Mehmet Okonsar wrote:
> This one gives only an empty ps file no pdf.. I can't understand?
> -
> \version "2.7.10" { \relative c'
> c1^\markup {\char #65 }
> }
> -
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> why do you want to specify the character code? Why not
> insert whatever symbol you w
Sven Axelsson wrote:
... I failed to mention that this works if I make the changes
directly in script.scm, but obviously I want to avoid that.
The SCM lists enter Lily through ly/engraver-init.ly. Check there.
OK, great.
So, I do something like
#(define my-script-alist (append ... default-
Matthew M. Munz wrote:
Erik & Han-Wen,
I'm not sure that either example does precisely what I need. The
algorithm I want should convert c3 into c2. and c7 into c1 tied to c2.
in the next bar. The source format describes notes in terms of
absolute durations, and not in terms of traditio
Mehmet Okonsar wrote:
This one gives only an empty ps file no pdf.. I can't understand?
-
\version "2.7.10" { \relative c'
c1^\markup {\char #65 }
}
\char is deprecated. I'll remove it from 2.7
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_
On 16-Sep-05, at 11:59 PM, Mehmet Okonsar wrote:
I got a bit lost in the reference manual, what I want is just
tightening the
spacing a bit for a few notes, inside a feathered beam..
Try this:
c4 c4*3/4 c4*2/4 c4*1/4 c4*1/8 (etc)
- Graham
__
On 17-Sep-05, at 7:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
from what i understood, the issue of slur collision
was dealt with recently.
version 2.7.8, however, still produces both slur and tie
collisions with the cresc. marking:
I believe that this was fixed after 2.7.8.
As for general solutions t
Why not look how the default staccatissimo script is defined in
scm/script.scm? Another method to find out what you did wrong is
to look in the list of available font symbols in the feta font,
which is included in Appendix C.4, The Feta font, in the manual.
/Mats
Sven Axelsson wrote:
For som
Probably, you didn't include the \key statement within the
\transpose g c {...}.
/Mats
Aaron Mehl wrote:
Hi all,
I have a song that is notated in g major, where the
tessitura is to high to comfortably sing.
I need the notation to remain in g but want the output
to be in C major.
I tried \
Hi all,
I have a song that is notated in g major, where the
tessitura is to high to comfortably sing.
I need the notation to remain in g but want the output
to be in C major.
I tried \transpose g c {} and got the notes to
transpose ok but the key signiture is still in g
major.
I want to avoid
Sorry... I should have search the ML first.
It's the exact same problem as:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-04/msg9.html
I'd like to second that feature request (including showing R4 as r4,
when not hidden).
Peter
___
lilypon
> "MB" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB> Since the score lines are typeset as .eps files in lilypond-book
MB> LaTeX documents from version 2.6, I'm afraid the footnote support
MB> in LaTeX isn't really of much help.
I don't see how that would affect the way I do th
Unfortunately, I don't know any good solution, at least
not if you want some automatic handling of numbering
the footnotes and getting them on the correct page.
/Mats
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Sys
Since the score lines are typeset as .eps files in lilypond-book
LaTeX documents from version 2.6, I'm afraid the footnote support
in LaTeX isn't really of much help.
/Mats
Citerar D Josiah Boothby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The easiest solution would probably be to use lilypond-book. If my
> mem
Hi,
I'm trying to perfect a score, and I like that I can hide empty staffs
with \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
This works fine when I use multimeasure rests like:
R1*16
But since the piece I have starts with
\partial 4*3
It therefore ends with a partial measure with on a
r4
This "r4"
why do you want to specify the character code? Why not
insert whatever symbol you want directly with your text
editor?
/Mats
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
For some reason I can't define my own articulations using the staccatissimo
symbol. Any other symbol works.
\version "2.7.10"
#(define my-script-alist
(append
'(("accent-french" .
((script-stencil . (feta . ("staccatissimo" . "staccatissimo")))
(direction .
The easiest solution would probably be to use lilypond-book. If my
memory serves correctly that you're using 2.7, see chapter 12 in the
manual for more details. There's also a template in section 3.8. I
haven't used lilypond-book since 2.4, so things may have changed, and
it's possible that the
This one gives only an empty ps file no pdf.. I can't understand?
-
\version "2.7.10" { \relative c'
c1^\markup {\char #65 }
}
-
Best Regards,
Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
I can imagine several solutions but which one seems the most practical for
having footnotes in a score?
Best Regards,
Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
19 matches
Mail list logo
