Please check out my webcam,

2004-08-27 Thread Chloe Lawrence
You must enable HTML to view this message. 9940.pNP ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: compatible with Windows 98 ?

2004-08-27 Thread Michael Lakes
I tried it a few times ... it seems the problem is from python. Even running the python's help in cygwin by itself will cause a crash. I also tried to revert back to older version of python, but can't seem download them anymore ... From: Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: de la part de To

Re: Adjusting slur lines?

2004-08-27 Thread Michael Lakes
Using \slurUp doesn't have the result I intened ... maybe I should have said that I want the slur closer to the note head. But the the attachment-offset does work. Thanks a lot! From: Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Michael Lakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Adju

Re: compatible with Windows 98 ?

2004-08-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Yes, if you search the mailing list archives, you will find > that there are some problems on Windows 98. Unfortunately, these > problems are out of control of the LilyPond developers since > they stem from other programs in the Cygwin distribution that > are used in the

Re: compatible with Windows 98 ?

2004-08-27 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Yes, if you search the mailing list archives, you will find that there are some problems on Windows 98. Unfortunately, these problems are out of control of the LilyPond developers since they stem from other programs in the Cygwin distribution that are used in the implementation of LilyPond. /Mat

compatible with Windows 98 ?

2004-08-27 Thread de la part de Tony de Vuyst
Hello, I downloaded the program, but it seems not to work on Windows 98. Right ? THanks for your answer TOny ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Lillypond/Cygwin installation troubles

2004-08-27 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Mathias Biilmann Christensen wrote: Hey again, and sorry for the slow reply. Went on vacation just before I got the mail. I checked setup.exe and the tetex-bin package was installed. This is what running the two commands you gave me: $ cygcheck kpsewhich Found: c:\cygwin\bin\kpsewhich.exe Found

Re: Midi2ly Was: Re: Finale for Linux?

2004-08-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Why don't you try to enhance midi2ly? It's written in python which is > > easier and faster to learn and work with than C. > > Python is overrated. C is easy, once you get the knack of it. You're probably right, but for mere mortals like me, Python is much better, be

Re: Midi2ly Was: Re: Finale for Linux?

2004-08-27 Thread donald_j_axel
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:38:15 -0300 Pedro wrote: > Why don't you try to enhance midi2ly? It's written in python which is > easier and faster to learn and work with than C. Python is overrated. C is easy, once you get the knack of it. -- donald_j_axel donax snabela get2net.dk -- http://d-axel.dk/

Re: Midi2ly Was: Re: Finale for Linux?

2004-08-27 Thread Stefaan
Python is overrated. C is easy, once you get the knack of it. As a user of both languages, I can wholeheartedly recommend python over C for the task of a midi to lilypond converter. C is not impossibly difficult, I agree, but Python is more expressive (i.e. in a practical sense, not in a theoretic