Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Hi Ken, On Fri, 2022-05-20 at 11:12 -0700, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Hi Jonas; > > This is cool. > > Question: Will there be support in the future for Apple Silicon? Possibly. We'd need to ask MacStadium for a second node with Apple Silicon (they're already sponsoring the node that I use to

Re: Building lilypond on osx

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 07:49 +0200, Luca Fascione wrote: > As a side question, may I ask: I thought I saw commits pass in > Colin's emails that were indicating GUB and stepmake were being > removed, did I misunderstand what the plan is? Is there a place I can > get myself up to speed on this? (just

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Currently homebrew provides Lilypond 2.22.2 for Apple Silicon, >> that is what I am using. > > Did you try running the x86_64 binaries via Apple's Rosetta tool? That > might be a bit slower than native executables, but given that Homebrew > builds 2.22.2 without Guile bytecode, it might actu

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 11:45 +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >   Currently homebrew provides Lilypond 2.22.2 for Apple Silicon, > > > that is what I am using. > > > > Did you try running the x86_64 binaries via Apple's Rosetta tool? > > That might be a bit slower than native executables, but given

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Note that the MacPorts port of LilyPond 2.22.2 already uses Guile >> 2.2 bytecode and provides a binary for Apple Silicon, too. >> >>   https://ports.macports.org/port/lilypond/details/ > > No, the 2.22.2 version uses Guile 1.8 as can be easily seen from the > dependencies. Even if it used G

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
Hi Jonas; I think that the Rosetta tool only works for x86-64 binaries that were built for Micro$oft. When I try the method as outlined at https://www.imore.com/how-identify-intel-based-apps-m1-mac I don't see any way to select a different execution method (such as Rosetta). I, obviously

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 09:03 -0700, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Hi Jonas; > > I think that the Rosetta tool only works for x86-64 binaries that > were built for Micro$oft. > > When I try the method as outlined at > https://www.imore.com/how-identify-intel-based-apps-m1-mac > I don't see any way

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:15 -0700, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Hi Jonas; > > When trying to execute the lilypond file under bin in the extracted > tarball, I get the following [see attached screenshot] (looks like > usage). Yes, this is what you get when running lilypond without arguments. So it w

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
Hi Jonas; I use lilypond from the command line. How do I invoke the 2.23.9 lilypond executable from the command line instead of using the mouse to context (right-click) from the Finder? Thanks, Ken Ken On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 10:18 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:15

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:29 -0700, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Hi Jonas; > > I use lilypond from the command line. > > How do I invoke the 2.23.9 lilypond executable from the command > line instead of using the mouse to context (right-click) from the > Finder? You just use the full path to it,

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
Hi Jonas; The 'gs' executable could not be verified as safe from malware. I was able to get the mac to accept 'gs' as safe. It now works. Thanks, Ken On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 10:31 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:29 -0700, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > Hi Jonas; > > >

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
Hi Jonas; As an aside, I tried executing all of the items in the bin directory with '--help' to see if they would execute ok. After getting past all of the mac malware warnings about guile, shell, python, etc; I end up with this: == ./lilypond-invoke-editor -

Re: LilyPond 2.23.9 released

2022-05-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 11:04 -0700, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Hi Jonas; > > As an aside, I tried executing all of the items in the bin directory > with '--help' to see if they would execute ok. > > After getting past all of the mac malware warnings about guile, > shell, python, etc; I end up wi

Point an Click & emacs

2022-05-21 Thread Immanuel Litzroth
Today I found out it's quite easy to get point and click working with emacs as pdf viewer when using the pdf-tools package. 1. Install pdf-tools: https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools It's available as a package in emacs. 2. put this in your .emacs config >>> (defconst lilypond-filename-rx (rx (s

Re: Point an Click & emacs

2022-05-21 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 21/05/2022 à 20:56, Immanuel Litzroth a écrit : Today I found out it's quite easy to get point and click working with emacs as pdf viewer when using the pdf-tools package. 1. Install pdf-tools: https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools It's available as a package in emacs. 2. put this in your .

Re: Point an Click & emacs

2022-05-21 Thread Luca Fascione
Jean, I think this is a BWV1079... L On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 9:28 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > Le 21/05/2022 à 20:56, Immanuel Litzroth a écrit : > > Today I found out it's quite easy to get point and click working > > with emacs as pdf viewer when using the pdf-tools package. > > 1. Install