Neil Puttock writes:
> On 27 February 2010 15:03, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> But wouldn't scores in a book use separate engraver instantiations and
>> have separate ambitus for that reason?
>
> Not until Nicolas's commit today.
>
> In any case, it doesn't seem appropriate to use a scheme engraver
Ok, thanks! Now I've understand, how it works!
2010/3/2 Neil Puttock
> On 1 March 2010 09:26, Stefan Thomas
> wrote:
> > Dear community,
> > I try to get two textspanners at the same time.
> > It works fine, but: I can't see the stringendo-Text!
> > What could be the reason?
>
> There's a space
Martin Tarenskeen zonnet.nl> writes:
> Does this mean I have to use two \score sections. One for \midi and onBe
> {} for \layout {} like this? :
>
> \score { \new Staff { \transpose c' c { \guitarMusic} } \midi {} }
> \score { \new Staff { \guitarMusic } \layout {} }
>
> I was hopening for an
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> It's all sorted. See the selected snippets for easy noteheads.
Oh, I see. Good to know people here are more reliable than me :)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
any luck finding this script, I'd like to use it, too
philippe hezaine wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Lilypond uses a separate volume channel, rather than velocity, to
>>> control MIDI dynamics. There's a perl script `ConvertToVeolcity.perl'
>>> that can convert the midi output and add velocity info t
On 2 March 2010 12:18, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I just uploaded a patch in GIT, adding a related comment in
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-fretted-strings#References-for-fretted-strings
+Scores for these instruments should use the @code{"treble_8"} clef
I know that doing \new Score is generally not recommended, but in the
process of helping someone I came across a couple of questions, and
the only solution I could find required me to do \new Score. First,
the goal here is have a score with four separate staves, but an
ambitus that encompas
On 27 February 2010 15:03, David Kastrup wrote:
> But wouldn't scores in a book use separate engraver instantiations and
> have separate ambitus for that reason?
Not until Nicolas's commit today.
In any case, it doesn't seem appropriate to use a scheme engraver
here, since there are no grobs cr
On 1 March 2010 09:26, Stefan Thomas wrote:
> Dear community,
> I try to get two textspanners at the same time.
> It works fine, but: I can't see the stringendo-Text!
> What could be the reason?
There's a space in bound-details here:
> stringendo = { \textSpannerUp \override ConTextSpan.TextSpan
On 2 March 2010 16:27, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> where are we with regard to this feature (see below)? It would be nice
> to have it somewhere, either as a snippet or... you name it ;)
It's all sorted. See the selected snippets for easy noteheads.
Cheers,
Neil
_
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Hendrik Fuß wrote:
> Because the multi-measure rest bars are too short, the three tempo marks are
> stacked on top of each other.
Greetings,
I've added this bug (with much delay) to our bug tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1024
Issue #
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> I have a score with a full-page title page and several scores. Now, everything
> fits on 3 pages, but the page breaks are not ideal and I can afford to use 4
> pages anyway.
Greetings Reinhold,
I'm checking up on old bug reports and I'd
Guys,
where are we with regard to this feature (see below)? It would be nice
to have it somewhere, either as a snippet or... you name it ;)
Cheers,
Valentin
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:57 PM, pound...@lineone.net
wrote:
> #(define ez-numbers-engraver (list
> (cons 'acknowledgers
> (list
>
Hi,
When I write \times 2/3 { c8 c16 c8. } the second beam of the sixteenth note
goes to the left which in my opinion is wrong.
Am I missing something or do I have to overwrite the default settings? (if yes,
how can I do that permanently for the whole score?)
Thanks for an answer,
ole
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you know python, or don't count time learning it towards the
estaimte, then 5 hours for basic usability. Maybe 15 for using
advanced xelatex stuff?
Note that I don't know what the difference is between xelatex and
pdflatex; I'm just going o
Graham Percival wrote:
> If you know python, or don't count time learning it towards the
> estaimte, then 5 hours for basic usability. Maybe 15 for using
> advanced xelatex stuff?
>
> Note that I don't know what the difference is between xelatex and
> pdflatex; I'm just going on the fact that the
On 3/2/10 1:59 AM, "keith Luke" wrote:
> Is it possible to suppress the open string indicator in fret diagrams?
>
> Instead of \fret-diagram #"4-2-2;3-1-1;2-o;1-o;" I would like the equivalent
> of \fret-diagram #"4-2-2;3-1-1;2- ;1- ;" where the o does not appear on
> strings 2 and three.
If yo
How very nifty. Hopefully I remember this if ever I need midi output
transposed.
On 02.03.2010, at 13:05, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
David has already provided an excellent answer, namely to insert a
\transposition c
at the top of the music, see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/
Documentation/user/l
Am 02.03.2010 09:42, schrieb Federico Bruni:
On Frescobaldi website:
"Currently, to install Frescobaldi you need a UNIX-like system such as
GNU/Linux (a very good choice anyway! :-). But as soon as KDE's Python
module (PyKDE4) becomes available on other platforms, Frescobaldi will
be able to run
At 13:12 on 02 Mar 2010, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, James Bailey wrote:
>
> > \score { \new Staff { \transpose c' c { \guitarMusic} } \midi {} }
> > should do the trick.
>
> Does this mean I have to use two \score sections. One for \midi and
> onBe {} for \layout {} like this?
Op dinsdag 02 maart 2010 schreef Federico:
> It seems that PyKDE4 has been already ported to win and mac:
> http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/software/pyqt/download
Yes, that't PyQt4. PyKDE4 is a different beast!
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http:/
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> >> It would also be a great opportunity to include an option for
> >> alternative TeX-compilers, e.g. xelatex, not just pdflatex.
> >
> > Patches appreciated.
>
> Do you have a rough estimate of the challe
Graham Percival wrote:
>> It would also be a great opportunity to include an option for
>> alternative TeX-compilers, e.g. xelatex, not just pdflatex.
>
> Patches appreciated.
Do you have a rough estimate of the challenges involved here?
___
lilypond-
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
David has already provided an excellent answer, namely to insert a
\transposition c
at the top of the music, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Displaying-pitches#Instrument-transpositions
Then, there's no need for a separate \score block for
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, James Bailey wrote:
\score { \new Staff { \transpose c' c { \guitarMusic} } \midi {} }
should do the trick.
Does this mean I have to use two \score sections. One for \midi and onBe
{} for \layout {} like this? :
\score { \new Staff { \transpose c' c { \guitarMusic} } \
David has already provided an excellent answer, namely to insert a
\transposition c
at the top of the music, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Displaying-pitches#Instrument-transpositions
Then, there's no need for a separate \score block for the MIDI output.
/Mats
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, David Kastrup wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
I have a guitar score and the MIDI output should sound one octave
lower than the written notes. I have found sections about transposing
instruments, but not about an instrument that plays in the written
key, but one octave
\score { \new Staff { \transpose c' c { \guitarMusic} } \midi {} }
should do the trick.
On 02.03.2010, at 12:28, David Kastrup wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
I'm sure my question is answered somewhere in the docs, but I can't
find it:
I have a guitar score and the MIDI output should sound
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
> I'm sure my question is answered somewhere in the docs, but I can't
> find it:
>
> I have a guitar score and the MIDI output should sound one octave
> lower than the written notes. I have found sections about transposing
> instruments, but not about an instrument that
Hi,
I'm sure my question is answered somewhere in the docs, but I can't find
it:
I have a guitar score and the MIDI output should sound one octave lower
than the written notes. I have found sections about transposing
instruments, but not about an instrument that plays in the written key,
b
Leaving the open strings out works for most fret diagrams, but when I
generate an F chord for ukulele, #"2-2;o;1-1;o;" becomes #"2-2;1-1;" and
the wrong fret diagram results.
Is there a way to put a "null" spacer for the open strings?
Thanks,
Keith
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Thomas Schar
At 09:48 on 02 Mar 2010, Stefan Thomas wrote:
> Dear community,
> does someone know, how to create the contuctor's sign for downbeat
> within lilypond?
There are lots of unicode arrow which might be what you are after, e.g.
\mark \markup "⬇"
Or draw something in postscript.
(Or surely \bar "|"?
Original-Nachricht
Is it possible to suppress the open string indicator in fret diagrams?
Instead of \fret-diagram #"4-2-2;3-1-1;2-o;1-o;" I would like the equivalent
of \fret-diagram #"4-2-2;3-1-1;2- ;1- ;" where the o does not appear on
strings 2 and three.
Thanks,
Keith
Is it possible to suppress the open string indicator in fret diagrams?
Instead of \fret-diagram #"4-2-2;3-1-1;2-o;1-o;" I would like the equivalent
of \fret-diagram #"4-2-2;3-1-1;2- ;1- ;" where the o does not appear on
strings 2 and three.
Thanks,
Keith Luke
Sorry for the long quoted text.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:59:07PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> James Bailey wrote:
>>
>> This is basically what confuses people. No, it's not any different
>> than what's explained elsewhere, it's just that it's not explained all
>> together. All of the co
Dear community,
does someone know, how to create the contuctor's sign for downbeat within
lilypond?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Frescobaldi website:
"Currently, to install Frescobaldi you need a UNIX-like system such as
GNU/Linux (a very good choice anyway! :-). But as soon as KDE's Python module
(PyKDE4) becomes available on other platforms, Frescobaldi will be able to run
on these platforms too."
It seems that PyKD
James Lowe wrote:
Which lists would these be?
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
/Mats
James
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:33:22AM -0600, M.E. wrote:
Some news I thought to share here. The Werner Icking Music Archive
has
If I remember correctly, frescobaldi doesn't run on osx. although
most of KDE4 has been ported, there are some packages that
frescobaldi needs that just don't exist for it.
On 02.03.2010, at 08:55, Mika Kuuskankare wrote:
Hi,
Is anybody using Frescobaldi on OS X by any chance?
-Mika
Dr.
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote:
>
>
> Well, if you manage to describe how that should work. If you imagine
> yourself in the role of the autochanger, how would you react if somebody
> else did some extra staff changes every now and then. When should you
> start doing your ordinary job after such a
40 matches
Mail list logo
