Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, if you're using some sort of UNIX, as most Lily users probably
> > do, you'll be using PostScript instead of PDF, and you don't need
> pfa
> > fonts or all those tools.
>
> Yes, but as soon as you want to publish your scores
> on WWW or ema
Hello,
Using gcc 3.2 and flex 1.5.19 (ftp://ftp.uncg.edu/people/wlestes/), and
thanks to advices from Joerg Anders (thanks a lot), I manage to compile
lilypond 1.6.2 by adding :
using namespace std;
at the top of lily/lexer.ll
I report this in the hope that it will be useful for other users..
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Atte Andre Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1) "apg-get install -t unstable" gave me lily 1.6.0, which makes me wonder
> > what the policies are concerning when (how soon) to find which version of
> > lily in stable/frozen/unstable...???
>
>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
...
> lexer.ll: In member function `virtual int My_lily_lexer::yylex()':
> lexer.ll:227: `cerr' undeclared (first use this function)
> lexer.ll:227: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
> function it appears in.)
>
>
Pierre wrote:
> Yes the INSTALL.txt and the patches should certainly be updated as the
> C++ ABI has changed with gcc-3.2
> But a better solution would be to have a new version of Flex...
> Has Anybody contacted the Flex team about this ?
>
Hello, Pierre,
Thanks for the advice.
I wrote to t
> Also, if you're using some sort of UNIX, as most Lily users probably
> do, you'll be using PostScript instead of PDF, and you don't need pfa
> fonts or all those tools.
Yes, but as soon as you want to publish your scores
on WWW or email it to others, you probably want to
use PDF instead.
Reg
Carter Brey wrote:
> Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I know it's pretty "bleeding-edge", but I have recently upgraded my
>> system to gcc-3.2 and encounter problems when trying to compile
>> lilypond 1.6.2 (as expected after the reading of INSTALL.txt)...
>
>
> For what it's worth
Hi!
If the music this is:
notes {
time 2/4
% 1
g'4 a'4 |
% 2
f'4 g'4 |
% 3
g'4 a'4 |
% 4
f'4 r4 |
% 5
g'4 a'4 |
% 6
f'4 g'4 |
% 7
g'4 a'4 |
% 8
f'4 r4 |
}
Is it possibile this repeat volta ?
notes {
time
Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know it's pretty "bleeding-edge", but I have recently upgraded my
> system to gcc-3.2 and encounter problems when trying to compile
> lilypond 1.6.2 (as expected after the reading of INSTALL.txt)...
For what it's worth, after struggling not only with Li
On 2002.09.09 18:25 Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know it's pretty "bleeding-edge", but I have recently upgraded my
> system to gcc-3.2 and encounter problems when trying to compile
> lilypond 1.6.2 (as expected after the reading of INSTALL.txt)...
>
> So, I've followed the instruct
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> it was "Suggested" to have these, but not "Required". Perhaps if
>> ./configure was a stubborn about these as python and guile?
>
> That's a possibility, unfortunately mftrace requires autotrace and
> t1utils, so we have kind of a domino dependency
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> "Alex Langley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > They should be available, ie, there should be nothing 'to fix' on
> > > Linux. Did you build LilyPond yourself? Did you build and install
> > > the pfa fonts? M
12 matches
Mail list logo
