> Sorry I wasn't a little more clear in first Email.
> Its just that a more immediate method of displaying a screen output in
> a page layout would go a long way to making
> Linux computerized music typesetting more efficient.
>
> To answer as to whether or not I'm a troll, well, if I was I sure
Sorry I wasn't a little more clear in first Email.
Its just that a more immediate method of displaying a screen output in
a page layout would go a long way to making
Linux computerized music typesetting more efficient.
To answer as to whether or not I'm a troll, well, if I was I sure
wouldn't b
Hi!
I just installed lilypond-1.4.9-1 from the RPM on my RH7.2 box.
I had lilypond running fine last summer with RH7.1.
If I try to run ly2dvi over a lilypond file I made
last summer, here's what I get as output :
> ly2dvi Estek.ly
>Running LilyPond...
> -I /home/eric/EcritureMus/Lily -H dedic
Hello,
first, let me take the opportunity to thank Laura and Mats for their help last
time. The stanza numbers now look very nice in my songs. (Is there a particular
reason why two variables LyricsVoice.stz and LyricsVoice.stanza must be set?)
However, I'm not satisfied with the lyrics alignmen
sorry, I've forgot the attachment
--
http://www.thomas.willhalm.de/
\header {
mutopiatitle = "Macht hoch die T\"{u}r, die Tor macht weit"
mutopiacomposer = "Halle 1704"
mutopiapoet = "Georg Weißel vor 1623"
mutopiainstrument = "Voice"
date = ""
source = "Gotteslob"
style = "Hymn"
copyri
To prevent the "Lily was here" line you put 'tagline = ""' in the
header block:
\header{
title = "A song"
composer = "me"
tagline = ""
}
Russell
Ton 't Lam writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a convenient way to enter Lilypond in Lyx.
> I don't mean to create a PS file
Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb:
> Btw, I've never quite understood, what *is* the advantage of Lyx over
> Emacs+auctex? This is a valid latex file, to be preprocessed by
> lilypond-book:
It's much easier if you used MS word. It has a GUI and you don't
need to know every command to write a document.
two compile errors on lily 1.5.28
Hi all,
First, happy new year for all.
Second, I have 2 errors on Lilypond-1.5.28:
1. a classical error kpathsea not found,
2. python/Python.h not present.
Here are the reports:
Thanks for your help.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rao
"Ton 't Lam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a convenient way to enter Lilypond in Lyx.
I don't know much about Lyx. Does Lyx allow verbatim latex inserts?
If so, try inserting
\begin{lilypond}
a b c
\end{lilypond}
and replace the compiling command 'latex' with a lilypond-book
Hello,
Is there a convenient way to enter Lilypond in Lyx.
I don't mean to create a PS file and ps2epsi, and then
have a full A4 page anyway. Thus if I enter one line
of music it will be expanded to one page anyway.
I also say 'Lily was here'. How to prevent that. I'm
happy to add a 'Hall of Fam
[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]
> charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Hoping I'm not feeding a troll...]
Same feeling! :-) I appreciate that everyone stays polite. :-)
Let me wish you all a nice and musicful year.
--
François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Hoping I'm not feeding a troll...]
> Is there an absolute need for the midi interface in Lilypond?
A need for whom/for what?
> Is the spacing of its output totally dependant on being midi functional?
The engraving and performance output are independent. H
Is there an absolute need for the midi interface in Lilypond?
Is the spacing of its output totally dependant on being midi functional?
Could Lilypond be ported without the midi function or are there historic
versions without midi?
What I would really like to see is a true music notation program
13 matches
Mail list logo
