Re: Can't use numbers

2005-01-30 Thread Paul Scott
J L wrote: Is it true that LilyPond doesn't like music variables with a number in the name? If I did: voice1 = { somemusic } and used that later, LilyPond would complain? Yes. Some of us use roman numerals to get around this. Paul Scott ___ lilypond

Re: Can't use numbers

2005-01-30 Thread J L
Then would it be worthwhile to make a note of that in the manual? From: Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: J L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Can't use numbers Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:20:03 -0700 J L wrote: Is it true that LilyPond doesn't like music variables with a n

Re: Macros to enter repeated patterns

2005-01-30 Thread Paul Scott
joe ferguson wrote: I'm trying to come up with a way to enter repeated patterns of notes and chords into a score by defining a pattern in one place and then invoking it in multiple places by naminf the pattern. After struggling with the problem for a while (it seems like a reasonable thing to

Can't use numbers

2005-01-30 Thread J L
Is it true that LilyPond doesn't like music variables with a number in the name? If I did: voice1 = { somemusic } and used that later, LilyPond would complain? Aligorith _ Listen to music online with the Xtra Broadband Channel ht

squeezed measure

2005-01-30 Thread Dr. Charles Gran
When I run a version of the example found at http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/An-example-of-a-musicological-document.html#An-example-of-a-musicological-document I get a squezzed example for the first staff of music. I'm using cygwin under Windows XP (2.4.2) and

Macros to enter repeated patterns

2005-01-30 Thread joe ferguson
I'm trying to come up with a way to enter repeated patterns of notes and chords into a score by defining a pattern in one place and then invoking it in multiple places by naminf the pattern. After struggling with the problem for a while (it seems like a reasonable thing to want to do, particul

Re: Install Problems on Mac

2005-01-30 Thread Chuck Boody
Thanks but... Exactly the same problem happens. I've never installed the complete developer tools on the Mac. Could this be the problem?? Chuck Boody On Jan 30, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Christ van Willegen wrote: Hi Chuck, Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3 updater. Ran

Re: Install Problems on Mac

2005-01-30 Thread Christ van Willegen
Hi Chuck, > Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3 > updater. Ran selfupdate-cvs. No porblems to here. Ran "fink install > lilypond-unstable" Responded defaults to the questions. I get this > error: What happens if you do this: fink selfupdate fink install lilypon

Re: Introducing the LIlypond Snippet Repository

2005-01-30 Thread Paul Scott
Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I can't get past any second page. Does it require an account just to view the snippets? Works fine here. It works now. Thanks, Paul ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.

Re: Introducing the LIlypond Snippet Repository

2005-01-30 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Wow! I find it more useful than the Tips&Tricks/Regression tests document. I'll be happy to contribute some snippets. Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Introducing the LIlypond Snippet Repository

2005-01-30 Thread Sebastiano Vigna
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: > BTW, the LilyPond version number used for the snippet should also be > given, as soon as in the search results (or even as a search option). > That's somehow one of the goals (again, I plan to add lots of stuff, but only if people like t

Re: Introducing the LIlypond Snippet Repository

2005-01-30 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't get past any second page. Does it require an account just to > view the snippets? Works fine here. BTW, the LilyPond version number used for the snippet should also be given, as soon as in the search results (or even as a search option). That wo

Re: \oneVoice and \voiceXX commands having the wrong scope

2005-01-30 Thread Graham Percival
On 28-Jan-05, at 8:28 AM, Yuval Harel wrote: This example is a very useful. Until now I didn't understand why the two different syntaxes << {} {} >> and << {} \\ {} >> were necessary. I think it should appear in the documentation (with the addition of \voiceOne and \voiceTwo to avoid collisions a