Hi!
Have bee'n working on some edits on renaisance music lately and did run
in to trouble. I do use the modell in documentation on transcription of
mensural music.
I'm getting i to trouble when incipit and piece are in different keys.
When "transposing" from "f major" (one flat) to "g ma
Please read in section "Explicitly instantiating voices" to learn
exactly what
the <<{...} \\ {...} >> feature does. Since the start and end of the
glissando
has to happen in the same voice, i.e. in the same Voice context, you
have to
use the \\ feature also in the next measure:
\version "2.10
Am 28/11/2006 um 22:42 schrieb Nick Bailey:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My understanding was that the f dots are the vestiges of the two
lines in the letter "F"... is that not the case? Hence the C clef
and G clef wouldn't have them (being stylised "C"s and "G"s
respect
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
However, what is the reason to use \tweak at all? Why not simply do
an ordinary \once \override:
\version "2.10.0"
fraction = \override TupletNumber #'text =
#tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
Sorry, this should of course be
fraction = \once \override TupletNumber #'te
No, this doesn't work.
What does work is
\version "2.10.0"
fraction = #(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
#{
\tweak #'text #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text $music
#})
\relative c'{
\fraction
\times 2/3 {
c'8 c'8 c'8
}
}
Howeve
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Does it work just to define this macro at the top level
fraction = \tweak #'text #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
[...]
Are you sure that you want to overwrite LilyPond's `\fraction'
function?
??? Are you thinking of the \fraction markup command? In
> Does it work just to define this macro at the top level
>
> fraction = \tweak #'text #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
>
> [...]
Are you sure that you want to overwrite LilyPond's `\fraction'
function?
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing
Hello there,
How does one get a glissando to extend to the next measure? I'm using version
2.10.0 and here's the code. I'm trying to gliss from the d16 in the top voice
of the 2nd measure to the f-sharp in the top voice of the 3rd. The other voices
in the 3rd measure have been suppressed.
Than
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Jacob Rus escreveu:
By the way, is there any continuing development on the Lilypond.app
pyobjc application?
No.
Hmm, so what does this mean? Is the plan to leave it as-is, and still
recommend it as the way to install lilypond on OS X, or is there some
other way th
Hello,
Does it work just to define this macro at the top level
fraction = \tweak #'text #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
and then later in the music to write
\fraction
\times 2/3 {
c'8 c'8 c'8
}
Does LilyPond swallow that?
-- Tom
---
Jacob Rus escreveu:
>
> By the way, is there any continuing development on the Lilypond.app
> pyobjc application?
No.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
__
Jacob Rus wrote:
I recently put together a Lilypond bundle for the [TextMate][tm]
text editor, which any Mac users on this list might like to try.
The easiest way to get it is to first install TextMate, and then
use the recently-created ["GetBundle"][gb] tool by Sebastian Gräßl.
[tm]: http://mac
Arjan Bos escreveu:
> Please find included the untested patch for more fingers.
>
> diff --git a/scm/output-lib.scm b/scm/output-lib.scm
> index 2978f3b..d92f30c 100644
> --- a/scm/output-lib.scm
> +++ b/scm/output-lib.scm
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ centered, X==1 is at the right, X == -1
>
> (if
Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi Jacob,
I used your Lilypond bundle for TextMate. While working an a few songs,
I made some refinements to the bundle. See the attached patch.
Thanks for your work.
Christian
Thanks. I've applied most of the stuff in that patch, though I just did
it manually. Once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My understanding was that the f dots are the vestiges of the two
lines in the letter "F"... is that not the case? Hence the C clef and
G clef wouldn't have them (being stylised "C"s and "G"s respectively).
I've no authoritative source for this t
So after 9 hours of swearing and hunting and waiting I was able to
start looking at the patch. This is not why I switched to Mac OS X!
I'll bet... look here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OCWnXNj42U&mode=related&search=
and here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gfexq4Y7Dl4&mode=related&se
Arjan Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mmph, Software hate alert! (Oh and please, do not answer this part as
> I won't react to it)
Too late.
> So after 9 hours of swearing and hunting and waiting I was able to
> start looking at the patch. This is not why I switched to Mac OS X!
Maybe you sho
Please find included the untested patch for more fingers.
diff --git a/scm/output-lib.scm b/scm/output-lib.scm
index 2978f3b..d92f30c 100644
--- a/scm/output-lib.scm
+++ b/scm/output-lib.scm
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ centered, X==1 is at the right, X == -1
(if (> digit 5)
(ly:input-messag
Hi,
Using lilypond 2.11.0, MacOS 10.4.8, PB G4:
I'm getting extremely huge phrasing slurs now and again when the
first note of the phrase is also a short normal slur within the
phrasing slur.
In this context I have also discovered that changing the #'height-
limit of the PhrasingSlur has
Hi,
I frequently write
\tweak #'text #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
before tuplets, like this:
\tweak #'text #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
\times 2/3 {
c'8 c'8 c'8
}
What's the best way to abbreviate to something like this?
\fraction
I have been considering how nice it would be if lilypond had appropriate grobs
for setting music in the style of the Synodal Chant Books of the Russian
Orthodox Church. Its looks like this:
http://www.holycrosskliros.org/public_html/dload/toporki.png
This adaption of western staff-notation was
It's a bug in JPedal that is fixed in the current development release of
LilyPondTool. I'll make a release soon.
Bert
ian_hulin írta:
I think this is one for Bert.
If I use the Lilypond Tool Viewer to look at/print pdf files produced by
Lilypond V2.10-1 the treble clef is wrapped around the mi
I'd call that a trouble clef. ;-)
/Mats
ian_hulin wrote:
I think this is one for Bert.
If I use the Lilypond Tool Viewer to look at/print pdf files produced by
Lilypond V2.10-1 the treble clef is wrapped around the middle line rather
than the g-line. If I use Adobe Acrobat it looks and prints
I think this is one for Bert.
If I use the Lilypond Tool Viewer to look at/print pdf files produced by
Lilypond V2.10-1 the treble clef is wrapped around the middle line rather
than the g-line. If I use Adobe Acrobat it looks and prints fine.
Is this a quirk on my computer or a more general 'fea
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 04:17, you wrote:
> Monk Panteleimon escreveu:
> > Can I make the slurs ignore the invisible barlines?
>Han-Wen escreveu:
> this will be fixed in 2.10.1
Thank you very much. Actually, I found that the slurs don't avoid dotted*
barlines, so I can set those as default and
Am 28/11/2006 um 10:40 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
Also, I notice that only the F-clef has its two points; but I say
that every clef should have them, like the Soprano and French
Soprano clefs do in the big Bachausgabe. How do I put this
necessary points to my clefs?
Are you saying that also
Mats Bengtsson escreveu:
> In most situations, the hash sign is optional but can be added without
> chaning anythin. Unfortunately, the manual is a bit inconsequent,
> for historical reasons. The hash sign indicates that the value should
> be interpreted as within the Scheme language, but as I said
Am 28. November 2006, 08:56 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Jean-marc LEGRAND:
>
> So Santa Claus will have to find a good book on that !
Regarding scheme I would recommend the following two books. You can
actually get them electronically in full text (no need to wait for
Santa Claus ;-):
http://www.scheme.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning.
Numbering:
I am reading through the user pdf and writing a didactical work made
of ca. 300 8-bar pieces in one stave. I want to put a serial number to
each one, at its beginning, left from the clef. How should I do this?
Of course, I would prefer not
"so unfortunately there is no
simple rule,
except that if it doesn't work without the hash sign you should always
try to
add one, and vice versa."
/Mats
This is AWESOME !!!
Mats : just let us know when you write a programming-related book, I'm
definitely looking forward to reading you :)
T
In most situations, the hash sign is optional but can be added without
chaning anythin. Unfortunately, the manual is a bit inconsequent,
for historical reasons. The hash sign indicates that the value should
be interpreted as within the Scheme language, but as I said, this is
normally done anyway.
Monk Panteleimon escreveu:
> Hello.
> I am setting unmetred chant, using \set Score.timing = ##f.
> Previously I have always inserted
> \bar"" \break
> wherever I wanted a linebreak without a barline.
> Now I have discovered that I can use barAlways and defaultBarType = "" to
> insert invisible
well, well, well.
Statistically, I'll try Python and Scheme : these are the two most pointed out
in your numerous
replies ! And I have noticed that it is a good way to acquire programming good
habits. So Santa
Claus will have to find a good book on that !
Thanks for all your replies : lily
33 matches
Mail list logo
