Hi Carl, many thanks,
I will have to learn scheme, tis obvious :-(
But this seems to be the idea. I will eventually really need your help...
A nice week-end to all,
Francois
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe wrote:
> I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one simplistic example of C
> seems erroneous. Isn't the idea of the notes printed at the same moment to
> show that they need to be sung at the same moment if you see what I mean? Yes
> I am sure th
Hi James,
To beam or not to beam should be about rhythmic grouping. Stem direction
tells which note heads go with which voice. I think C is better for both
vocalists and pianists. With or without beaming, it's clearer what's going
on, especially with regard to which voices have the sharped or nat
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Neil Puttock [mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 22:50
To: James Lowe
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to print 2 rehearsal marks above and below same bar line
On 16 December 2010 11:29, James wrote:
> I suppose I should also add
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Michael Ellis
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 21:50
To: Keith OHara
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Odd output
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara wro
On 16 December 2010 11:29, James wrote:
> I suppose I should also add that to the LSR snippet. For the kind of music I
> engrave the method for extra offset is fine pretty much, and much less
> complicated than adding a second voice and then a \layout {} function.
What kind of music are you engr
Alexander Kobel wrote:
>
>
> I think to remember that
> systems-per-page did not work somewhere in the 2.13. branch, but it
> should work again in the most recent version.
>
it still does not work - see attached pdf for
\version "2.13.43"
\paper { systems-per-page = #9 }
\repeat unfold 50
On 12/17/10 2:40 PM, "Music Teacher" wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I read these posts, but this doesnt really help in the case of
> analysis after the fonction theory. Minors and Majors arent used in
> this form, instead, the last letter of the main symbol does it (upper
> case=major, lower case=minor).
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
>>
>> Nice.
> It does break the usual rules about horizontal placement, and about when
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes wrote:
The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
Nice.
It does break the usual rules about horizontal placement, and about when to
cancel accidentals in another voice. But, with the beaming to clarify the
timing and linking the
Thanks!
I read these posts, but this doesnt really help in the case of
analysis after the fonction theory. Minors and Majors arent used in
this form, instead, the last letter of the main symbol does it (upper
case=major, lower case=minor).
But there is more. Each symbol is like an elaborated matr
Hello Valentin..Thank you for your encourageing..I have added the soluting
to the snippets..:)
2010/12/17 James
> Hello,
>
>
> On 17/12/2010 08:50, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
>
>> maybe you should add it. It was your soultion..And i'm new at this..:)
>>
>
> It isn't hard and it really helps the rest
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Bravo!
> My one comment is that the q=60 marking looks a little off & is different
> than some commensurate markings in the docs. Otherwise, sweet!
I noticed this the other day, and I was prompted to open this tracker issue:
http://code.goo
On 12/17/10 8:58 AM, "Music Teacher" wrote:
> Hi,
> This mail never arrived, it seems. So i send it again...
>
> I would like to know if there is a way (i search quite a while
> whithout success) to write chords according to Riemann's Function
> Theory. In principle, math would do the trick, but
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
>
> which is much more factional, informational and more
> beautiful. Thanks for all the work that has gone
> into it!
I've tried to help impr
On 2010-12-17 16:58, Music Teacher wrote:
Hi,
This mail never arrived, it seems. So i send it again...
Hi, Francois,
it actually arrived - you can check this in the mailing list archives.
I would like to know if there is a way (i search quite a while
whithout success) to write chords accordi
On 2010-12-17 16:20, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I believe those are two different files. At first I was under the same
impression, but upon repeated jostling between the images, I see that the
treble clefs, tempo markings, and taglines are different.
Or are they in fact the same an
Graham Percival writes:
> If you don't like the "martians vaporized our art" thought, then
> consider letting politicians know, and consider voting for political
> parties which favour certain types of copyright reform. But if you
> thought that the road to 2.14 was a long and painful process, y
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:33 PM, James wrote:
> Well my point was with some of our duller Inspirational Headwords, I am
> always on the look out for 'interesting' LilyPond files that we could
> potentially use in the Doc.
Invent something from scratch.
> So thinking if this were something we cou
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> In my non-expert (I am not a lawyer) opinion, the current except on
>> the German page would contravene Canadian copyright law.
>
> It depends on whether the quote makes sense for working with/from. Not
> every
James wrote:
#(ly:set-option 'debug-skylines #t)
Thank you that worked.
(in top-level).
I don't know where i learned it and i don't know if it's documented
at all.
Looks really cool, though :D
I did a quick search in the PDFs from the latest doc build and
couldn't find 'debug-skyli
Hi,
This mail never arrived, it seems. So i send it again...
I would like to know if there is a way (i search quite a while
whithout success) to write chords according to Riemann's Function
Theory. In principle, math would do the trick, but there are some
arguments for a own syntax (have a look at
Mike Solomon wrote Friday, December 17, 2010 3:29 PM
I believe those are two different files. At first
I was under the same impression, but upon repeated
jostling between the images, I see that the treble
clefs, tempo markings, and taglines are different.
They are different. If you blow
Hello
On 17/12/2010 15:09, Graham Percival wrote:
I honestly don't know why people tempt fate like this -- I mean,
Patrick's fibonacci is beautiful! If you like the colours from the
Stockhausen except, well, those are easy to add to Patrick's piece.n
Throw in some cross-staff beams, and you're
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>>
>>> although the German
>>> page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
>>
>> At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
>
> Depends on the le
I believe those are two different files. At first I was under the same
impression, but upon repeated jostling between the images, I see that the
treble clefs, tempo markings, and taglines are different.
Perhaps some sort of document showing the subtle differences would help?
Or are they in fac
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Kobel"
To: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
Cc: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: beautifully reworked wiki page
On 2010-12-17 14:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
http://en.wikip
Hello,
On 17/12/2010 08:50, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
maybe you should add it. It was your soultion..And i'm new at this..:)
It isn't hard and it really helps the rest of us if others like yourself
can add their own (or other's) snippets.
See:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/html/contributing.html
On 2010-12-17 14:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
which is much more factional, informational and more
beautiful. Thanks for all the work that has gone
into it!
Beautiful. But really stunning is the fact th
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> although the German
>> page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
>
> At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
Depends on the legal jurisdiction -- which, of course, i
Jan
On 17/12/2010 00:29, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2010/12/16 James:
Is it easy to display those nice lines around the bounding boxes by
adding a \paper { } variable?
I can only find
\paper { annotate-spacing = ##t }
Which gives the arrows/values.
you have to use this:
#(ly:set-option 'debug-skyli
Hello,
On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
although the German
page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists
On Fri 17 Dec 2010, 14:00 Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From:
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:48 PM
> Subject: Re: How to print less measures to each system
>
>
> >Is it that I can only do this manually?
> >
>
> It seemed that if you knew you
On 2010-12-17 14:19, Akira wrote:
For instance, now I have 12 measures per each system (line) and 8
systems per one page.
The music which I want should have 8 measures per each system and 12
systems per one page. [...]
\paper{
#(define page-breaking ly:optimal-breaking)
systems-per-page =11
}
Bravo!
My one comment is that the q=60 marking looks a little off & is different than
some commensurate markings in the docs. Otherwise, sweet!
MS
On Dec 17, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Li
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: How to print less measures to each system
Is it that I can only do this manually?
It seemed that if you knew you wanted a fixed number of measures per
horizontal line, then usin
Is it that I can only do this manually?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: "Akira"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:19 PM
Subject: How to print less measures to each system
I would like to increase the number of systems per one page and
decrease the number of measure per one system.
Because by this way I can widen each measur
I would like to increase the number of systems per one page and
decrease the number of measure per one system.
Because by this way I can widen each measure, and performers can
easily read figure the rhythms out.
For instance, now I have 12 measures per each system (line) and 8
systems per one page
Hi,
Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
which is much more factional, informational and more
beautiful. Thanks for all the work that has gone
into it!
I'm kind of hoping that the same would be done for
the German and Dutch pages -- although the G
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
From: "Marco Correia" gmail.com>
>
> \include "english.ly"
> {
> \clef treble
> \time 4/4
> <<
> { fs'4 }
> \\
> { f'4 } >>
>>>
This w
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> From: "Marco Correia" gmail.com>
> >
> > \include "english.ly"
> > {
> > \clef treble
> > \time 4/4
> > <<
> > { fs'4 }
> > \\
> > { f'4 } >>
> >>>
>
> This was one of the first issues I raised, in June this year. I think it
> was my first bug report:
>
Hi Marek,
maybe you should add it. It was your soultion..And i'm new at this..:)
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
> > in Slovak language we have similar prepositions and I like the way
> lilypond
> > does it if I wou
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
> in Slovak language we have similar prepositions and I like the way lilypond
> does it if I would write s_to -- bom. But if you don't like it, you could
> shift particular sylable to the left with
> \once \override LyricText #'X-offset = #-2.4
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
