- Original Message -
From: "Jay Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 2:50 PM
Subject: How to typeset this?
| I'm trying to typeset the attached measure (from brahms horn trio
| piano part, let me know if it works) in lilypond. Here's the best I
| got so far:
|
I'm trying to typeset the attached measure (from brahms horn trio
piano part, let me know if it works) in lilypond. Here's the best I
got so far:
\times 2/3 {r8 <<{bes''4~} \\ {bes8 ~}>>} << bes4 \\ >>
The problem I have is that the eighth notes aren't beamed, I can't get
the triplet bracket to
Hello how can i make all my chord name be placed inside parenthesis like
(Am) (F) (G)
Please help me!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Saturday 08 July 2006 19:16, Ezequiel Sierra wrote:
> Any help with this?
>
> On Jul 7, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Ezequiel Sierra wrote:
> > Does anybody can help me with this issue?
> >
> > On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:22 PM, Ezequiel Sierra wrote:
> >> What is the problem here?
> >>
> >> http://www.ezequielsi
Any help with this?
On Jul 7, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Ezequiel Sierra wrote:
Does anybody can help me with this issue?
On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:22 PM, Ezequiel Sierra wrote:
What is the problem here?
http://www.ezequielsierra.com/1.txt
i did as told, still not working
Hi, George:
When I ran it, it came out transposed, but without the header.
Also I just noticed the Chord Symbols didn't get transposed.
My bad -- forgot to transpose the CS, and leave the \header outside
of the \score.
The attached should Do The Right Thing™.
Best regards,
Kieren.
\vers
Bruce:
The 3.0 processor could note the 2.4 version flag and treat the ly
file in
the 2.4 way, maintaining upward compatibility without a need for
convert-ly.
Is that not exactly how software becomes bloatware!? =)
Best regards,
Kieren.
___
li
The 3.0 processor could note the 2.4 version flag and treat the ly file in
the 2.4 way, maintaining upward compatibility without a need for convert-ly.
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sandberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 5:
Hello, all --
Is there any way to declare the staff-size on a per-score basis,
instead of globally using #(set-global-staff-size X)?
e.g., something like
\version "2.9.10"
\score
{
{ a4 b c d }
\layout
{
#(set-staff-size 18)
}
}
\score
{
Hi, Joe --
I would like to transpose this little lead sheet from g to d, but
don't understand where to place the syntax.
I usually wait until the last second to use \transpose: directly in
the Staff object itself. See attached modified version of your document.
[Also note some of the other
On Jul 8, 2006, at 3:07 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:Let's say that you typeset a score in v2.4, and that lily, due to a bug, But, since 2.4 is a stable release, wouldn't there be the expectation that bugs were worked out before the next stable release is made, or that these "stable bugs" would be expe
On 7/8/06, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 07 July 2006 16:46, Fairchild wrote:
> LilyPonders -
>
> The only reasonable solution is to maintain upward compatibility in the
> LilyPond processor. New features should be added without changing existing
> syntax. If it is deemed a
I would like to transpose this little lead sheet from g to d, but don't
understand where to place the syntax.
I have read the manual:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/Documentation/user/lilypond/Transpose.html#index-Transpose-168
Terminal Output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/LilypondProjects-2.8> lilypond
On Friday 07 July 2006 16:46, Fairchild wrote:
> LilyPonders -
>
> The only reasonable solution is to maintain upward compatibility in the
> LilyPond processor. New features should be added without changing existing
> syntax. If it is deemed absolutely necessary to change semantics or define
> co
14 matches
Mail list logo
