the SATB line (currently set using ChoirStaff) and above the Organ line (set with

Re: Glissando no longer printed within graces?

2011-05-15 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 15 May 2011 09:20, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > > […] > > I get a good result in the most recent git. > Cheers, > Mike Right! I just compiled from latest git and got a good result. So apparently it was just a minor bug in this dev version and it has been corrected since. I'm not used to th

Re: align wobbly dynamics and text

2011-05-15 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 14 May 2011 18:55, Marc Mouries wrote: > > I'd like to have the dynamics and text aligned on the same line like > in the score below. > > I tried using \override DynamicLineSpanner #'staff-padding = #2 > but that did not help to align the forte and pianissimo. The lilypond > score looks really

Re: Glissando no longer printed within graces?

2011-05-15 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On May 14, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > Hi, > > Since a few months I am using my own "glissandoGrace" grace-function > to print glissando without starting note (I made this "modified" grace > invisible, but the glissando visible). > > Unfortunately I see that with 2.13.61 a glissand