A Voice context in LilyPond can only contain notes, not lyrics.
I know that this seems unintuitive to some people, but that's the
way it is designed. Also, if you several pieces of music or whatever
within a pair of curly braces {...} in a LilyPond file, it means
"typeset these pieces of music in a
Dear list,
When creating a score for the choir I'm in, I found out that Lilypond
generates an extra measure at the end when the lyrics are defined
within the voice. When they are just outside the closing `}' of the
voice, the resulting pdf looks the same, except the empty bar at the
end has gon
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:16:16 +0100, Mats Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for the confusion! Taking another look at Yuval's second example,
the simple explanation is of course that he doesn't use the \\ feature
at all. In fact,
<< {\voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"} >>
does not create any ne
Thanks, added to bug cvs (midi-lyrics)
On Friday 28 January 2005 12.29, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Seems like a bug!
>
>/Mats
>
> Michiel Lange wrote:
> > Recently I have upgraded from lilypond 2.2 to 2.4
> > After convert-ly and running the files through lilypond it appears that
> > songs with l
Seems like a bug!
/Mats
Michiel Lange wrote:
Recently I have upgraded from lilypond 2.2 to 2.4
After convert-ly and running the files through lilypond it appears that
songs with lyrics that did have lyrics in midifiles in lily 2.2 no
longer have them. Has something changed around this point tha
Hi Riky and Maxime,
I had the following installation problem with Lilypond 2.4.2:
- Installation stopped at 98% at
"/etc/postinstall/postinstall-lilypond.sh"
- processing test.ly after cancelling the installation resulted in
the error message "can't find 'feta20.afm'" and no pdf output.
The foll
Recently I have upgraded from lilypond 2.2 to 2.4
After convert-ly and running the files through lilypond it appears that
songs with lyrics that did have lyrics in midifiles in lily 2.2 no
longer have them. Has something changed around this point that passed my
attention when reading the changed
Sorry for the confusion! Taking another look at Yuval's second example,
the simple explanation is of course that he doesn't use the \\ feature
at all. In fact,
<< {\voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"} >>
does not create any new context at all, it's actually equivalent to
\voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"
Yuval
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hackers: Is my guess below correct? In that case, wouldn't it be better
> to change the routine that invents new context identifiers so it never
> gives the names "1", ..., "4"?
"1" to "4" are only assigned by << \\ >> . Default names are either
empty or "\new" (for \n
Hackers: Is my guess below correct? In that case, wouldn't it be better
to change the routine that invents new context identifiers so it never
gives the names "1", ..., "4"?
Yuval Harel wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:19:54 +0100, Mats Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you have not full
10 matches
Mail list logo