Re: Smaller PDF, shrinking away largeness

2007-12-14 Thread Jay Ricketts
Nope, didn't turn off point-n-click. I'll try it - if the numbers are still "interesting", I'll post back. daf On Dec 14, 2007 11:11 AM, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be interesting if you could investigate what has been "removed". > Do the new files still contain the sam

Re: Smaller PDF, shrinking away largeness

2007-12-14 Thread Mats Bengtsson
It would be interesting if you could investigate what has been "removed". Do the new files still contain the same fonts? Are they embedded the same way? I really hope you turned off point-and-click in LilyPond, otherwise the comparison is completely uninteresting. /Mats daf wrote: In the int

Re: Smaller PDF, shrinking away largeness

2007-12-14 Thread Eric Knapp
On Dec 13, 2007 12:18 PM, daf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the interim, PDFCreator is a free win utility and does a great job of > stripping the extra bytes away: simply install, select PDFCreator as your > printer and print. The resulting output can be 80% smaller, or more. > > http://sourc

Re: Emacs lilypond mode on XP

2007-12-14 Thread Deacon Geoffrey Horton
My instructions are here: http://www.geoffhorton.com/lilymacs.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Emacs lilypond mode on XP

2007-12-14 Thread Palmer, Ralph
Hi - I'm running LilyPond 2.11.23 under WinXP SP2. I've been using ConTEXT for editing, but I'm starting to get familiar with Emacs (22.1.1, i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) from using it to work on the GDP. I'm not a programmer, but not a complete tyro, either. Can anyone please explain to me how I can ge

Re: tremolo

2007-12-14 Thread Valentin Villenave
2007/12/13, Tiago Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maybe anyone has any idea why the beam is not directed down as it is a > second voice in a staff It is a known bug (very annoying, I agree :) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=523 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?