Can anyone comment on ptabtools? Do they work? I'm having a heck of a
time building them and I'd hate to waste too much time getting them
built if it's not worth it.
http://jelmer.vernstok.nl/oss/ptabtools/
--
Tony Willoughby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"My career is about a promising as a Civil War le
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Graham Percival wrote:
n 27-Nov-04, at 3:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
s there a mode in which single whole measures of rest have the
number 1 over them? If not this is quite common in parts and it
would be great if some switch would make it automa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> >
> > On 27-Nov-04, at 3:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a mode in which single whole measures of rest have the
> >> number 1 over them? If not this is quite common in parts and it
> >> would be great if some switch would make it
Graham Percival wrote:
On 27-Nov-04, at 3:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Is there a mode in which single whole measures of rest have the
number 1 over them? If not this is quite common in parts and it
would be great if some switch would make it automatic.
Have you tried setting
\override MultiMe
On 27-Nov-04, at 3:33 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Is there a mode in which single whole measures of rest have the number
1 over them? If not this is quite common in parts and it would be
great if some switch would make it automatic.
Have you tried setting
\override MultiMeasureRest #'expand-limit
Is there a mode in which single whole measures of rest have the number 1
over them? If not this is quite common in parts and it would be great
if some switch would make it automatic.
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Yes, and a list is not the same thing as a function. The fact that a
>> markup expression is a list is actually an implementation detail that
>> you should not bother about.
>
> (would it be a good idea to box markup expre
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > #(def-markup-command (restOne layout props)
>> > (interpret-markup layout props
>> >(markup #:number #1)))
>>
>> As soon as you are inside a Scheme expression, you don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >\score{ \rOne }
> >
> >
> Thank you very much. Now can you give me a hint as to a good way to
> combine those two definitions so a the second definition of rOne isn't
> necessary? This is because I want to make rOne eventually generate the
> correct one measure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Yes, and a list is not the same thing as a function. The fact that a
> markup expression is a list is actually an implementation detail that
> you should not bother about.
(would it be a good idea to box markup expressions inside a smob ?)
> > Parsing...
> > Backtrace:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > #(def-markup-command (restOne layout props)
> > (interpret-markup layout props
> >(markup #:number #1)))
>
> As soon as you are inside a Scheme expression, you don't have to use
> `#' before expressions; the \number ma
Citerar Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aaron Dalton wrote:
> >
> > This is what I now have in my score. It is still not displaying =/ I
> > am running version 2.2.5 on my Cygwin box, and 2.2.2 on my BSD box.
I can remember that there is a bug which only exists in 2.2.5 (but neither in
<=2.2
On 22-Nov-04, at 12:35 AM, Jose-Luc Hopital wrote:
2) I have now a set of directory on the same level : one for each
sonata with ~ 30 files in each ( op1_1/*.ly ,op1_2/*.ly ...). What is
the
easiest way to obtain score and parts of the entire opus: i.e.
the score or parts of the 6 sonatas in one d
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
hm, sorry.
(define-module (lily))
(use-modules (ice-9 format)
(ice-9 optargs)
(srfi srfi-1))
...
Works great!
Thanks,
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
>
>>Create that music-display.scm file, in the same directory as
>>displayscheme.ly, with the code from
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-11/msg00029.html
>>
> In my best attempt to extract the code from that ema
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Create that music-display.scm file, in the same directory as
displayscheme.ly, with the code from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-11/msg00029.html
In my best attempt to extract the code from that email I get:
GNU LilyPond 2.4.2
Processing `displaysche
Aaron Dalton wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
You left out { " " } (a space). Try:
upper = \notes \relative f'' {
\tempo 4 = 144 f1^\markup { " " }
}
I only tested this on 2.4.2 (without the \notes).
This is what I now have in my score. It is still not displaying =/ I
am running version 2.2.5 on my
Paul Scott wrote:
You left out { " " } (a space). Try:
upper = \notes \relative f'' {
\tempo 4 = 144 f1^\markup { " " }
}
I only tested this on 2.4.2 (without the \notes).
This is what I now have in my score. It is still not displaying =/ I
am running version 2.2.5 on my Cygwin box, and 2.2
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
<>Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That I don't yet. Another look at new-markup-scm tells me a markup is
a list?
Yes, and a list is not the same thing as a function.
Understood.
The fact that a
markup expression is a list is actually an implementation detail that
Aaron Dalton wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Aaron Dalton wrote:
upper = \notes \relative f'' {
* f1
}
lower = \notes \relative f' {
* f1
}
It's a bug. It will work in most of the places you tried if you also
add:
^\markup{ " " }
at the same place.
HTH,
Paul Scott
Thank you for the help
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>(lambda ...) evaluates to a function,
>>
> That I understand.
>
>> where you want a markup.
>>
> That I don't yet. Another look at new-markup-scm tells me a markup is
> a list?
Yes, and a list is not the same thing as a function. The fact that a
markup ex
Paul Scott wrote:
Aaron Dalton wrote:
upper = \notes \relative f'' {
* f1
}
lower = \notes \relative f' {
* f1
}
It's a bug. It will work in most of the places you tried if you also add:
^\markup{ " " }
at the same place.
HTH,
Paul Scott
Thank you for the help, Paul, but I'm still
The various Emacsen may or may not work out of the box with the
Lilypond mode; the extension .ly is usually not registered for it by
default (or it wasn't with every copy of (X)Emacs I have installed,
Windows or Linux).
To get the desired behavior you have to 1) append the directory with
the
Have you tried jEdit with the LilyPondTool plugin? If not, and you're
using Windows, it is a must :-)
http://www.jedit.org/index.php?page=download
Syntax highlighting is included in jEdit and the plugin is installed
from the Plugins menu of jEdit.
For plugin features see http://lily4jedit.source
Paul Scott wrote:
I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/test$ lilypond-snapshot displayscheme.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.4.2
Processing `displayscheme.ly'
Parsing...
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
?: 0* [primitive-load "music-display.scm"]
: In procedure open-file in expression (primitive-load
name):
: No such f
Rob V wrote:
I just installed Xemacs on my Cygwin system to try that out. Up till now I've been using Wordpad. Xemacs seems to run ok, but how do I start it in lilypond-mode?
I have not tried Cygwin but simply opening a .ly file with (X)emacs
should do it.
Paul Scott
___
Aaron Dalton wrote:
Try as I might, I cannot get a tempo marking to appear at the
beginning of my piece. I use versions 2.2.2 and 2.2.5. I am
referring to section 3.7.4 of the documentation. No matter where I
put the "\tempo 4 = 144" line, I cannot get it to appear on the
score. Below is an
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does this make any sense?
#(def-markup-command (testOne layout props) ()
(interpret-markup layout props
(markup #:number
(lambda (x) (ly:music-property x 'numerator)
No.
(lambda ...) evaluates to a function,
That I under
I just installed Xemacs on my Cygwin system to try that out. Up till now I've
been using Wordpad. Xemacs seems to run ok, but how do I start it in
lilypond-mode?
Rob
--
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreeju
Try as I might, I cannot get a tempo marking to appear at the beginning
of my piece. I use versions 2.2.2 and 2.2.5. I am referring to section
3.7.4 of the documentation. No matter where I put the "\tempo 4 = 144"
line, I cannot get it to appear on the score. Below is an excerpt of my
score
I will be out of the office starting 11/22/2004 and will not return until
12/01/2004.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does this make any sense?
>
> #(def-markup-command (testOne layout props) ()
> (interpret-markup layout props
>(markup #:number
> (lambda (x) (ly:music-property x 'numerator)
No.
(lambda ...) evaluates to a function, where you want a
markup.
Hi,
I'm trying to set a piano part with kneed beams for a voice that
frequently crosses staves. The docs say that this should happen
automatically, but I can't seem to get it to work. I've tried to
decrease the auto-knee-gap property, but to no avail: my beams and stems
all end up in the upper
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ok, that looks pretty simple but I'm not quite sure yet how to combine
my two definitions so I won't have to type '\markup' each time. (see
below).
Even so I would like to understand the scheme code. I have been
searching through the
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, that looks pretty simple but I'm not quite sure yet how to combine
> my two definitions so I won't have to type '\markup' each time. (see
> below).
>
> Even so I would like to understand the scheme code. I have been
> searching through the scm directo
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
#(def-markup-command (restOne layout props) ()
(interpret-markup layout props (markup #:number "1")))
rOne = { R1^\markup \restOne }
\score{ \rOne }
Thank you very much. Now can you give me a hint as to a good way to
combine
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>#(def-markup-command (restOne layout props) ()
>> (interpret-markup layout props (markup #:number "1")))
>>
>>rOne = { R1^\markup \restOne }
>>
>>\score{ \rOne }
>>
>>
> Thank you very much. Now can you give me a hint as to a good way to
> combine those
37 matches
Mail list logo
