Re: github mirror of lilypond?

Aha! I am in the group that controls this :-) I pushed it up to current master. On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 12:04 AM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > It looks like https://github.com/lilypond was last updated in Jun > 2019. If there was an automated mirror, it has stopped working. Could > someone give it

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 8:35 AM Erlend Aasland wrote: > > Is there a reason _not_ to use GitHub for > development/bugtracking/wiki/planning? The current dev model is, to put it > mildly, and in lack of better words, cumbersome and archaic. GNU licences are > AFAICS supported by GitHub, so that

Re: reviewing granular commits?

see here https://review.gerrithub.io/c/lilypond/lilypond/+/482035/1 for seeing how this change series looks in Gerrit. On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 12:16 AM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > I just made a sequence of random bugfixes, which I cleanly committed > in separate commits, but now I discovered th

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

Am Samstag, den 18.01.2020, 10:38 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 8:35 AM Erlend Aasland < > erlen...@innova.no > > wrote: > > Is there a reason _not_ to use GitHub for > > development/bugtracking/wiki/planning? The current dev model is, to put it > > mildly, and in lack

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

Yes, I’m open for both GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, and similar «complete development environments» (or whatever it’s called.) I’ve been working in GitHub the last years, and it’s so nice to have a decent bugtracker, a great review tool, a great git web interface, and more, all in one place. It really

Looking for help in configuring LilyDev in VirtualBox

I'm slowly working my way through CG Section 2.1, but have reached an impasse. In "Configuring LilyDev in VirtualBox". Step 1 tells me to "install Guest Addition...". That's been changed to "Insert..." but that's obvious. The VBoxGuestAdditions.iso CD is in the virtual drive, but it seems but th

Re: Looking for help in configuring LilyDev in VirtualBox

Hi Peter, Am 18.01.2020 um 13:40 schrieb Peter Toye: I'm slowly working my way through CG Section 2.1, but have reached an impasse. In "Configuring LilyDev in VirtualBox". Step 1 tells me to "install Guest Addition...". That's been changed to "Insert..." but that's obvious. The VBoxGuestAdditi

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

Erlend Aasland writes: > Yes, I’m open for both GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, and similar «complete > development environments» (or whatever it’s called.) I’ve been working > in GitHub the last years, and it’s so nice to have a decent > bugtracker, a great review tool, a great git web interface, and mor

Re: reviewing granular commits?

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > see here > > https://review.gerrithub.io/c/lilypond/lilypond/+/482035/1 > > for seeing how this change series looks in Gerrit. Main problem for running some new software on Savannah is that we'd need volunteers for doing the required system administration. I don't thi

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

On 1/18/2020 5:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote: GitHub is putting our eggs in Microsoft's basket. Not too enthused about that idea. Apparently GNU has some say as well in the matter of repo hosting choice. They also have a report card for various

ly_scm_write_string: call scm_write directly (issue 545450043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/545450043/diff/583370043/lily/lily-guile.cc File lily/lily-guile.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/545450043/diff/583370043/lily/lily-guile.cc#newcode55 lily/lily-guile.cc:55: scm_write(s, port); Well, I was "what the Dickens?" reading this. I suppo

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

On 2020-01-08 at 15:00, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: > GitHub is putting our eggs in Microsoft's basket. Not too enthused about that > idea. If I remember correctly, GitLab had some size restrictions that clearly > are not going to fly with LilyPond. I am not aware of what size limits LilyPo

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

Jahrme Risner writes: > On 2020-01-08 at 15:00, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: > >> GitHub is putting our eggs in Microsoft's basket. Not too enthused about that >> idea. If I remember correctly, GitLab had some size restrictions that clearly >> are not going to fly with LilyPond. > > I am not

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

There was a thread from April 2018 that explored GitLab's suitability for LilyPond. As I recall from that discussion, most of the first-to-mind concerns about available features and workflows seemed like things GitLab could

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

On 1/18/2020 4:59 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development wrote: I strongly dislike Gerrit, it's really hard to learn and even after some time I still can't figure out how to use it correctly. This topic is outside my expertise. But I understood that Gerrit and Rietveld are

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

> While that may be true, there are already GNU projects using GitHub > as their host, for example gnucash and gnuradio. Gnucash uses github as a mirror only, see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git#code.gnucash.org But gnuradio admittedly uses github. I'm 100% sure that if RMS knew that he w

Remove broken and undocumented tracing features (issue 577320043 by jonas.hahnf...@gmail.com)

LGTM, thanks! https://codereview.appspot.com/577320043/

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

Am Sonntag, den 19.01.2020, 07:20 +0100 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > > While that may be true, there are already GNU projects using GitHub > > as their host, for example gnucash and gnuradio. > > Gnucash uses github as a mirror only, see > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git#code.gnucash.org > >

Re: ly_scm_write_string: call scm_write directly (issue 545450043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

Here https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-10/msg00236.html I reported some problems, likely caused by ly_scm_write_string. Once I'll be back from Salzburg I'll try to compile LilyPond against guile-3.0 with the patches linked above and the changes mentioned here: https://lists.g

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:21 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > As it stands, GitLab would probably be a more viable candidate to > > look at than GitHub. > > I agree. IMHO, the main repository should stay at Savannah, though. I strongly disagree with this. If we are serious about code review (and it

Re: github mirror of lilypond?

You can think of Gerrit as Rietveld v2 This somewhat off-topic, but the main reason people dislike Gerrit is that it requires contributors to put a Change-Id line in the bottom of the commit message, see eg. https://review.gerrithub.io/c/lilypond/lilypond/+/482034 As one reworks the series of