Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Antoniouk Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is a little strange that lilypond have no ability to do it -
> > music with lot of staccato notes is common case.
>
> That is not strange if you consider LilyPond is a typesetter, not an
> ed
Hi,
I have music that I wish to fit on a single page. An obvious way to
start is to reduce the font size globally. However, I can find no
easy way to do this. I'm a relative beginner at lilypond and can't
seem to figure out how to apply a font-relative-size setting
globally. Can anybody assis
hello,
how can i ask:
- no page number on the first page
- page numbers to be like this:
- 12 -
in the footer and centered
thanks,
david
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> ...
thanks so much
> > #(define f '((bold italic) "f"))
>
> If you want the same layout as given by \f, you should use
> ((dynamic) "e")m ((dynamic) "ff"), ((dynamic) "ppp")
> and so on.
yes, but the reason i wanted to define some is because i find that the
default fon
Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be a lot easier to use a macro in emacs so the resulting .ly
> > file would be readable?
>
> Nope - Emacs-macros are hard to revert. - Suppose that you suddenly
> regret it...
>
> -Rune
I think I didn't put it the right way
Antoniouk Sergio wrote:
> Proposed solution is not good enough because I don't want to set
> staccato mark for each note in piece, just for most of them like
> this
>
> c-. d-. e-. f g a-. h-. c-. d e-. f-. g-. a h-. ... and so on
But then I do not understand how you would prefer the syntax..
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier to use a macro in emacs so the resulting .ly
> file would be readable?
Nope - Emacs-macros are hard to revert. - Suppose that you suddenly
regret it...
-Rune
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EM
> Hello,
>
> i am trying to typeset some piece i wrote several years ago, and so far so good,
> i got the first 2 mesures! have a couple of thing to ask (or say) (my lilypond
> file content is below) before to go ahead
>
>i use GNU LilyPond 1.5.14.jcn1
>
>[it's ok for me to wait for bug
Antoniouk Sergio wrote:
>
> > > I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
> > > better way then type a lot of "-." like this
> > > "c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
> >
> > You could probably do a Scheme function that adds the scripts
> > to each note and use it
Antoniouk Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a little strange that lilypond have no ability to do it -
> music with lot of staccato notes is common case.
That is not strange if you consider LilyPond is a typesetter, not an
editor or macro processor.
> Proposed solution is not good eno
> > I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
> > better way then type a lot of "-." like this
> > "c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
>
> You could probably do a Scheme function that adds the scripts
> to each note and use it like
> \apply #add-staccato \theMusic
> I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
> better way then type a lot of "-." like this
> "c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
You could probably do a Scheme function that adds the scripts
to each note and use it like
\apply #add-staccato \theMusic
but that req
I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
better way then type a lot of "-." like this
"c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
And second question: can I set different times for different staves?
For example "\time 4/4" for right piano hand, and "\time 3/4" for
left?
13 matches
Mail list logo