Hello Han-Wen,
A presentation on the LilyPond architecture would be helpfull to me. In
particular, detailing the creation and use of grobs, engravers and the like
would be much appreciated.
JM
> Le 5 janv. 2020 à 11:26, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I'll be at the Salzburg m
Hello Han-Wen,
> I'll be at the Salzburg music engraving event.
now registered :-)
> I was wondering if there is anything regarding LilyPond that you
> want my input on.
Being at the conference for the discussions and talks on Sunday is
already a big bonus. I'm sure there will be a lot of q
Sunday, January 5, 2020, 10:28:43 PM, you wrote:
> Am So., 5. Jan. 2020 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Peter Toye :
>> But I'm really not familiar in any detail with the whole patching process,
>> whether or not I use git directly or via LilyDev and/or lily-git and/or
>> git-cl (the relationship between
I find it strange that this code in input/regression/bend-bound.ly ends up on
two staves rather than one:
music = \repeat unfold 16 { c''4\bendAfter #-4 }
sixteens = \repeat unfold 64 { c'16 }
\new Score {
<< \music \sixteens >>
}
I have a pretty good idea of why it is happening, and I am cur
Dan Eble writes:
> I find it strange that this code in input/regression/bend-bound.ly
> ends up on two staves rather than one:
>
> music = \repeat unfold 16 { c''4\bendAfter #-4 }
> sixteens = \repeat unfold 64 { c'16 }
>
> \new Score {
> << \music \sixteens >>
> }
>
> I have a pretty good idea
Am Donnerstag, den 19.12.2019, 20:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Hello friends of Python 3!
>
> to make the initial proposal short: With today's patches, I think
> 'master' would be ready to switch over to Python 3.x.
> As a reminder, Python 2 will go EOL on 1st of January 2020 - in 13 days
>
Am Montag, den 06.01.2020, 19:32 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld <
> hah...@hahnjo.de
> > writes:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, den 19.12.2019, 20:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > Hello friends of Python 3!
> > >
> > > to make the initial proposal short: With today's patches, I think
>
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 19.12.2019, 20:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
>> Hello friends of Python 3!
>>
>> to make the initial proposal short: With today's patches, I think
>> 'master' would be ready to switch over to Python 3.x.
>> 1) Adapt the build system to find and req
On Jan 6, 2020, at 10:57, David Kastrup wrote:
>> the current result is strange
>
> Can you explain why you feel that?
I find it strange that this music produces these diverse results:
music = << c' e' >>
\new Score { % Case A: two notes in one voice
\new Voice \music
}
\new Score { % Case
4. Januar 2020 12:34, "Malte Meyn" schrieb:
> Am 04.01.20 um 12:29 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>
>> But that brings me to another question: Shouldn’t we add the \dynamic >
>> command from openlilylib to
>> vanilla LilyPond? This would allow users to > have “p dolce”, “più f” and
>> ‘exotic’ dynamics l
Dan Eble writes:
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 10:57, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> the current result is strange
>>
>> Can you explain why you feel that?
>
> I find it strange that this music produces these diverse results:
>
> music = << c' e' >>
>
> \new Score { % Case A: two notes in one voice
> \new V
11 matches
Mail list logo
