is there a file that shows all of the pretty color options that the
emacs mode shows? I may attempt a nanorc that does something similar,
and I'd just like to know what options there are. Rather, I'd like to
know what emacs does so I can emulate it somewhat.
___
2008/5/8 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Neil, there are a few unapproved snippet that don't work with the LSR;
> can you double-check them and add them to input/new whenever you think
> it's relevant (tag them as 'docs' as well, since Jay seems to need
> them in the NR).
I assume Jay's
2008/5/8 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmm... now it's not working; in fact, I can't get preview to work for
> any snippet at the moment.
Neil, there are a few unapproved snippet that don't work with the LSR;
can you double-check them and add them to input/new whenever you think
it's rele
2008/5/8 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What's wrong with it? It works fine here.
Hmm... now it's not working; in fact, I can't get preview to work for
any snippet at the moment.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.g
2008/5/8 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Greetings,
>
> I don't know who added this snippet (Jay, is that you?), but there's
> something obviously missing in the source code:
>
> \relative c'' { c-+ }
> dashPlus = "trill"
> \relative c'' { c-+ }
>
> I'll happily approve it... as soon as t
2008/5/8 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know who added this snippet (Jay, is that you?), but there's
> something obviously missing in the source code:
Oh gosh, it's one of these 2.11 features again...
OK, never mind, I'll just add it to input/new. Sorry for the noise!
Cheer
Greetings,
I don't know who added this snippet (Jay, is that you?), but there's
something obviously missing in the source code:
\relative c'' { c-+ }
dashPlus = "trill"
\relative c'' { c-+ }
I'll happily approve it... as soon as the code is fixed :)
Cheers,
Valentin
__
hi all
still no joy with this
for composition worksheets it would be great if i could, for example,
make all b-flats and c-sharps red, or have it so that only the notes
of the E-pentatonic scale have white-note-heads in a chromatically
embellished piece. i'd like to do this with condition
Thanks Mats. Exactly what I was after. One day I may even understand how
it works ;)
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
...
#(define (text-in-white-box grob)
(stencil-whiteout (ly:text-interface::print grob) 0.5))
This line should of course have been
(stencil-padded-whiteout (ly:t
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
...
#(define (text-in-white-box grob)
(stencil-whiteout (ly:text-interface::print grob) 0.5))
This line should of course have been
(stencil-padded-whiteout (ly:text-interface::print grob) 0.5))
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mail
I would propose the following solution, which automatically adds the
white box around every syllable.
It works by redefining the function that typesets each LyricText object.
To make it work in version 2.10,
I copied (and slightly modified) a couple of functions that are
predefined in version 2.
Try a ChoirStaff instead of a GrandStaff. I know I've never had your
problem with ChoirStaff, and unless you really, really need the bar
lines running between staves for some reason, things will work a lot
better.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
I see. Version 2.10 will do this too, if you uncomment the lines
\consists "Separating_line_group_engraver"
\override BarLine #'transparent = ##t
But it's not what I want: I'm specifically trying to get the masking-out
behaviour, without having to apply it syllable by syllable. (No
account
2008/5/8 James E. Bailey:
> in 2.11, the text is typeset between the bars. That is, the text fits
> between the bars, and there's no need to white out part of the bar line to
> accommodate the text.
That's right. However, the lyric hyphens sometimes do collide with bar
lines. Is there a way to pre
I'm sure you remember the previous discussion we had on the same topic,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-02/msg00624.html
Let's hope somebody else has some new bright idea.
/Mats
Palmer, Ralph wrote:
Greetings -
I'm working on Repeats for the GDP (yep, still). Currently,
Hi Ralph,
My "Essential Dictionary of Music Notation" uses the terms
beat repetitions
measure repetitions
section repetitions
However, it has no special term for the symbol -- it simply describes
it in words: "This sign (%) is used..."
For the record, it also says "Do not use [b
Greetings -
I'm working on Repeats for the GDP (yep, still). Currently, Short
Repeats includes percent repeats and tremolos (for strings, tremolos
include both fingered and bowed tremolos). "Percent repeats" is not a
term I have heard outside of LilyPond, and if I were looking for those
repeats, p
in 2.11, the text is typeset between the bars. That is, the text fits
between the bars, and there's no need to white out part of the bar
line to accommodate the text.
Am 08.05.2008 um 12:08 schrieb Kim Bastin:
Thanks for your reply. I went with 2.10.33 as the "stable" version,
but
if 2.11
Thanks for your reply. I went with 2.10.33 as the "stable" version, but
if 2.11 is usable, I might try it. Is it possible to have both
coexisting on the same system? (Windows XP)
I removed the \markup {...} construct from the first line of lyrics and
removed Bar_engraver from the Lyrics context.
2008/5/8 Jean-Alexis Montignies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
Hi Jean-Alexis,
if you happen to be a French-speaking LilyPonder, you might be
interested in knowing that there's also a special LilyPond mailing
list in French:
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user-fr
Cheers,
Valentin
_
2008/5/8 Jean-Alexis Montignies :
> On the three first notes of the theme are to be played legato, but with a
> sylable on each note. I tried a phrasing slur, but then it collides with an
> articulation (I'm using 2.11.33).
You could use \set ignoreMelismata = ##t. To switch it off, use \unset
i
Hi!
How would I use a different articulation for the score and the lyrics?
I'm writing a score for a jazz standard.
On the three first notes of the theme are to be played legato, but with a
sylable on each note. I tried a phrasing slur, but then it collides with an
articulation (I'm using 2.1
I was going to say that I didn't see a problem with doing the file
without the bar lines in the text and removing the bar engraver, and
then I realised that you're using 2.10.33. While I can't speak for
that version, in 2.11, it works fine without the workaround. I would
highly recommend 2.
23 matches
Mail list logo
