This bug is described in the manual in the section on grace notes,
together with an explanation on how to solve the problem.
/Mats
Quoting Ed Ravin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am trying to transcribe a piano piece that beings with a grace note in
the lower staff.
lower = \relative c, {
I am trying to transcribe a piano piece that beings with a grace note in
the lower staff.
lower = \relative c, {
\clef bass
\key c \major
\time 4/4
% e4 fs g a |
\acciaccatura bf,16 bf4 4 8|
}
If I uncomment the "e4 fs g a |" line, t
How about:
%%%snippet%%%
barr=
\markup {\postscript
#"0.2 setlinewidth -0.5 -3 moveto -1 -3 lineto 0 10 rlineto stroke"
}
{
f_\barr
}
%%%
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
is it possible to use absolute units in a scheme markup function?
The following example doesn't work:
#(define-markup-command (iname layout props name) (string?)
(interpret-markup layout props (markup #:combine #:hspace (* 50 mm)
#:large name))
)
Greets,
Michael
___
Hi all,
is there a way to enlarge only the accidental signs in a figured bass,
leaving the numbers' size unchanged?
Regards,
Michael
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Valentin,
Yes it does: you just have to give enough amount of hspace so the
instrument names can fit in. Look at the following snippet (maybe I'll
add it to the LSR, unless you have some improvements to propose).
Many thanks first. It really works.
Michael
Maybe you could enhance your ex
Thanks for all the music i now can make with lilypond!
I'm happy with it.
Kind regards,
Peter
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi everyone,
I can't help but to comment on this.
For one thing, how would such an analysis as Han-Wen proposes proceed --
statistically?
>From all of my observation of European hand engraving, clefs only take up
extra horizontal spacing when it is necessary for the sake of fitting the
clef. Ot
I am a newbie to lilypond and music too ;)
as far as I understand your question here is my explanation :
when you click on the lilypond shortcut, which is probably on your desktop,
the cmd.exe program runs and a black window appears... this is where
lilypond runs...
then a text file with .ly exte
2007/8/21, Michael Käppler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It seems that Thies' workaround which he posted in Oct 2006
> doesn't work anymore.
Yes it does: you just have to give enough amount of hspace so the
instrument names can fit in. Look at the following snippet (maybe I'll
add it to the LSR, unless
Thank you for the insight.
I'm thinking of submitting my oldschooljumps.ly definitions to the LSR. Maybe
someone would find it useful (maybe more useful than my earlier "tweak" ^_^).
Romel
- Original Message -
From: Neil Puttock
To: Romel Anthony Bismonte
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu
Hi Romel,
How do I make the volta stretch to the beginning of the measure?
>
You can stop the rehearsal mark influencing the volta's spacing by
overriding its X-extent property:
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'X-extent = #'(0 . 0)
Assuming your snippet shows where you want the coda mark p
Hi all,
I'll give it another try - I searched a lot on how to left align several
instrument names(different staves), but didn't find even a workaround on
the list. It seems that Thies' workaround which he posted in Oct 2006
doesn't work anymore.
Regards,
Michael
His post:
Here's what I do (
2007/8/21, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Off the top of my head, I would suggest writing a scheme function where
> something like
>
> \timeSig #'(3 . 4)
>
> will emit
>
> \time 3/4
> \mark "3/4"
>
> so that you are dealing with RehearsalMarks, which can then be aligned however
> you want.
Yes
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 18:12, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I'm trying to rewrite the LSR TimeSig snippet (and probably use it in
> my own score):
>
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=272
>
> The two modifications I want to add are: remove the
> Time_signature_engraver instead
2007/8/16, Gilles THIBAULT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> See Mats explications :-)
...and Mats' snippet, which I've just approved:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=310
Regards,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lis
2007/8/21, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A few days ago, I added an example to the LSR (see www.lilypond.org ->
> Documentation)
> that answers your question. However, it has still not been approved for
> publication,
I just approved it; here it is:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=
A few days ago, I added an example to the LSR (see www.lilypond.org ->
Documentation)
that answers your question. However, it has still not been approved for
publication,
but you can also find it in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-08/msg00221.html
/Mats
Graham Percival w
Hello again,
I'm trying to rewrite the LSR TimeSig snippet (and probably use it in
my own score):
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=272
The two modifications I want to add are: remove the
Time_signature_engraver instead of using #'transparent, AND get the
time signatures aligned with the barli
Hi all,
I have no knowledge as to how LilyPond does the spacing for this specific
situation, but I seem to have a war going on between the rehearsal mark
(marking the second line as a Coda) and the Volta bracket.
% --- original file --- %
\version "2.10.25"#(define-markup-command (jumptext la
20 matches
Mail list logo
