On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 22:39 -0500, Étienne Beaulé wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I’m Étienne Beaulé and I’ve been making some changes to LilyPond. I
> am also the maintainer of the MediaWiki Score extension which allows
> embedded LilyPond on Wikipedia. I’m currently a bachelor student at
> the Universit
Hello Étienne,
I too think this would be a very promising proposal, and if it would get
closer to an actual application I will surely have some more thoughts on
it too.
Right now it is of course premature to discuss because not even the
*organization* application period has started. So as ev
Original-Nachricht
Folks,
lilypond 2.19.82, the last released development version, is now
available in macports.
Werner
Just curious - why should one use the macports version instead of the
binary provided by lilypond.org?
Thomas
__
Original-Nachricht
Folks,
lilypond 2.19.82, the last released development version, is now
available in macports.
Werner
Just curious - why should one use the macports version instead of the
binary provided by lilypond.org?
Thomas
__
>> lilypond 2.19.82, the last released development version, is now
>> available in macports.
>
> Just curious - why should one use the macports version instead of
> the binary provided by lilypond.org?
There are at least two reasons.
* It seamlessly integrates into macports, which means it can
On 12/1/2018 3:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It seamlessly integrates into macports, which means it can be easily
installed with `port install lilypond-devel'. It can be also easily
removed with a similar command.
How hard would it be to get LilyPond into the macOS App Store?
--
Karlin Hi
> On 1 Dec 2018, at 22:19, Karlin High wrote:
>
> On 12/1/2018 3:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> It seamlessly integrates into macports, which means it can be easily
>> installed with `port install lilypond-devel'. It can be also easily
>> removed with a similar command.
>
> How hard would
Karlin High writes:
> On 12/1/2018 3:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> It seamlessly integrates into macports, which means it can be easily
>>installed with `port install lilypond-devel'. It can be also easily
>>removed with a similar command.
>
> How hard would it be to get LilyPond into
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 23:30, Michael Hendry
wrote:
> > On 1 Dec 2018, at 22:19, Karlin High wrote:
> >
> > On 12/1/2018 3:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> It seamlessly integrates into macports, which means it can be easily
> >> installed with `port install lilypond-devel'. It can be also ea
> On 1 Dec 2018, at 22:54, Sven Axelsson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 23:30, Michael Hendry wrote:
> > On 1 Dec 2018, at 22:19, Karlin High wrote:
> >
> > On 12/1/2018 3:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> It seamlessly integrates into macports, which means it can be easily
> >> installed
On 12/1/18, 1:22 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Richard Shann"
wrote:
It is probably a very small thing, but it would be good if you could
improve the SVG output with regard to the use of "current color" which
Lily outputs as the default foreground color rather than black. There
Having glyph styling through CSS is one of the goals of this project. In the
use of « currentColor, » it does seem to follow specifications. If an object
does not have a colour associated with it, it should leave the colour to the
viewer. However, the current SVG backend should be able to use CS
12 matches
Mail list logo
