On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 01:00 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> Attached is your file, slightly modified:
>
> - Removed the \key setting from the "global" variable because
> it causes a warning when used in the tab staff context
Right. That makes sense when you think about it.
> - Moved the "global" variab
Jamie -
Maybe \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-count = #1
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jamie Bullock
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 2:07 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Single line stave
Dear lis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I would have never thought that this mailing list, of all places,
> would host yet another language war !
It was not my intention to start a language war. I should have made
clear that my point was:
1. I don't see the point of re-writing working code just to replace a
Hi.
> Here is a simple file that I thought would be a good start for me
> getting into using lilypond. The intent is to produce the sheet music
> for fingerpicking guitar in regular note notation and tablature with the
> lyrics. I am not seeing the first staff of 'Guitar 1' on the output.
> Also I
Here is a simple file that I thought would be a good start for me
getting into using lilypond. The intent is to produce the sheet music
for fingerpicking guitar in regular note notation and tablature with the
lyrics. I am not seeing the first staff of 'Guitar 1' on the output.
Also I am not sure ho
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 20:04:03 -0200
From: Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "Filtering" expressions?
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
See "8.2.8 Different editions from one source" in the manual for more
info...
Thanks everyone. \tag seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Scheme really preventing users from hacking LilyPond's internals?
I sure believe it does. Scheme is ok, but too remote to many people's
culture. My perception has always been that the first few hurdles
Scheme doesn't really help, but I doubt whether this is the r
Hello list,
the placement of the staccato dots is different in the attached pdfs
made with 2.4.6 (cygwin) and 2.7.19 (windows) and is incorrect in the
2.7.19 file. Is this a bug?
Thomas
--
\version "2.4.6"
% \version "2.7.19"
\header {
title = "Gavotte"
piece = "Allegro modera
Hello list,
the placement of the articulations is different in the attached pdfs
made with 2.4.6 (cygwin) and 2.7.19 (windows) and is incorrect in the
2.7.19 file. Is this a bug?
Thomas
--
\version "2.4.6"
% \version "2.7.19"
\header {
title = "Gavotte"
piece = "Allegro modera
I would have never thought that this mailing list, of all places,
would host yet another language war !
Quoting Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > that Python would have enabled far more people to hack with
> > the internals., as the procedural-OO paradigm is more popular than
> > functional
Dear list,
I apologise if this in the docs and/or the list archives - I couldn't
find the answer..
Is there a way to reduce the stave down to a single line for a number of
bars in a score. I tried using percussion-style like this:
\new DrumStaff <<
\set DrumStaff.drumStyletable = #(alist
Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> is there a way to remove certain types of events
>> from an existing music expression?
>
> Maybe the follwing can be of help:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/lilypond/Different-editions-from-one-source.html
Good advice, indeed.
As soo
Andrzej Kopec wrote:
I had been looking at sources before asking this question, but this hadn't
provided any
solution. Also Lookup::bezier_sandwich didn't help.
I get this (or similar) from lily:
...
Layout output to `scm-markup-stencil-01.ps'...
/usr/local/share/lilypond/2.6.4/ly/init.ly:36:
Darius Blasband <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the positive side, I guess - Nicolas might contradict me here -
Had you not written that, I would not have answered :-p
> that Python would have enabled far more people to hack with
> the internals., as the procedural-OO paradigm is more popular
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 09:19 +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> It's certainly not a FAQ, I cannot recall having seen this very problem
> before. However, you can get much more help from the mailing list if you
> - Tell what operating system you use
Gentoo Linux (2005.1)
> - Tell how you installed Lil
How to or is is possible (at all, easily at least) to insert (and use inside
lily) custom
glyphs to feta musical font? I know, that almost anything could be inserted as
PS, but
this way would be more confortable, because of scaling and portability
(operating with
bare stencils is much harder tha
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:24:42 +0100
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > ...
> > This becomes much easier in later versions of the 2.7 tree, when
> > many \set's are replaced by \override's and therefore are eligible
> > to be included in a global \layout block (th
Hi list,
I hope the problem was not discussed in earlier threads.
Here I have a minimal lytex-example test.lytex and the corresponding
lilypondfile which is actually the "score-text.ly" from the "Regression
tests" in the dokumentation.
...and processed with:
lilypond-book -f latex --psfonts
Hi,
If it helps, I had this exact same problem when I tried to compile
LilyPond from source. The way I fixed it was to compile and install
the latest stable versions of GPL Ghostscript (8.15) and mftrace
(1.1.17). Not exactly sure which of these two fixed the problem,
probably mftrace, but
Hi Erik,
Yes, I did finally discover that. I'm slowly getting used to how the
newer version works (2.7.20), and like the somewhat-streamlined syntax a
whole lot. I'm definitely not a geek, so whenever something has been
simplified, it's better for me.
Blessings,
Fr. Gordon Gilbert
On Thursday 08 December 2005 14.47, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One problem is that Lily will usually process the entire piece, which
> > makes entering large pieces time consuming.
>
> but it needn't to be. One can use variables to hold sections of music
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 11.25, Gordon Gilbert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What's the syntax in 2.7.20 for skip lyrics? Previously, I had
>
> %shorthand for Skip Lyric
> sl = { \skip 2 }
>
> in the global section, and
>
> \sl
>
> where the words demanded it. How should that be?
IIRC, y
Daniel Johnson wrote:
> ...
This becomes much easier in later versions of the 2.7 tree, when many
\set's are replaced by \override's and therefore are eligible to be
included in a global \layout block (this includes vertical-extent).
It's not more or less difficult to do global settings of c
It's certainly not a FAQ, I cannot recall having seen this very problem
before. However, you can get much more help from the mailing list if you
- Tell what operating system you use
- Tell how you installed LilyPond (from some precompiled package or by
compiling it yourself)
- Include the output
24 matches
Mail list logo
