Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time

I'm all for the use of arbitrary precision arithmetic -- the slowdown in processing would not bother me at all. Trevor's idea of a compile-time choice -- defaulting to 32-bit internals -- would make everyone else happy. BTW, should one of us file a bug on this? Best, Adam On 11/29/07, Trevor B

Re: font errors but still output

Even this: \version "2.11.35" \include "english.ly" {c c c c} results in the following output: %lilypond %args "C:\Documents and Settings\timr\Desktop\lilypond\minimal.ly" Processing `C:/Documents and Settings/timr/Desktop/lilypond/minimal.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing gr

Re: font errors but still output

You're probably using accented or otherwise 8-bit ASCII characters in markup text somewhere--lyrics, performance directions, title, something like that. Geoff ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li

font errors but still output

I get errors now on any .ly file I process, but still get output. Anyone know why I get the errors and how to stop them? a bunch of these: (lilypond.exe:4160): Pango-CRITICAL **: pango_coverage_get: assertion `index >= 0' failed then a bunch of these: programming error: FT_Get_Glyph_Name () err

Re: lilypond slowness?

2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ps. what funky business is the uninstaller up to, given that it seems to be > a magnitude slower to uninstall the files than install them ? True! but only in Windows. In Linux it is almost instantaneous. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http:/

Re: Lilypond for serial music?

On 30.11.2007 (11:24), Trevor Bača wrote: > Hi Andrea and Miguel and Eyolf and everybody, > The initial efforts were > all implemented in C ... major or minor? :) > So (lack of) robustness drove me away from C What's more robust than a C major chord? Sorry for joking -- thanks for your story.

Re: lilypond slowness?

Ok, I did some further testing ... Test setup: install versions one at a time to C:\lilypond and issue c:\lilypond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe -V file.ly twice and see if it halts at Building font database both times 2.6.5 seemed to work properly didn't find anything 2.7 at ( http://download.linuxaudio.

Re: Change BarLines between transparent and black

Op vrijdag 30 november 2007, schreef hildegard kuen: > If I write a \new Staff \with { \override BarLine #'transparent = ##t} > how can I have a not transparent Barline for a single bar in the piece? by entering at the moment the barline should occur: \once \override Staff.BarLine #'transparent

Change BarLines between transparent and black

If I write a \new Staff \with { \override BarLine #'transparent = ##t} how can I have a not transparent Barline for a single bar in the piece? Bye Hildegard ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil

Re: Transposition

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Transpose#Transpose If you want more help, please provide your ly code. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transposition-tf4915983.html#a14088911 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lilypond for serial music?

Hi Andrea and Miguel and Eyolf and everybody, Sorry I've been absent from this thread for a bit; Andrea's guessing right that I've been busy ... :-) Warning: lots of words, and it's all personal stuff, too. Quite a few years ago I sat down and made the conscious decision that trying to write ou

Re: Putting chords below a alternative repeat bracket

On 30 Nov 2007, at 17:13, Mats Bengtsson wrote: If you use version 2.10, see the section on "Printing Chord names" in the manual, if you use the latest development version 2.11.x, then the chords are placed below the repeat brackets by default. The style of putting the chords above the rep

Re: Putting chords below a alternative repeat bracket

Uwe Steinmann wrote: Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes: If you use version 2.10, see the section on "Printing Chord names" in the manual, if you use the latest development version 2.11.x, then the chords are placed below the repeat brackets by default. I must be blind. All I see is

Re: Putting chords below a alternative repeat bracket

Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes: > > If you use version 2.10, see the section on "Printing Chord names" in the > manual, if you use the latest development version 2.11.x, then the chords > are placed below the repeat brackets by default. > I must be blind. All I see is an example on how to pri

Re: Putting chords below a alternative repeat bracket

If you use version 2.10, see the section on "Printing Chord names" in the manual, if you use the latest development version 2.11.x, then the chords are placed below the repeat brackets by default. /Mats Uwe Steinmann wrote: Hi all, I wonder if the bug described here http://osdir.com/ml/gnu.l

Putting chords below a alternative repeat bracket

Hi all, I wonder if the bug described here http://osdir.com/ml/gnu.lilypond.bugs/2004-06/msg00121.html is still true. Currently chords are put above an alternative repeat bracket which doesn't look as nice as below them. Is there any way to correct that? Uwe _

Re: Lilypond for serial music?

On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:18, Andrea Valle wrote: I don't like lisp-like languages. I really prefer OO languages. Haskell is an OO functional language with more working math like syntax (the LISP syntax comes from Church's thesis in mathematical logic). There is a Haskell

Lilypond error on starting for the first time

I just downloaded Lilypond version 2.10.33-1 (upgrading from 2.10.2), and when I try to typeset files I get an error: (OSError: [Errno 8] Exec format error) I'm running Mac OS 10.4.10; Lilypond is in the Applications folder. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Brenda GS (er, 'Munin')

Re: Lilypond for serial music?

Miguel Lopes Santos Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm considering either moving back to Common LISP with Lilypond output > or using the built-in Scheme interpreter; but although I have a 15+ year > programming background, I'm not finding it very easy to use Lilypond Scheme. I found googling