Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

2010-10-18 Thread Cordilow
In most music I see out there, I've noticed that related dynamics (and often markup) are usually parallel (such that if you drew a horizontal line, it would meet both at the same vertical position). In fact, I'm hard pressed to think of a situation where they're not in the sheet music I've seen pu

Re: Crescendo or decrescendo on one note

2010-10-18 Thread Cordilow
Thanks! Works well, even if it takes a little time. James Bailey-4 wrote: > > I would do this: > soprano = \relative c'' { > … > c4. d8 es4. as,8| %11 > b2 r4 > } > sopranoDynamics = { > … > s2 s4\< s8\! s\>| %11 > % or possibly > % s2 s8\<

Re: Crescendo or decrescendo on one note

2010-10-18 Thread James Bailey
On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Cordilow wrote: > > I have a situation where there are only two notes considered, side by side. > One has a crescendo and the next has a decrescendo. Any ideas on how to do > this? I looked at the documentation and could only find something doable > with a three note

Crescendo or decrescendo on one note

2010-10-18 Thread Cordilow
I have a situation where there are only two notes considered, side by side. One has a crescendo and the next has a decrescendo. Any ideas on how to do this? I looked at the documentation and could only find something doable with a three note combination, or with both on a single note (as with \esp

Re: orchestral template, please comment (horn transposition)

2010-10-18 Thread David Santamauro
Hi Tim, On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:09:37 -0700 Tim Reeves wrote: > > > > There is also a discrepancy between the transposition direction > > (down 5th or up 4th). Some scores actually place an ambitus-sort-of > > note at the beginning of the horn staff to indicate the > > transposition direction.

Re: help with moving dynamic marks needed

2010-10-18 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 18 October 2010 20:53, Vicente Solsona wrote: > > Janek, note that this line in your code raises an error: > >> fis4 d4 d'4-> \tweak #'extra-offset #'( 2 . 4) ^\f d4-> > > extra-offset does not affect spacing and can't be "tweaked" afaik (you'd > have to \override it to work); in your case, you

Re: help with moving dynamic marks needed

2010-10-18 Thread Vicente Solsona
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:43:18 +0200, James wrote: On 18/10/2010 06:21, Xavier Scheuer wrote: 2010/10/18 Janek Warchoł: I've tried doing some things described here, but i don't understand them well enough and it didn't work like i wanted :( The reason is that while the previous example in th

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Mario Moles
Thank's to all! For now i have solved with this example from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-04/msg00422.html and i have hope in the solution the bug \acciaccatura group! Cheers! -- oiram/bin/selom ___ lilypond-user mailing list li

Re: orchestral template, please comment (horn transposition)

2010-10-18 Thread Tim Reeves
> Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:25:50 -0400 > From: David Santamauro > Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment > To: "Trevor Daniels" > Cc: Keith E OHara , lilypond-user@gnu.org > Message-ID: <20101018062550.370d4...@debussy> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > >

Re: orchestral template, please comment

2010-10-18 Thread Keith E OHara
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:18:52 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" wrote: Shouldn't the music for the Horn in F be printed in D major? I will add a comment "% Key signature is often omitted for horns". As a user, I can easily insert it if I want it. The previous version omitted this key sig (showing off a

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Bernardo Barros
Since LilyPond is a GNU project, FSF could help with that. Including regular donations and feature requests. (just an idea) 2010/10/18 Valentin Villenave : > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Bernardo Barros > wrote: >> What is the procedure to donate money for lilypond and/or feature requests? >>

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: > What is the procedure to donate money for lilypond and/or feature requests? > Through the Free Software Foundation? For now, you don't send money to "the LilyPond project" as a whole, but to a specific developer who has been working on an

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Bernardo Barros
Through the Free Software Foundation? 2010/10/18 Bernardo Barros : > What is the procedure to donate money for lilypond and/or feature requests? > > 2010/10/18 Valentin Villenave : >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bernardo Barros >> wrote: >>> Well, this hack can be a start for a proper implem

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Bernardo Barros
What is the procedure to donate money for lilypond and/or feature requests? 2010/10/18 Valentin Villenave : > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bernardo Barros > wrote: >> Well, this hack can be a start for a proper implementation! Right? > > It is waaay too hackish to be integrated as is. But hav

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: > Well, this hack can be a start for a proper implementation! Right? It is waaay too hackish to be integrated as is. But having this request in the bug-tracker will certainly help. However, the few skilled developers we have are busy working

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Bernardo Barros
Well, this hack can be a start for a proper implementation! Right? 2010/10/18 Valentin Villenave : > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> No, it's not. > > It is, but with a hack: > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=721 > > I've also opened a tracker page about it: > http:/

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Bernardo Barros
Hi Mario, I understand the acciacatura, when I write my sketches I use it too. I think it is not really necessary with LilyPond because the acciacatura has a smaller font size anyway, andthe meaning is very clear in my opinion. The slash sigh is not so important, I can live without it. But, yes,

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > No, it's not. It is, but with a hack: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=721 I've also opened a tracker page about it: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1333 GLHF Valentin ___

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mario Moles wrote Monday, October 18, 2010 12:45 PM In data lunedì 18 ottobre 2010 13:39:12, hai scritto: What does this line through the beams mean This is acciaccatura group in the contemporany composition! This is possible with lilypond? Thank's! No, it's not. Notation Reference 1.2.6 Gr

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread James Bailey
As mentioned frequently on this mailing list, this is a known limitation of lilypond. See the message at: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-04/msg00422.html On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Mario Moles wrote: > In data lunedì 18 ottobre 2010 13:39:12, hai scritto: > > What does th

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread Mario Moles
In data lunedì 18 ottobre 2010 13:39:12, hai scritto: > What does this line through the beams mean This is acciaccatura group in the contemporany composition! This is possible with lilypond? Thank's! -- oiram/bin/selom ___ lilypond-user mailing list lily

Re: \acciaccatura

2010-10-18 Thread James
Hello On 17/10/2010 19:46, Mario Moles wrote: Hi lilyponders! How i can make this graphic option! Regards! What does this line through the beams mean? James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: help with moving dynamic marks needed

2010-10-18 Thread James
Hello, On 18/10/2010 06:21, Xavier Scheuer wrote: 2010/10/18 Janek Warchoł: I've tried doing some things described here, but i don't understand them well enough and it didn't work like i wanted :( The reason is that while the previous example in the documentation *does* move the symbol aroun

Re: orchestral template, please comment

2010-10-18 Thread David Santamauro
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:18:52 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" wrote: > Shouldn't the music for the Horn in F be printed in D major? It is very common for key signatures to be omitted for Horn. As the notes themselves are correct transpositions, it looks ok. There is also a discrepancy between the transp

Re: Re:orchestral template, please comment

2010-10-18 Thread Trevor Daniels
Thanks Phil Keith E OHara wrote Saturday, October 16, 2010 10:27 PM Having heard no complaints, a snippet with these changes is in the LSR awaiting approval. Keith Looks good to me. I'd be happy to use this as the orchestral template in the Learning Manual, but I'm no composer. I'd like