Le dimanche 02 avril 2023 à 18:20 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> Essentially, this option switches between the `show` and `glyphshow`
> PostScript operators to access Emmentaler glyphs. The former is
> considered the 'standard' method for accessing glyphs in a PS file
> (according to the GS dev
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le dimanche 02 avril 2023 à 18:20 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>> Essentially, this option switches between the `show` and `glyphshow`
>> PostScript operators to access Emmentaler glyphs. The former is
>> considered the 'standard' method for accessing glyphs in a PS
>>> Essentially, this option switches between the `show` and `glyphshow`
>>> PostScript operators to access Emmentaler glyphs. The former is
>>> considered the 'standard' method for accessing glyphs in a PS file
>>> (according to the GS developers); however, it needs properly set up
>>> encoding
> Le 3 avr. 2023 à 15:34, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
> Yes. There is no equivalent to `glyphshow` in PDF. For some comments
> on that see, for example,
>
> https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698305#c10
> https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695259
OK, thanks.
> BTW,
Here is the current countdown report.
The next countdown will begin on April 5th.
A list of all merge requests can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority
Push:
!1901 Minor Usage Manual improvements - Werner Lemberg
https://gitlab.com/lily
