On 26 November 2010 16:02, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Just read http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/us/terms.html>:
It is not that easy (see below).
On 26 November 2010 16:05, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> However, as James pointed out, the Apple AppStore® is (deliberately)
> incompatible with the
On 26/11/10 13:23, Feifan Zhou wrote:
What was the reason for releasing Lilypond under the GPL rather than the LGPL?
In keeping with Lilypond's philosopy of providing beautiful sheet music
to everyone, I would believe that the LGPL would have been a better choice.
But I'm not here to argue my po
Why not have a look at www.omet.ca and then send me a note? Sounds like omet
has the beginnings or 'proof-of-concept' of what you are trying to do - the
dojo toolkit has tons of stuff that can be used for this type of app.
-M
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Feifan Zhou wrote:
> What was the rea
forwarding to group list..
---
Dear James,
I upgraded to 2.13.40 version and followed your instructions: Lilypond
gave out some errors, but the output was just fine. I'm trying now to
adjust it to my own file, I am almost sure it will work.
Thank you so much, this is going to solve my problem,
> However, the GPLv3 does not allow me to use Lilypond
> in a commercial application.
>
> So, I'm asking for advice. Considering the license over Lilypond,
> which I have no intention of breaking, what should I do about my conundrum?
> Are there alternatives that produce output of the same
> quali
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, craigbakalian
wrote:
> Why don't you make your app free? What is the point of charging money
> for anything, especially in the USA where money is taking on a whole new
> meaning?
Could we please stop mixing up "commercial" and "proprietary"
software? Releasing a
David Kastrup writes:
> "James Lowe" writes:
>
>> he mentioned iPad and so I assume he is (obliquely) referring to this kind
>> of thing:
>>
>> http://www.fsf.org/news/2010-05-app-store-compliance
>>
>> (there is another link within that thread that covers GPL not
>> compatible with App Store)
Is it possible to create an additional, third level structure element of the
book?
According to the manual, there is the top level \book, the second level is
the \bookpart and then, it is the \score directly. However, I would need a
third level which would be subsection of the \bookpart. Is this
"James Lowe" writes:
> he mentioned iPad and so I assume he is (obliquely) referring to this kind of
> thing:
>
> http://www.fsf.org/news/2010-05-app-store-compliance
>
> (there is another link within that thread that covers GPL not
> compatible with App Store)
>
> I don't pretend to understand
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of David
Kastrup
Sent: Fri 11/26/2010 13:15
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GPL vs. LGPL
Feifan Zhou writes:
> What was the reason for releasing Lilypond under the GPL rather than
>
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Jayaratna
Sent: Sun 11/21/2010 13:01
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Multi-page markup: programming error
Dear members,
this seems to be something that has not been discussed yet.
I
Hi Feifan,
Why don't you make your app free? What is the point of charging money
for anything, especially in the USA where money is taking on a whole new
meaning?
Craig Bakalian
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 08:05 -0500, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> From: Feifan Zhou
> Subject: GPL vs. LGPL
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jan Warchoł <
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/25 Steve Yegge
>
>> I bit the bullet and went through all 100-odd guitar music publications
>> I've
>> collected over the years, from publishers around the world on every
>> continent,
>> across mul
Feifan Zhou writes:
> What was the reason for releasing Lilypond under the GPL rather than
> the LGPL?
Because it is not a library? Have you _read_ the terms of the LGPL?
They don't make much sense for the Lilypond code base and don't actually
offer anything more than the GPL (other than compli
What was the reason for releasing Lilypond under the GPL rather than the LGPL?
In keeping with Lilypond's philosopy of providing beautiful sheet music
to everyone, I would believe that the LGPL would have been a better choice.
But I'm not here to argue my point; it would be me against the communi
Am Freitag, 26. November 2010, um 11:08:36 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> +1. I use a lot of choral scores, and I don't believe I've ever seen the
> correct clef for tenors, which is a treble clef and octave down.
Looking at my large collection of vocal scores, it appears that while most
older scores
+1. I use a lot of choral scores, and I don't believe I've ever seen the
correct clef for tenors, which is a treble clef and octave down. I insist on
using it, because it's right. Reckon the old typesetters didn't have the
correct symbol and so simply didn't bother.
--
Phil Holmes
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
