Re: dvips Problem, Round III

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Grubb
Fink 0.5.3 is the last version that will work with Mac OS-X prior to version 10.2 OS-X 10.2 or greater is required for Fink 1.x. Packages in stable have been tested enough to be declared stable. Packages that are in unstable does not mean that bugs have been found; it just means they have not

Returned mail: see transcript for details

2003-09-06 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
The original message was received at Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:02:39 +0700 (NOVST) from localhost [127.0.0.1] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reason: 550 Unknown local part kotelnikov in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) - Transcript of session follow

Virus in your letter

2003-09-06 Thread postmaster
Ваше письмо не было доставлено по назначению. В нем был обнаружен вирус или троян: document_9446.pif infected: I-Worm.Sobig.f Проверьте свой компьютер ! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dvips Problem, Round III

2003-09-06 Thread Will Oram
On Saturday, September 6, 2003, at 07:36 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday, September 6, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bleh, at no point did I notice that fink installed 1.6.9. I upgraded, then, by looking into its unstabl

Re: dvips Problem, Round III

2003-09-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On Saturday, September 6, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Bleh, at no point did I notice that fink installed 1.6.9. I upgraded, > >> then, by looking into its unstable tree. Now I have 1.7.17 (I checked > >> through --

Re: dvips Problem, Round III

2003-09-06 Thread Will Oram
On Saturday, September 6, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bleh, at no point did I notice that fink installed 1.6.9. I upgraded, then, by looking into its unstable tree. Now I have 1.7.17 (I checked through --version) -- but where's 1.8? Regardless, the error's

dvips Problem, Round III

2003-09-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Bleh, at no point did I notice that fink installed 1.6.9. I upgraded, > then, by looking into its unstable tree. Now I have 1.7.17 (I checked > through --version) -- but where's 1.8? Regardless, the error's still Don't know ; 1.8 was supposed to have hit Fink, but

dvips Problem, Round III

2003-09-06 Thread Will Oram
Bleh, at no point did I notice that fink installed 1.6.9. I upgraded, then, by looking into its unstable tree. Now I have 1.7.17 (I checked through --version) -- but where's 1.8? Regardless, the error's still there, although the nonverbose version reads a teensy bit better. [spamguy:~] spamg

Your Reply to Rent.com

2003-09-06 Thread Rent . com
Hello, You are receiving this automated response because you've sent a message to a Rent.com email address that is not monitored. Your message will NOT be read. In order for us to assist you, please use one of the following web addresses: TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM RENT.COM'S EMAIL SERVICE: http:

Re: dvips Problem, Round II

2003-09-06 Thread David Boersma
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Will Oram wrote: > I'm pretty sure it's not my code's fault. > > After five test files -- three from Mutopia, one from examples, and one > from templates -- the same error occurs. The simplest code that I used, > for example (found here: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v1.8/input/tem

Fml status report (Kuser ML)

2003-09-06 Thread Kuser-admin
ATTENTION! Your mail is too big, so not processed!!! (BThis ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> restricts the maximum mail size, (Bso pay attention to the mail with e.g. attachments. (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED], Be Seeing You! (B (B (B (B Hel