Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Graham Percival :
>
> > CG! CG! CG! :)
>
> By the way, one sensible addition to the CG might be to invite Windows
> users to do
>
> git config global.autocrlf = false
>
> or something like that (by default under Windows, git conv
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/1/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > The next Windows Git installer will let the user choose which strategy
> > to take.
>
> Great! You have no idea how much hair I have been pulling out about this
> :-)
A
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Valentin Villenave wrote Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:30 PM
>
> > By the way, one sensible addition to the CG might be to invite Windows
> > users to do
> >
> > git config global.autocrlf = false
> >
> > or something like that (by default under Wi
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Joe Neeman wrote:
> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFAIK you have
to be accepted as an organization, and you have to apply for that.
Ciao,
Dscho
_
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> >>> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
> >>
> &g
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Anne Ghisla wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > > > On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nien
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
> music streams infrastructure.
That would be nice.
> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Ciao,
Dscho
P
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
Not true. For example, Drupal had a SoC project that was
documentation-only, and I imagine other projects had as well.
> A full list of possible projects is on the google issue
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > - the mentor is also expected to work almost full time at least in the
> > beginning,
>
> Sorry, but from my experience with mentoring KDE projects,
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > - just mentioning their wishes, as others have done, is likely to be a
> > waste of time, not to mention an annoyance to the others, as _there
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Shouldn't we start collecting possible project ideas (not only for SoC,
> but for any possible newcomer to LilyPond, so that we don't have to
> point them to the bug tracker telling him/her to simply choose a bug and
> work on that, which ca
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Paul Scott wrote:
> dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009, Trevor Daniels said:
> >
> > > The names are case-insensitive, and they cannot be used as directory
> > > names or the first part of a filename (the bit before the dot).
> >
> > please not
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
> can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
> [...]
Thanks you for bringing it to the proper place. I've been meaning to, but
got too swamped in work.
It did not exactly help my
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >
> > Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
> >
> > My understanding is that
> >
> > a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> - How could differently-written names for a given author to be joined on
> one?
I guess you could write a .mailmap:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-shortlog.html
(section "FILES").
Ciao,
Dscho
__
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> $ zip opera_libre.zip `find opera_libre/ |grep -v '.git'
>
> 2009/2/5 Valentin Villenave :
> > Hmm... You do have a point. I tend to assume anybody familiar enough
> > with LilyPond knows what a tgz archive means, but I could find a way
> > to do a
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > How about
> >
> >$ git archive --prefix=opera_libre/ --format=zip HEAD:
> >
> > ?
>
> It would be just great if repo.or.cz offered this option out-of-the
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > How about
> >
> >$ git archive --prefix=opera_libre/ --format=zip HEAD:
> >
> > ?
>
> It would be just great if repo.or.cz offered this option out-of-th
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Tim Slattery wrote:
> Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> >Hmm... You do have a point. I tend to assume anybody familiar enough
> >with LilyPond knows what a tgz archive means,
>
> I'm reasonable familiar with Lilypond at this point, but I had to
> google tgz to find out wha
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:36:24PM -0700, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> > In the instructions for getting the source code, why not just use
> > git-clone? Is there a difference? The currently suggested method of
> > remote-add + checkout produces a bun
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > 3. I'm not certain if git-clone sets up everything for doing
> > "git pull origin" and "git push origin".
>
> Yes, it does set things up properly. I first acquired the repo using
> the git-clone command and now I gr
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:53:06PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > > 1. git-clone gets the entire repo, not just the particular
> > > branch that you want.
> >
> > Indeed, but as Git is pretty
Hi.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch by
> comparing my local (changed) file with the corresponding file in the
> remote git repository?
No, it creates patches from commits. So you use Git as usual:
(inspec
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:57:39PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > > Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch b
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > > Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch
> > > by comparing my local (changed) file with the cor
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Again, Johannes, many thanks for your patience in explaining this to a
> non-developer. :)
You are very welcome!
Thank you for your contributions,
Dscho
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I realized after I sent it, though, that I sent it from my Thunderbird
> email client and this historically has jacked up the line endings.
We had a very "interesting" discussion with one of the Thunderbirds on the
Git list (who I dragged into th
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > > I realized after I sent it, though, that I sent it from my Thunderbird
> > > email client and thi
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> > More seriously, the patch doesn't apply here because
> > your line numbering seems to be 1 off from the line
> > numbers I have in git-starting.itexi. I have no idea
> > why that should be. I believe my git repo is ful
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > No need to reclone. Just rename the current branch:
> >
> > $ git branch -m old.branch
> >
>
> This part seemed to work fine.
>
> > And then start anew (in the s
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Oriolus wrote:
> My malware scanner Norman discovered a trojan after installation of LilyPond:
> Location: C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\guile.exe
> Trojan: W32/Smalldrp.ARAH
Are you sure? These files are cross-compiled from Linux, so there is
litt
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, John Mandereau wrote:
> > It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try
> > building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without
> > reverting to their secret knowledge.
>
> I spent a lot of time testing compilation and installation of In
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try
> > building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without
> > reverting to their secret knowledge.
>
> Is it really necessary to get nasty?
Like I said in another
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> as always, patches will be thoughtfully considered.
> >
> > It appears a bit disingenuous to me to answer "I can't figure out what
> > does what and why" with "congratulations, then it is your task to
> > figure this out to a degree where yo
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 20 mars 09 à 00:38, John Mandereau a écrit :
> >
> > >2) I might organize European vacations around other lilypond
> > > contributors, starting with a weekend in Paris. (not because I
> > > particularly want to see Paris -- I spent four d
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/3/18 Graham Percival :
>
> > 2) I might organize European vacations around other lilypond
> >contributors, starting with a weekend in Paris. (not because I
> >particularly want to see Paris -- I spent four days there about 10
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>
> > I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is
> > it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
> - the LilyPond plugin for medi
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I think their concern that Scheme is needed to do anything useful is
> > unfounded, and that Scheme just should be disabled for the purpose of
> > the MediaWiki extensi
Hi,
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
> On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> >Dewdman,
> >It might help to read this:
> >http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
>
> Very interesting link! It might as well be called "In Defense of Being a
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
> >People like you seem to confuse the concept of "polite" with "servant".
>
> Ah yes, people like me. People who confuse concepts. People who are not
> as brilliant as yourself.
Aaron, it would be good to earn some respect here, presumably by
Hi Aaron,
by sending a private exchange you proved something. You still have not
earned respect with this person.
I would have appreciated a lot of things, such as actually addressing the
original poster's (maybe poorly formulated) concern.
I would have appreciated something which benefits me
Hi,
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Do I have to compile it from source and how do I do that in Windows?
Last time I checked, you could not compile LilyPond on Windows. I tried
hard, with MSys/MinGW, but could not get it to compile due to the vast
number of dependencies.
However,
Hi,
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > And how do I exit the EDIT_COMMITMSG window? I've included an image
> > showing the window. If I click on the X button, the whole git bash
> > shell closes along with it. That can't be right.
It's starting vi.
> Okay, this one I figured out. It
Hi,
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:33:51PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > On 5/24/09 8:40 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think the instructions in the CG just aren't clear enough. Is
> > > anyone out there happily making git patch
Hi,
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> 1.5.2 Installing git
>
> 0) Full installer or portable application?
This is my fault; PortableGit is a recent addition. I'd recommend the
installer (but not the "full" installer available from
msysgit.googlecode.com).
> 1) Describe Windows Ex
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:05 AM
>
> > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> >
> > > 1.5.2 Installing git
> > >
> > > 0) Full installer or portable application?
>
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:53 AM
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> >
> > > Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:05 AM
> > >
> > &
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> When I installed git, I selected Unix style line endings.
> Now every time I or even
> I get this warning for *each* modified file:
>
> warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in .
Please do not top-post. At least remove the stuff you are not reply
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings.
>
> Trevor, could you do a quick search for the fixes you've pushed, and
> identify the patches that caused the problem?
You can let Git search for you:
$ git log -S"$(printf "\r"
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > I think you could replace the "input" with "true" in you
> > /etc/gitconfig's autocrlf setting in the [core] section. This should
> > take care of the
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, John Mandereau wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
> > According to
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828
> > a push is precisely what we should do -- since git is a
> > decentralized source control system, that will upload all the
> > missing history.
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:10 PM
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > > When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings.
> > >
> > > Trevor, could
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> >
> > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
>
> And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> cut the network transfer by more than half
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> > >
> > > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
> >
> > And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> > cut t
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <20090614225255.ga7...@nagi>, Graham Percival
> writes
> >2) I don't know what the current favorite fancy IDE is, although
> >I'm fairly certain that Eclipse runs on Linux. I'm not certain if
> >that would actually be good for Li
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:49:12AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Thanks for adding the info about .git/config
> > [push]
> > default = matching
> >
> > to the CG, Patrick! Bloody git developers and their bloody
> > inconsistent commands
Hi,
as every year, there is a user's survey about Git; Hopefully as every
year, useful and fascinating ideas will crop up!
Ciao,
Johannes
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:22:32 +0200
From: Jakub Narebski
To: g...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Git User's Su
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> As you're aware, I've been working on a patch for autobeaming.
>
> It affects c++, scheme, and documentation files.
>
> Now I want to apply the patch to master. But the problem is that all of
> the documentation files have moved to Documentation
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/26/09 11:35 AM, "Johannes Schindelin"
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >
> >> As you're aware, I've been working on a patch for autobeaming.
> >
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:50AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > A few people talked about browsing the history, which surprised me.
> > Whenever I want to look at history, I use the web git interface. But
> > evidently other people do
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 08:45:22AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> >
> > Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 10, 2009 12:48 AM
> >> I maoing hate git.
> >
> > Git is fine; the complexity comes from the
> > baroque structures in LilyPond. Let's be
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > > We've lost 50% of potential contributors to the website because of
> > > git.
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> > >
> > > > We've lo
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > It actually only gives you a "Clone/Update" button that makes sure
> > that a local clone (hardcoded to $HOME/lilypond) is up-to-date, but at
> > least it has a pr
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > It actually worked here, twice.
> >
> > But you have this wonderful output field in the GUI, what does it have to
> > say? I imagine that it gave you some error message or som
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:25 AM
> >
> > I'm git-weary but still alive. Johannes spent *hours* debugging
> > my problem, and eventually traced it to an undiscovered bug
> > in gitk that only affects Microsoft Windows...
>
> N
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Maximilian Albert <
> maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > P.S.: It would be nice to let the script print a short message when
> > it's finished so that the user know when to stop waiting. ;-)
>
> I had t
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin <
> johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So it doesn't give an error, just a warning. But AFAIR I have seen
> > > this warning
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin <
> > johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > So it doesn'
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> > I pushed a new version to git://repo.or.cz/lilypond/dscho.git. You
> > can download it directly here:
> >
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/dscho.git?a=blob_plain;f=lilycontrib.tcl;hb=lilycontrib
>
> Cool, works like a charm now. Thanks a lo
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I actually had to change the --work-tree things, since it is utter
> > garbage. I _know_ why I was opposed to its inclusion.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > I added tw
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> > Does that mean shallow clones are inadvisable on Windows?
>
> I'll let Johannes confirm, but I think that shallow clones should be
> fine on Windows now. I got the sense that he "killed the beast" last
> night. It was
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/12 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > Fixed and pushed.
>
> Yep, verified. Many thanks once again! I think this can be very useful
> for new contributors.
I hope so.
Maybe you tell me the most common operati
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Michael Käppler wrote:
> Let's assume I've checked out a fresh master/origin and did some commits
> on top of it. How can I concatenate this commits in one to create only
> one patch?
The easiest way I can think of: if your latest, say, 5 commits should be
squashed int
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>> I'm talking about developer tools. For example, some months ago I
> >>> got the advice to use "grep" to browse LilyPond source code.
> >>
> >> BTW, have you found something better?
> >>
> > Eclipse is quite good at finding macro definitions etc
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I used "git rebase -i" to combine several commits into
> one for the first time recently. This was in ubuntu.
> It threw me for a while because the first editor it
> brought up was nano (to edit the list of commits) and
> then vi (to edit the commi
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> It would make life a bit easier for testers who are directly compiling
> from git if the SHA1 number (perhaps the first eight digits only) could
> be shown in the output of
>
> lilypond --version
>
> Any chance to add this?
The common way is
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
[do not know who said that, Bertalan removed that information]
> > I think you don't understand what top posting means: It means that you
> > quote the whole message (and all messages that it quoted) and simply
> > add your reply a
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2010, at 11:50, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> >I repeat: there is no way that our use of Stockhausen would qualify as
> >"fair dealing" under Canadian copyright law. I cannot speak to
> >copyright law in Germany, Sweden, or other jurisdictio
Hi,
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Erlend Aasland wrote:
> Hello Han-Wen
>
> The MacOS package worked very well. No problems on MacOS 10.3.9.
Here on 10.2.8 I have the usual problems about undefined symbols lib
libSystem.B.dylib. Well, I'll have to build it myself, I guess!
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: Upgrading O
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Lots of fixes, --png output still fails mysteriously, cut and pasting
> the gs command by hand works.
Evertime I get something like this, it is either a sh/bash problem, or
(more likely) environment variables.
> Please test.
Will do (on emula
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Stephen wrote:
> OK, I guess I know that and know why. I was resisting because a unified
> patch is larger than the original file. But I am guessing now that that is
> what the "unified" means, containing all of the original file.
The patch seems to be so large only beca
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Pedro Kröger wrote:
>
> I don't know how many people are here or in lily-users, but if
> we could get 100 people to contribute $20 for 6 months, [...]
I am ready to do that.
> Is SCORE still been developed? I remember it used to be *really*
> expensive ($500-1000). Hum,
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We could steal the users directly from there... But for this to
> > happen, we would have to reverse engineer the SCORE format.
>
> hum, it's a binary format
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Thursday 18 August 2005 06.41, Trevor Baca wrote:
>
> As you say, it could be useful to start a constructive dialogue with the
> SCORE folks, to
>
> (a) see what it would require (in terms of improved program design) to
> make them join us.
>
>
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The biggest obstacle to SCORE users probably is the fast changing syntax.
> > They _need_ a reliable format.
>
> I know sometimes it's a PITA to have the for
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > The biggest obstacle to SCORE users probably is the fast changing syntax.
> > They _need_ a reliable format.
>
> I'm almost certain they don't. SCORE for publication material. Once
Hi,
looks good! Though its a pity that there is no embedded LilyPond...
Ciao,
Dscho
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
when I looked at http://lilypond.org/web/switch/howto, and saw the song
example, I nearly fell of my chair. Did anybody actually listen to the
snippet?
I propose
@@ -5,5 +55 @@
\relative c'' {
g2 es8( c4.)
-e8 e d c c2
+f8. f16 es8. d16 c2
}
\addlyrics {
Ciao,
Dscho
Hi,
when I ran lily 2.5.?, it produced a PDF of 50 kB. Now, I upgraded (which
forced me to update almost every package on my system), and it produces a
PDF of 510 kB. Granted, it looks nicer. But it's 10x bigger! Any ideas why
this is so?
Ciao,
Dscho
Hi Graham, hi Erik,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 19-Aug-05, at 5:10 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > when I ran lily 2.5.?, it produced a PDF of 50 kB. Now, I upgraded (which
> > forced me to update almost every package on my system), and it prod
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Graham Percival wrote:
> current CVS, OSX, fink patches and self-compiled.
Concur. What I found irritating is that after #include'ing in
flower/include/real.hh, isinf() is not #define'd, even when it is still
defined when checking within ! I have OSX 10.2.8.
My worka
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 16-Sep-05, at 8:50 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > Concur. What I found irritating is that after #include'ing in
> > flower/include/real.hh, isinf() is not #define'd, even when it is still
> >
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, P B wrote:
> Also, I just saw that one of the original developers is NOT really a fan of
> C++; if you were to try again today, what language would you use and why? I'm
> mostly familiar with C++ and Java (yeah, big diff there, I know), but I'm
> wondering about using the
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The entry point is main(). Good luck.
;-) I did that. It is funny to trace the execution path through 3 scheme
functions (which could be streamlined, I guess) and back to C++.
> > Also, I just saw that one of the original developers is NOT rea
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> Citerar Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > No, C++ and Java are much the same: statically typed imperative
> > > prrogramming languages, with support for object orientation. I
> > > think I would
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> Citerar Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > It is a dependency since you
> >
> > - need to have it installed in order to compile LilyPond
> > - need to understand TeX in order to be able to read
iling examples.itely, the regexp handling would choke on
a string which was longer than a certain fixed size (IIRC 32kB).
So, maybe configure should fail when Python is older than 2.3?
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/user/GNUmakefile |
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Graham Percival wrote:
> I don't understand most of these patch,
I'll try to explain:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/user/GNUmakefile b/Documentation/user/GNUmakefile
> > index 6ab1df3..9b9821a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/user/GNUmakefile
> > +++ b/Documentation/user/
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
>
> On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > > I don't understand
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
