2008/7/3 Kieren MacMillan:
> One solution is to use \translate.
>
> Hope this helps!
Oh, yes. That did the trick. Thanks, Kieren.
-Risto
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
I guess this is because of the compilation error when building the binary. I
uninstalled 2.11.50, and delet the bin folder which still contains a .dll file.
Then the reinstalled 2.11.49 can work well. Perhaps the problem is in that .dll
file, because someone said he also can't run 2.11.49
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> This is surely not the whole story.
> The repeated music |: to :| is then not congruent with the lyrics.
> In a song with several verses the first verse is ok,
> but subsequent verses get split.
>
Chord Names are preferable to free text because it is transposable.
However, I do not want the clunk of a Piano chord with every chord name symbol.
This sound occurs even if chord-name is visible as notes or not.
This is not where the actual chord is a composite of notes on various staves.
Is
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:02:32PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Christopher Suckling googlemail.com> writes:
>
> This looks really interesting, but I'm enough of a newbie to MacOS that
> it's hard for me to follow it all.
>
> >
> > Sorry it's a brief write up - I'm a bit rushed now. If you wa
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> All the choral scores that I have seen put the pickup note before the |: and
> use whole measures for the voltas (like in the attached example).
>
> Patrick Horgan wrote:
> > What else are you going to do if there's a pickup note
> > and the 2nd ending goes on? You
Thanks Valentin. I changed it to \tempo and it worked fine. All is
good! Best,
Jonathan
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/7/3 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I just installed the latest build and when I ran the file I'm working on, it
came back with this error, which I think has to do wit
sdfgsdhdshd wrote:
>
>
>
> Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>>
>> Hi 'sdfgsdhdshd'... ;-)
>>
>>> In a score with 3 notes, is it possible that the first note has a
>>> dashed slur
>>> with the third, while the second note has a solid slur with the third?
>>
>> You could do something like the foll
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
> Hi 'sdfgsdhdshd'... ;-)
>
>> In a score with 3 notes, is it possible that the first note has a
>> dashed slur
>> with the third, while the second note has a solid slur with the third?
>
> You could do something like the following:
>
> %
> \v
sdfgsdhdshd orange.fr> writes:
>
>
> In a score with 3 notes, is it possible that the first note has a dashed slur
> with the third, while the second note has a solid slur with the third?
>
> Thank.
>
Kieren gave you a great answer on how to get the dashes you need.
Perhaps another answer
Oscar gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hi,This is great, but Is it possible to insert some melody measures with
> standard notation??
> Thanks,Oscar.
Of course.
% Begin Snippet
mychords = \chordmode {
c1:7
f
}
myrhythm = {
\key f \major
e8 f8 r8 b8 r8 b8 r8 b |
c1
}
%\new Staff
Hi 'sdfgsdhdshd'... ;-)
In a score with 3 notes, is it possible that the first note has a
dashed slur
with the third, while the second note has a solid slur with the third?
You could do something like the following:
%
\version "2.11.49"
\include "english.ly"
phrasingSl
In a score with 3 notes, is it possible that the first note has a dashed slur
with the third, while the second note has a solid slur with the third?
Thank.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Are-parallel-slurs-possible--tp18268193p18268193.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypon
Hi,
This is great, but Is it possible to insert some melody measures with
standard notation??
Thanks,
Oscar.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What version of LilyPond are you using? I'm using 2.11.50, and
Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What version of LilyPond are you using? I'm using 2.11.50, and I have
> no accidentals, just the key signatures.
I'm using 2.10.33. Thanks for all the pointers to solutions.
-- Johan
'Chord' is alive again -- http://chordii.sourceforge.net
__
[Lilypond 2.11.49]
Hello all,
I need boxed markups with a set padding, i.e. I'm currently using
^\markup { \override #'(box-padding . 1) \box { ... } }
How can I set this value once, rather than needing to do it each
time? I've tried
\override TextScript #'box-padding = #1
but
Hi Risto,
was wondering if it's possible to move around
a \markup block that's outside the \score block.
One solution is to use \translate.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
\paper { indent = #0 }
{
\new ChoirStaff
<<
\new Staff { c'2 c' }
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to move around a \markup block that's
outside the \score block. Inside the music section you can do wonders
with \override TextScript #'whatever but I couldn't come up with a
solution for this situation. I've attached an example below.
I'm asking this is becau
Am 03.07.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi James,
So is this a bug?
Looks like it...
or is there some way around this?
Did my solution (posted earlier) not work for you?
Kieren.
not with the cross-staff slur
___
lilypond-user mail
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 schrieb Johan Vromans:
> [Quoting Reinhold Kainhofer, on July 3 2008, 15:07, in "Re: Chord Charts -
> r"]
>
> > You mean the key signature (and its cancellation)?
>
> No, the accidentals (In your examples: the # in the 3rd measure).
Ah, I was using lilypond 2.11.x, and
Dear hhpmusic,
I've already started with some of the "funktionsbezeichnungen". I think, it
will be a lot of work to make a library with all the necessary sympols. But
maybee we can share the work.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http:
sdfgsdhdshd wrote:
>
> 6 warnings.
> Any conclusion?
>
no - I don't speak this language but I just thought an expert might find
something interesting in it...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-not-working%2C-XP-tp18253484p18260168.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilyp
Johan Vromans squirrel.nl> writes:
>
> Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>
> > Here is an example.
>
> Very nice!
> Is there a way to avoid the naturals and sharps? They're rather
> meaningless.
>
What version of LilyPond are you using? I'm using 2.11.50, and I have
no accidentals, just the
2008/7/3 Chris Gray :
>>Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 schrieb Johan Vromans:
>>> Is there a way to avoid the naturals and sharps? They're rather
>>> meaningless.
> Because b natural is used in the myrhythm in the first measure, a natural is
> used before that note head in the first measure. Carl w
Hi James,
So is this a bug?
Looks like it...
or is there some way around this?
Did my solution (posted earlier) not work for you?
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 28.06.2008 um 19:14 schrieb Andrew Hawryluk:
It looks like a bug to me. Here's a reduced snippet for the bug
tracker:
% Slur and fingering interfere with cross-staff beaming.
% If either the fingering or the slur are removed, the
% correct beaming is used.
\version "2.11.49"
\new PianoSta
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 schrieb Johan Vromans:
Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here is an example.
Very nice!
Is there a way to avoid the naturals and sharps? They're rather
meaningless.
You mean the key signature (and its cancell
[Quoting Reinhold Kainhofer, on July 3 2008, 15:07, in "Re: Chord Charts - r"]
> You mean the key signature (and its cancellation)?
No, the accidentals (In your examples: the # in the 3rd measure).
The leading key signature is significant. However, when transposing
the chords, the key signature
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 schrieb Johan Vromans:
> Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is an example.
>
> Very nice!
> Is there a way to avoid the naturals and sharps? They're rather
> meaningless.
You mean the key signature (and its cancellation)? That's easy: Simple create
the
Am 03.07.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi James,
it's processing the % as a word.
Are you on MacOS?
Regardless, it might be a carriage-return/line-feed issue (like the
one I fight with in the MacOS Lilypond editor) -- see what happens
if you surround the offending code/line w
Am 03.07.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi James,
it's processing the % as a word.
Are you on MacOS?
Regardless, it might be a carriage-return/line-feed issue (like the
one I fight with in the MacOS Lilypond editor) -- see what happens
if you surround the offending code/line w
Hi James,
it's processing the % as a word.
Are you on MacOS?
Regardless, it might be a carriage-return/line-feed issue (like the
one I fight with in the MacOS Lilypond editor) -- see what happens if
you surround the offending code/line with blank lines.
Good luck!
Kieren.
6 warnings.
Any conclusion?
Luc wrote:
>
>
> George_ wrote:
>>
>> The log file is generated, but nothing else. And the log file has only
>> one line:
>>
> I invoked lilypond with the verbose option which produced the attached
> output: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18256002/test.txt test.tx
I've just got an error on something that I've used before and after
(in the same file!) and I don't understand it
GNU LilyPond 2.11.49
»Scene_1.2.ly« wird verarbeitet
Analysieren...
Scene_1.2.ly:170:35: Fehler: keine gültige Dauer: 47
mei4. -- de!8 \skip4|
2008/7/3 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just installed the latest build and when I ran the file I'm working on, it
> came back with this error, which I think has to do with a macro included
> near the top of the document.
Yeah, I get the same error with the same macro. The good news is, y
Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is an example.
Very nice!
Is there a way to avoid the naturals and sharps? They're rather
meaningless.
-- Johan
'Chord' is alive again -- http://chordii.sourceforge.net
___
lilypond-user mailing li
2008/7/3 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The correct answer is "Please read LM 3+4 in the 2.11 docs".
... Or that too, yes :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon
George_ wrote:
>
> The log file is generated, but nothing else. And the log file has only
> one line:
>
I invoked lilypond with the verbose option which produced the attached
output: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18256002/test.txt test.txt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
Mark Knoop opus11.net> writes:
>
> Unfortunately not, although some people may know of workarounds.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391&q=include
>
Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
I surely would love to have \includeRelative
Until then I'll include several (sets of) incl
On my XP, 2.11.50-1 crashes on every ly file, even simple ones.
George_ wrote:
>
> I recently (i.e. about twenty minutes ago) downloaded the 2.11.50-1
> version of Lilypond, uninstalled 2.11.49, and installed the 2.11.50
> version. However, after I had done this, none of my .ly files worked in
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:56 +, Arno Rog wrote:
> The file partitur.ly in directory .\ contains
> \include "./PART1/score-part1.ly"
> This does not work, it is unable to find violin.ly
>
> Is there a way to achieve this without using hardcoded path's?
Unfortunately not, although some people m
Not that I'm aware of. There's a request for this in the issue
tracker; it even has a bounty attached.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:56:12 + (UTC)
Arno Rog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> L.S.
>
> I my everlasting journey to engrave a complete cantata I've stumbled
> upon the proble
L.S.
I my everlasting journey to engrave a complete cantata I've stumbled upon the
problem of nested includes. The problem has been mentioned before,
I was unable to find a solution.
I have the following directory-structure (Windows):
.\
.\PART1
.\PART1\MUSIC
.\PART1\MUSIC\violin.ly
The fil
I recently (i.e. about twenty minutes ago) downloaded the 2.11.50-1 version
of Lilypond, uninstalled 2.11.49, and installed the 2.11.50 version.
However, after I had done this, none of my .ly files worked in regards to
compilation; the traditional MS Windows Error Report window comes up saying
Lil
Am 03.07.2008 um 04:17 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Hi everyone,
I just installed the latest build and when I ran the file I'm
working on, it came back with this error, which I think has to do
with a macro included near the top of the document.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop$ tarantella
running
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:36:50 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/3 Nick Baskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Where does the "\override Score.PaperColumn #'keep-inside-line =
> > ##t" line go?
>
> Either:
The correct answer is "Please read LM 3+4 in the 2.11 docs".
Cheers,
-
46 matches
Mail list logo
