Hi,
I just did a compile with 2.12 and the layout is good.
Craig Bakalian
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 16:45 -0500, James Lowe wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Just to say that 2.13.8 is an unstable release and this is obviously a big
> project for you, rather than 'trying it out for fun' so to that end, have
I downloaded the 2.13.9 documentation and extracted the PDFs. I notice
that in web.pdf, most of the graphics are rendered too large and run off
the edge of the page...
Nick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
Hey everybody, I'm having a problem with noteheads in different voices
colliding, and I can't seem to fix it. I tried the standard fix from the
notation: \once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = # , which worked fine
in a test case I did, but for some reason has zero effect in the document.
He
Craig,
Just to say that 2.13.8 is an unstable release and this is obviously a big
project for you, rather than 'trying it out for fun' so to that end, have to
tried to compile the file using the stable 2.12.x release. At least that way we
know if it is something new in this work-in-progress rel
Hi,
I am running 2.13.8 and I am just finishing a large concerto with three
movements with a full score of 90 pages. I have four percussion parts.
I use the RhythmicStaff for my percussion parts without tonality. The
RhythmicStaff(s) layout fine in the full score, but the layout isn't
fine on th
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> """
>> The half note and eighth note at the start of the second measure are
>> incorrectly merged because \mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn cannot
>> successfully complete the merge when three or more notes line up in
>> the same column, and in thi
It works fine. Indeed I will be patching the MS Windows Learning Tutorial with
screenshots that came from Windows 7 soon.
Once I get my head around git ;)
James
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Jonathan Kulp
Sent: Sat 12/12/2
Valentin Villenave wrote Saturday, December 12, 2009 12:36 PM
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
Coping to the bug list for confirmation.
I'm not sure the \oneVoice keyword is needed. Actually I'm not
sure at
all *what* the example is aiming to demonstrate... Besides,
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 17:34:36 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > Sorry, Since the bad frustrating Midi tie problem persists, I have
> > to roll back to 2.13.7, and wait for a version with fixed tie
> > playback.
>
> I second this: This belongs to the non-existent bug category
> `annoying' :-)
>
> Sorry, Since the bad frustrating Midi tie problem persists, I have
> to roll back to 2.13.7, and wait for a version with fixed tie
> playback.
I second this: This belongs to the non-existent bug category
`annoying' :-)
Seriously: It should be fixed ASAP, or please revert to the old
behaviour.
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 15:43:37 schrieb 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng:
> Sorry, Since the bad frustrating Midi tie problem persists, I have to roll
> back to 2.13.7, and wait for a version with fixed tie playback.
I've tried to fix the bug, but I'm always running into memory corruption
issues, and I h
Just to sum up:
stop =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(set! (ly:music-property music 'tweaks)
(acons 'before-line-breaking
(lambda (grob)
(let ((dots (ly:grob-object grob 'dot)))
(ly:grob-set-property! grob '
As mentioned in the release message, users are strongly recommended to
use 2.12.2, not 2.13. We will let you know when we think that 2.13.x
is ready for users to test.
Cheers,
- Graham
2009/12/12 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng :
> Sorry, Since the bad frustrating Midi tie problem persists, I have to roll
> ba
Sorry, Since the bad frustrating Midi tie problem persists, I have to roll back
to 2.13.7, and wait for a version with fixed tie playback.
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
In the future, a better formed question would be, "Hi, I installed
lilypond on Windows 7 and am having these problems…"
On 12.12.2009, at 03:37, Roberto Altschul wrote:
Does Lilypond run under Windows 7?
Roberto Altschul
___
lilypond-user mail
On 12.12.2009, at 00:29, Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/12/11 stefankaegi :
uhm... I have some doubts you understand me properly... The pedalling
actually should be like in my example (pedal on "e" and "f"), but
it's a
bit bad positioned.
This is a nasty bug of the Dynamics context: the pedal b
It worked fine on the Win7 release candidate I had installed as a virtual
machine a while back. I would assume it works under the actual release as
well. Give it a try. :)
Jon
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Roberto Altschul <
roberto.altsc...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Does Lilypond run under Wind
Does Lilypond run under Windows 7?
Roberto Altschul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
I was playing around with canvas (html 5- most modern browsers are
compatible except IE) when I thought of quickly creating a frontend to make
note inputs for lilypond easier (in the style of a music notation software,
but not quite really).
Here's the link: http://jabtunes.com/notation/
Hi Stefan,
Hm... I tried this a bit... Isn't a good solution either as it seems,
since I often have pedal where there are no notes.
(Already tried this polyphony thing: << { } \\ { } \\ >> ; but this
doesn't actually work fine)
It probably does if you use
<< {} \new Voice {} >>
instead.
D
Hm... I tried this a bit... Isn't a good solution either as it seems,
since I often have pedal where there are no notes.
(Already tried this polyphony thing: << { } \\ { } \\ >> ; but this
doesn't actually work fine)
Do you have any idea how I could change the pedal behaviour at certain
points in
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Coping to the bug list for confirmation.
I'm not sure the \oneVoice keyword is needed. Actually I'm not sure at
all *what* the example is aiming to demonstrate... Besides, doesn't
the doc explicitely mentions that this example isn't correc
Philip Potter wrote Saturday, December 12, 2009 10:33 AM
I'm confused by the docs for collision resolution:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices#Multiple-voices
In the example, the c2 and c8 are not merged because they have
different note-heads. But in th
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 11:33:33 schrieb Philip Potter:
> I'm confused by the docs for collision resolution:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices#M
> ultiple-voices
>
> In the example, the c2 and c8 are not merged because they have
> different note-h
Le 8 déc. 2009 à 18:40, Alexander Kobel a écrit :
> It was written by someone (Nicolas?) who needed it
I've written it be never needed it nor used it. It was a very old
feature request.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lis
I'm confused by the docs for collision resolution:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices#Multiple-voices
In the example, the c2 and c8 are not merged because they have
different note-heads. But in the second bar, the e2 and e8 *are*
merged, despite having diffe
2009/12/12 David Kastrup :
> "Robin Bannister" writes:
>
>>> << c4*3 2. >>
>>
>> Mmm, that was where you started. Sorry for the noise.
>
> You can get a better-looking result at the cost of quadrupling the
> number of warnings.
>
> {
> \clef "G" \relative c' {
> \once \override
"Robin Bannister" writes:
>> << c4*3 2. >>
>
> Mmm, that was where you started. Sorry for the noise.
You can get a better-looking result at the cost of quadrupling the
number of warnings.
{
\clef "G" \relative c' {
\once \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 08:35:24 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Again: could you explain why you want to write 2. as a duration and then
> remove the dot manually?
>
> This does not really make sense at all.
>
> > Thanks for the other examples. I hadn't seen it notated like that
> > before (I'm
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 08:35:24 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jay Anderson writes:
>> > Also for the other responses, sorry if I didn't explain it very well.
>> > This is the only way I've seen triple (and quadruple) stops notated so
>> > I thought it would be sel
<< c4*3 2. >>
Mmm, that was where you started.
Sorry for the noise.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Jay Anderson wrote:
I've attached a picture of the particular chord I was working on
(for viola, alto clef, in 3/4). In this case
I want to keep it explicitly notated and all in the same voice.
I suppose that this is notionally 2.
Something which sounds like that but looks like your pic
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 08:35:24 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jay Anderson writes:
> > Also for the other responses, sorry if I didn't explain it very well.
> > This is the only way I've seen triple (and quadruple) stops notated so
> > I thought it would be self-explanatory.
>
> Again: could yo
33 matches
Mail list logo
