[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I would like to put a plug in for "stupid mode" (sorry, a better word fails
> me now) that tries to work around things like the start-with-chord feature
> and/or warns a user if they're about to run into that sort of problem. The
To work around these things is hard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
> ---
>
> The output of lilypond -V generate_document.ly ends with:
> ---
> Now processing: `../../ly/generate-documentation.ly'
> Parsing...[/usr/local/share/lilypond/ly/init.ly[/usr/l
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Actually, when you have come this far in the compilation process,
> you do actually have the program, the only thing missing is
> the documentation. So, either you could run 'make install' and
> follow Han-Wen's instructions or you could use the full
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Han-Wen wrote:
>
> > > make[2]: Entering directory
> > > Now processing: `../../.././ly/generate-documentation.ly'
> > > Parsing...Backtrace:
> > > 0* all-visible
> > >
> > > ERROR: In expression all-visible:
> > > ERROR: Unbound variable: all-
> > Curious. What does
> >
> > ldd lilypond
> >
> > say? What does
> >
> > lilypond -V ly/generate-documentation.ly
> >
> > say?
>
> Nothing sensible since I don't _have_ a program called 'lilypond'. The above
> error is from trying to compile it...
Actually, when you have come this fa
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Han-Wen wrote:
> > make[2]: Entering directory
> > `/home/ville/rpms/lilypond-1.5.50/Documentation/user'
> > cd ./out && ../../.././lily/out/lilypond ../../.././ly/generate-documentation
> > GNU LilyPond 1.5.50
> > Now processing: `../../.././ly/generate-documentation.ly'
>
Ah. Got it.
Yes, I read through the tutorial, but did not "work through" it- I read it
and afterwards used it for reference rather than trying to create my own
versions of each example concept.
The whole system becomes much clearer if thought of as a programming system
rather than a music-e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > program to use. In your case, it's the program "makeinfo"
> > that's missing. Install Texinfo, remove config.cache,
> > rerun configure and everything should work.
>
> Yep, texinfo was missing (thankyou Mats and H-W). That error is
> gone, so cue the next one... 'mak
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> It is an indication that configure didn't find the actual
> program to use. In your case, it's the program "makeinfo"
> that's missing. Install Texinfo, remove config.cache,
> rerun configure and everything should work.
Yep, texinfo was missing (than
Title: ½Å¿ë»çȸ ±¸ÃàÀ» À§ÇÑ µðÁöÅÐ ³×Æ®¿÷ ·ÐÅõ¾î!!
> Hi again !
>
> I have last two ( I hope :)) ) problems in my music ...
>
> 1. numbering of measures has gone ! ... i don't understand why .. :(
> 2. last five lines have doubled their ending bars :( --> i don't know
> how to remove it
>
> perhaps #1 depends on #2 ?
Yes, they are both sympto
>
> Thanks to everyone who replied to my problem. I hadn't noticed that
> the absence of guile-config is a known problem (I assumed the error
> was somewhere else than in the rpm).
>
> I compiled guile from scratch and configure ran fine. However, 'make all'
> and 'make install' both choke on wh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I have found about "Point and Click" in the wikiwike site.
> >
> > Does it run unders windows2K?
>
> no.
In theory it should work under Windows as long as you use
Yap from MiKTeX to view the .dvi files, since Yap supports
source specials. The problem is that Y
INTERNET DEN DAHA UCUZA ALýN
Ýnternetden alýndýðýndaki fiyatý
Telefon ile alýndýðýndaki fiyatý
16x DVD Rom
Pioneer
116
52$
> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Han-Wen> I didn't have time to write a reply myself, but this slashdot comment
Han-Wen> excellently summarizes why I think that XML for lilypond is a complete
Han-Wen> waste of time:
I agree with that for now. However,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> One thing I'm interested in - has anyone thought of using XML as a
> neutral definition language in front of LilyPond? Potentially more
> verbose, but there are potential benefits as well. (Probably will start
> this as a separate thread if I get any takers on this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>http://www.lilypond.org/stable/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Context-properties.html
> seems to imply that "Properties that are set in one context are inherited by
> all of the contained contexts."
>
> But I have not found this to be true. For example,
> \pro
17 matches
Mail list logo
