Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, September 05, 2009 1:22 AM
my Windows hard drive
tragically fried last week, and I won't be able to do any
LilyPond work until next Wednesday at the earliest, and
that's when my work starts up again, so I may be delayed
quite a bit.
That's a bummer - I was wonder
Hello,
I think Lilypond is being a weirdo.
The second beam looks messed up to me (winxp sp3), but when I remove
the _"x" markup, the \p, or the slur in the treble clef, it clears up.
Is this bug #430?
Also, what's the best way to make that slur in the bass clef look nice?
It seems to be c
Mark Polesky wrote:
> I've already done a ton of work on keyboard tone-clusters
> and percussion pictograms, but my Windows hard drive
> tragically fried last week, and I won't be able to do any
> LilyPond work until next Wednesday at the earliest, and
> that's when my work starts up again, so I ma
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> (i) Would people be interested in having this in the docs?
>
> (ii) Any requests or suggestions for topics that should be covered?
>
>(iii) What are the restrictions on including examples from actual
> contemporary scores? I'm not thinking huge ext
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:57:11PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 9/4/09 10:27 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> > Carl Sorensen wrote" Friday, September 04, 2009
> > 3:06 PM
> >> Also, as you plan sections, remember that anything using \set or
> >> \override
> >> belongs in a snippet, not in th
On 9/4/09 10:27 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>
> Carl Sorensen wrote" Friday, September 04, 2009
> 3:06 PM
>>
>> Also, as you plan sections, remember that anything using \set or
>> \override
>> belongs in a snippet, not in the main text body.
>
> This certainly is a rule for NR 1, but is
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 22:05 +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:52:13PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> > Actually, I stumbled upon something very odd: though I haven't the
> > exact numbers, with 2.12 my opera used to compile in ~40 minutes on
> > Win32, ~25 minutes on Li
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> How is that odd? More complicated algorithms take more time. I
> haven't followed the details of the spacing changes, but I'd
> certainly expect them to take longer.
I do too, but -- let me do the math -- a _360%_ increase, really? :-)
R
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> When I'm testing my doc revisions I check them by attempting to build
> the docs, at least as far as the .texi files (in fact, I've been having
> problems building the HTML/PDF docs which seem to be down to failing
> regression test
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:52:13PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Actually, I stumbled upon something very odd: though I haven't the
> exact numbers, with 2.12 my opera used to compile in ~40 minutes on
> Win32, ~25 minutes on Linux64 -- but now that I have upgraded to the
> latest git sources
Patrick Schmidt wrote:
is there a way to achieve repeated ties of selected notes of a chord ... ?
This is rather like Nick Payne's LaisserVibrer question in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/msg00313.html
because both are what Lilypond calls semi-ties.
Maybe you
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> W00t, I got only
> real 5m47.699s
> user 5m32.306s
> sys 0m11.697s
> on my linux system (C2D @ 2 GHz), but I'm still on 2.12.1, which gave me some
> error messages, though the PDF was created. Perhaps 2.13 is a little
> faster(?)
Patrick Schmidt schrieb:
hi folks,
is there a way to achieve repeated ties of selected notes of a chord in an alternative
ending (apart from using a "polyphonic approach" in a homophonic context)?
e.g.
\repeat volta 2 {
1
}
\alternative {
{ 1 }
{ 1 }
}
The \repeatTie command can onl
Dear community,
in the below quoted example I see a very small collision between the beam
and the natural sign.
Is there a way to alter the maximum beam-heigth generally?
Here the example:
\version "2.13.3"
{
#(set-accidental-style 'neo-modern)
\clef "treble_8" << {fis' 16 dis' d'' dis'
Frank wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 3. September 2009 schrieb Tim Reeves:
>
>> Mainly for my own curiosity, I compiled the Reubke Sonata score to
check
>> timing:
>> WinXP SP3 32-bit, LP 2.13.3, LPT 2.12.869, on Intel C2D E9600 (2.8GHz),
2
>> GB RAM
>>
>> 5 min 38 seconds.
>>
>> A bit slower than the Li
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:36:49 +0200
> From: Joseph Wakeling
> Subject: Re: Contemporary music documentation
> To: Graham Percival
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <4aa0dfb1.6090...@webdrake.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Th
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
> From: -Eluze
> Subject: Re: Space before staff lines in ossia
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <25290931.p...@talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
> jancsika wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Here
hi folks,
is there a way to achieve repeated ties of selected notes of a chord in an
alternative ending (apart from using a "polyphonic approach" in a homophonic
context)?
e.g.
\repeat volta 2 {
1
}
\alternative {
{ 1 }
{ 1 }
}
The \repeatTie command can only be used outside of chord
Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> In order to have a
>> meaningful manual, this may require the addition of some new LilyPond
>> commands, which is *not* a problem.
>
> And is to be recommended if it results in an
> easier user interface.
I do have some concrete ideas here, which I'll lay out in an email
Hi Christian,
your pdf looks fine. But there are some aspects you could have achieved easier:
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:25:46 -0400
> Von: Christian Henning
> An: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: Lilypond - chord progression
> Here is what I have now. I
Carl Sorensen wrote" Friday, September 04, 2009
3:06 PM
Also, as you plan sections, remember that anything using \set or
\override
belongs in a snippet, not in the main text body.
This certainly is a rule for NR 1, but is not
absolutely essential for NR 2. But in general
you're right - s
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello all,
When I'm testing my doc revisions I check them by attempting to build
the docs, at least as far as the .texi files (in fact, I've been having
problems building the HTML/PDF docs which seem to be down to failing
regression tests).
One thing I've noticed is that if there are errors in my
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Joseph
Wakeling wrote:
> On that note ... does the Pirate Party have any kind of official
> response to this article by Richard Stallman?
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/pirate-party.html
Yes we do (as a matter of fact I am the Pirate member he refers to in
the nex
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Also, as you plan sections, remember that anything using \set or \override
> belongs in a snippet, not in the main text body. In order to have a
> meaningful manual, this may require the addition of some new LilyPond
> commands, which is *not* a problem.
Do you mean in the
Here is what I have now. It's only the first few bar but I like the
output. Please comment if you see something:
\version "2.12.2"
#(ly:set-option 'delete-intermediate-files #t) % deletes the .ps file
automatically
\header {
title = "Creep"
composer = "Radiohead"
}
<<
\new Chord
On 9/4/09 3:36 AM, "Joseph Wakeling" wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> Those "actual contemporary scores" must be placed in the public
>> domain, licensed under Creative Commons, or licensed under the GNU
>> FDL. If you're thinking about an exerpt of Shostakovich or Glass,
>> then forget abo
Thanks for your replies.
\bar allows a break, but does not force it. Ideally, I would like a
bar number printed only after a break.
If memory serves, the all-visible override didn't work in mid-measure
for the upcoming full-measure bar line. (I do not have the time right
now to override
Valentin Villenave wrote:
> [off-topic] btw: French Pirate Party's first election is in two weeks
> here, and since I'm the campaign manager that (partly) explains my
> lack of time to work on LilyPond ;-)
On that note ... does the Pirate Party have any kind of official
response to this article by
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> Oh, and make sure you vote for your country's Pirate Party.
> Branches started recently in the UK and Canada, so I've got my
> next elections' votes lined up. ;)
[off-topic] btw: French Pirate Party's first election is in two weeks
here, an
Graham Percival wrote:
> Those "actual contemporary scores" must be placed in the public
> domain, licensed under Creative Commons, or licensed under the GNU
> FDL. If you're thinking about an exerpt of Shostakovich or Glass,
> then forget about it. Blame copyright law[1], not me.
Actually I was
It is in the Version135 branch. So if you get the 135 branch with SVN,
and can build it, you can have it.
svn://scribus.info/Scribus/branches/Version135
Federico Bruni wrote:
Franz Schmid has fixed this bug in the Scribus SVN trunk, so will be
included in the 1.3.6 release.
Bert
Bertalan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Yes, thank you very much, Mats and Marc, my LaTeX is beginner...
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Marc Hohl wrote:
Pierre Couderc schrieb:
What is the best way for a book with Lilypond extracts in it?
I have tried LaTeX with lilypond book, but I get mixs of lilyponds
'images" with other images.
jancsika wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Here's a picky little question: what's the best way to get the staff
> lines of the ossia measure to extend, say, half a staff space before the
> first note (*without* changing any of the current spacing between notes)?
> Ideally I'd like to be able to set th
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
36 matches
Mail list logo
