.
Unless something of this sort happens, the web and the docs are not
guaranteed to be in step.
Thoughts?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
me and any
comment I may have included.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Regtest 2.17.13
Phil Holmes writes:
> I've run my pixel comparator
Nice. Is there any reason for not runni
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: Regtest 2.17.13
Phil Holmes writes:
> Mainly, it's written in C# on windows, so it
> couldn't a
Trevor
It's a bug in 2.17.12. Upgrade to 2.17.13.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
bug.
Thanks, both. I can live with it for a couple of weeks. I need the
spanbars.
Trevor
If it gets on your nerves, you could downgrade to 2.17.11.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
, but it seems a fairly simple way to make an alternative regtest
checker.
There's lots of improvements that could be made: parallelism, using
something other than diff, but it basically works.
Thoughts?
--
Phil Holmes
ComparePix.sh
Description: Binary data
MakeNewPix.sh
Description: B
- Original Message -
From:
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker
On 1 mars 2013, at 22:33, David Kastrup wrote:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
There's lots of improvements that c
x27;ve done some more work on the comparison and will post an update once it's
worth demonstrating. Not sure when that will be - rehearsing and college
work is pressing.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
o provide the right syntax, I would be very grateful.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:15 PM
Subject: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker
4 files attached. To try this out: create a new directory and place
NoTagline.ly in it. Create a subdirectory calle
7;m just catching up with posts on the various Lily mailing lists, so
please excuse me if I appear to comment on posts that are well over a
month old!
It's good to be back.
Cheers,
Ian
And hope you've recovered well from whatever kept you away.
--
Phil Holmes
__
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Rioux"
To: "LilyPond Devel"
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker
On 01/03/2013 2:15 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
4 files attached. To try this out: create a new directory and p
nge causing the problem.
Can't build a new release until this is attended to, so help is required,
please.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
For me, and for http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/. Guess we wait a
while and then try to contact the admin.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: GUB error with unpure-pure-container.cc
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I accidentally mucked up some of my GUB set up,
s setting the freeze
down the line without being able to wrap up work first.
Cheers,
MS
On a practical note, I have 2 weeks off college immediately after Easter, so
that would be a good time for me to work through the additional stuff a
major release entai
ebb1f1f1.
I've taken the liberty to cc Han-Wen because he wrote the code in the
first place, as well as David because he's usually interested in
consistency and polishing rough edges.
thanks,
Janek
Without doubt, lyrics that are only a single no
been
used, it changes the default paper-size for all output created with that
instance of lilypond. I've read the NR and I know it's supposed to affect
the whole of the scope it applies to, but not surely all the subsequent
files in a multi-run jo
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: Paper size bleeds across lilypond runs
David Kastrup writes:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Invoking lilypond using the read-file-list option and job-count of 9,
I ge
FWIW, this was down to me removing the very out-of-date Czech news file from
the build. The simple cure for problems like this is to make doc clean and try
again. Failing that, delete the build directory and run make, make doc again.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From
ple, 2656. A number of
people have looked at this, and no resolution has been proposed. If we know
we can't fix something which has never been right, I don't see how we can
block a stable release.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing
In the command index of the NR, we have an entry for DS al Fine:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/lilypond-index#lilypond-index_cp_letter-D
However, it's not mentioned at all in the manual. Should we delete the
index entry?
--
Phil H
ne per month anyway.
Have a good climb. Too cold for that malarkey in the UK.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've taken the liberty of writing some instructions on how to use my
pixel-comparator script and pushing them directly to staging. I've
patchy-ed them into master. If anyone wants to try using this script, the
instructions are now there.
--
P
this means those regtests should be changed?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
think?
--
Phil Holmes
<><>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
docs and stable docs.
I'm not sure whether this a bug in the snippet or the enhancement.
--
Phil Holmes
<><>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ore we go anywhere with a new stable
release. So, currently, step one is to reduce them to zero. Step 2 is to
propose and agree a development freeze. Step 3 is to get some release
candidates out.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lil
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Werner LEMBERG" ;
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Stable release state
"Phil Holmes" writes:
At present, we're actually premature in proposing a
is and making it better - exactly what
we've considered to be a tweak. IMO fine-tuning is a perfectly acceptable
description - retouching would not work.
The tuning/tweak stuff potentially arises from a motoring connotation -
"Demon Tweeks" (commercial spelling) were well kn
lilypad/, so
I'm not sure how it's actually downloaded by GUB.
Anyway - is there a way of managing version numbers? It looks like we just
add one to the 3rd digit in the build whenever it's updated. You think
that's true?
Anyt
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel" ; "Graham Percival"
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 4:25 PM
Subject: Updating lilypap, and versions
(Aimed mainly at GP, but copied to -devel).
Graham - if you've followed any of the discussion
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: Updating lilypap, and versions
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
So
I presume the first step to
t, although I think I
was the last person to mess with it. If either Arnold or Eluze can create a
patch, I'd be happy to test it once my rush of college work is over (end of
May).
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-
ectly.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPad
2013/4/28 Phil Holmes :
Windows hackers may be interested to note that I have updated lilypad so
that:
* it's
nd click link between the PDF viewer and an editor is as it
always was, and is the area you were working with Arnold on. What I've done
is update LilyPad so that using the correct row and column on the command
line takes the cursor to the correct point of the .ly file - it di
ired there?
I believe it's simply handled by the registry entry:
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\textedit\shell\open\command]
I have:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPondV2.17.17\usr\bin\guile.exe" -e main -s
"C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPondV2.17.17\usr\bin\lilypond-invoke-edit
ression
in the search field...
Werner
Yes.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
rst in the list.
Does anyone apart from Graham have permissions to change this?
Trevor
As Graham said, I could do "it" if I knew what "it" is. It might be worth
raising this as an issue on the Google code tracker?
--
Phil Holmes
__
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; ;
Cc: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Issue 3223 in lilypond: Document known issue with Ottava
bracketin one voice
Phil, you wrote Wednesday, M
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; ;
Cc: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Issue 3223 in lilypond: Document known issue with Ottava
bracketin one voice
Phil, you wrote
Done that.
the changes I did
manually on my computer: I removed the file extension .scm from
lilypond-invoke-editor in the textedit-open command, and I removed »-e
main«
in both the textedit-open and the scm-file-open command.
ArnoldTheresius
This is something for me to do before the next L
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=573
The new, not yet approved one:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=877
Should the newer snippet _replace_ the older or is it worth a second
snippet?
-Harm
I would retitle the 2nd to "An alternative way to create..." and reference
the
Not AFAICS. We use Google for issue reporting and nothing else. The only
"downloads" are things like images associated with bugs/ enhancements. It
looks to me like this is associated with downloading code (or possibly source).
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
F
it's necessary also to update
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/tree/master/pictures because this
is where the website build sources the pictures. If GP is reading this, he
could confirm.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailin
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG"
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: fixing PNG images
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:56:43AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I believe that it's necessary also to update
https://github.com/gperciva/lily
ross fingers
programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered
for #'adjacent-pure-heights (VerticalAxisGroup)
continuing, cross fingers
Segmentation fault
Don't know whether this is the same problem as you've been having.
Looks like I edited the wrong version level. I'll correct this into
staging, and it will be a few hours then before it works its way through
into master and onto the website.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gn
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: ; "Werner LEMBERG"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: fixing PNG images
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG"
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: fixi
ession.
There are other similar reports:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2968
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3318
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/m
p://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/lilydev) then
posting the updated files to the developer list should allow someone to test
them and get them reviewed. I'm too busy to do this myself right now, but
could help after mid-June.
--
Phil Holmes
_
Or if they want evidence that we control the site, I could put something about
the proposed blog in the news.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Federico Bruni
To: Janek Warchoł
Cc: LilyPond Developmet Team ; Graham Percival ; Phil Holmes
Sent: Saturday, June 01
lyrics. I couldn't
find a bug report that's relevant.
Using 2.17.19, but it's pretty much the same in 2.12.3
--
Phil Holmes
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
o get fixes for 3363 and 3386 into the code base before
cutting a release candidate. I think 3386 is a simple revert, but don't
have time to do it right now.
I'd prefer to declare 2.17.next_increment as a release candidate; let that
stand and if it's OK, cut 17.95 as a final
uld be totally separate,
while from the reader's point of view they would be parts of the same
whole. For me that sounds like a perfect solution.
What do you think about it? Jan/Graham, would it be difficult to
create such subdomain for you?
best,
Janek
--
Phil Holmes
__
found.
Can't we add the lilypond-doc gettext creation to the begin of a normal
build,
too?
I think this is somewhat non-trivial, but would be happy to look at how it
could be done. However - if you know a simple way, from my point of view
please feel free to propose a patch. If not,
- Original Message -
From: "Bernardo Barros"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
Here it is, thanks
(Copying to devel. Problem is a build failure on Fedora. Original text is
- Original Message -
From: "Bernardo Barros"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "lilypond-user" ; "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
Phil: I can confirm your solution avoided the problem, thanks a bunc
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Bernardo Barros"
Cc: "Devel" ; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
- Original Message -----
From: "Bernardo Barros"
To: &q
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
I might be willing to do this (since there are no other volunteers).
Can i see this web app?
Private email sent.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
resorted to nuking my git
directory too...
Before you do this, though, go through the steps above with a "good" git
tree and instead of running make doc, run make -d doc &> somefile.txt. Then
zip the output and send it my way some convenient way.
--
Phil Holmes
_
I've added a few updates to the CG concerning regression tests - it answers
some FAQs that have come up about regtest comparison. I took the liberty of
a direct push as 173c86fbf69abf076ec9c16147c1bf106c52b541
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-
ake runs, I get
make[2]: Entering directory
`/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/lilypond-git/build/Documentation/topdocs'
(as above), but nothing is built - so I'm not sure why it's suddenly decided
to build NEWS.tely.
Is anyone else seeing this? Anyone aware of why this is happening?
--
I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Graham Percival"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:05 AM
Subject: RE: Problem with make
hello,
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
David Kastrup writes:
"pkx1...@gmail.com" writes:
hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my fast b
t;make", so my guess would be that the
dependencies
of our texinfo files are not complete.
Cheers,
Reinhold
I was getting it when I went from make -j9 to make -j5, but didn't want to
be bothered with running a single core. I'm assuming you're correct,
though.
--
Phi
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Janek Warchoł"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; ;
"Aleksandr Andreev" ;
; ;
;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062)
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011
ite with no pictures. make
tries to copy them but they're only created during make doc. To get the
images, on a normal make build, you must run make doc before make website.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.
7; section of 'git push --help' " but
it didn't help me at all. Could anyone point me to what the problem is and
how to fix it, please?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
d out-of-tree build.
Can someone check this?
Checked and confirmed. Fresh build directory, new pull.
We probably need to learn how to use git bisect...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:44 PM
Subject: Problem with git push
On my new machine, I get:
phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lily
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September
I'm just trying to push a single commit on master.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Bertrand Bordage
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org ; David Kastrup
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
You can specify
e sole commit which is on the latest
version of master.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Bertrand Bordage
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org ; David Kastrup
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
The commit you
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Bertrand Bordage" ; "David Kastrup"
;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
I've just used lily-gi
f in 15.12 and 15.10, but that's a starter.
--
Phil Holmes
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
"Phil Holmes" writes:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first
is shown in the Les Nerei
- Original Message -
From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
Simply fetch from the server:
git pull --rebase
Well, I was sure I must have done that at one point, but I've done it now
and success :-) Thanks Reinhold.
--
Phil Holmes
_
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Bernardo Barros" ; "Devel"
; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:08:26AM +01
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
- Original Message -
From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
Simply fetch from the server:
git pull --reb
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Berna
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes&q
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
There are 2 significant pr
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'd like to add a note to th
and get a user
report same day.
Given the shenanigans needed to create it, might it make sense to retire it?
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html)
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
to get make doc going?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: Big web page
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:03:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
You know, I'm wondering if this serves a
this? If not -
can we define one?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Big web page
2011/9/23 Phil Holmes :
You know, I'm wondering if this serves any purpose. It's a humungous
thi
grace note makes musical sense - it's an ornamentation of briefly playing
one note before switching to another. Having them tied is a bit like a
single note trill or turn?
\relative c''' {
c1(
\slashedGrace d8 c2
\acciaccatur
Or I will be from today. I'm off to the first day of freshers' week in a
few minutes. This week it's pretty much full time with fresher's
activities. Fairly part-time from next week. Just need to sign up for all
those clubs I'll neve
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Janek Warchol" ; "Devel"
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: Big web page
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:32:59PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
So - going on
g?
Cheers,
MS
Possibly a push I just made. The doc compiled clean on my system, but it
looks like it won't run full make. Leave it with me - I'll get it fixed
pronto.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.
g?
Cheers,
MS
make is now clean on my system and changes pushed to master. Sorry for
wasting your time. Interesting oddity that you can edit a document, make
the pdf OK, but the change still breaks make. Just about to try make doc to
be sure, but if you pull now make should be OK.
Justin,
Janek normally helps with patches like this, but he's away from home at
present. If you don't get further response, could you try again in about a
week when he's back. Alternatively, could one of the other devs have a look at
the patch, please?
--
Phil Holmes
://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1926).
As I don't use Windows to compile LilyPond, can someone test it?
AFAIK, the only way to get a Windows build is with GUB - so it's pretty much
only Graham who can do this. Please correct me if I'm wrong, and I'll test
it if I can ge
think the message above only came to me?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string.
(issue5233042)
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:27:52PM +0100, Phil Holmes wro
601 - 700 of 2094 matches
Mail list logo
