This links to https://cloud.paconet.org/tesis/tesis.pdf, which is 404.
I think you mean https://paconet.org/tesis/tesis.pdf ?
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this adds my PhD thesis to the list in the web. Sorry for not
> uploading the patch in a more formal wa
Hi folks,
tomorrow morning I'll be leaving for my annual climbing trip in Italy
(not that I could afford it but there is no point in postponing all
living until death). If past years are an indication, I won't have
Internet access until Sunday evening (because when we'll arrive at the
pension to
Thanks, David.
Enjoy your climbing!
Carl
On 4/7/17 9:24 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
wrote:
>
>Hi folks,
>
>tomorrow morning I'll be leaving for my annual climbing trip in Italy
>(not that I could afford it but there is no point in postponing all
>living until death). If p
On 2017/04/05 15:55:38, david.nalesnik wrote:
On 2017/04/05 15:47:19, pkx166h wrote:
> Do you want this tested?
>
> I cannot see any tracker issue for this.
>
> Or is this just some work-in-progress design before you have a patch
for
testing
> proper?
>
> James
It's associated with Issue 427
On 2017/04/07 17:30:25, dak wrote:
On 2017/04/05 15:55:38, david.nalesnik wrote:
> On 2017/04/05 15:47:19, pkx166h wrote:
> > Do you want this tested?
> >
> > I cannot see any tracker issue for this.
> >
> > Or is this just some work-in-progress design before you have a
patch for
> testing
> >
On 2017/04/07 18:27:25, david.nalesnik wrote:
I see no way to make a context property holding exceptions work with
the system
in place. (Which is why I set the patch to needs work.)
I'll work on putting an override system in place.
Ugh. I actually don't have all that good of an idea jus
On 05/04/2017 17:43, James wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:13:43 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 05/04/2017 10:27, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/320830043/
Detection is fine, but another piece is missing (tested on 2.19.58) :
This is not current master.
David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM
> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not
> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or
> \voicings instead, possibly making for nicer compounds like that.
>
> I mean, something like
>
> \voi
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM
>
>> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not
>> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or
>> \voicings instead, possibly making for nicer compounds like that.
>>
>
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM
>
>> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not
>> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or
>> \voicings instead, possibly making for nicer compounds like that.
>>
>
2017-04-07 17:24 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> tomorrow morning I'll be leaving for my annual climbing trip in Italy
> (not that I could afford it but there is no point in postponing all
> living until death). If past years are an indication, I won't have
> Internet access until Sund
Am 07.04.2017 um 22:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM
>>
>>> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not
>>> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or
>>> \voicings inste
David Kastrup wrote Friday, April 07, 2017 9:07 PM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM
>>
>>> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not
>>> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or
>>> \voicing
On 4/7/17 2:15 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
wrote:
>"Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>>One argument in favor of \voicify would be that \voices sounds like
>setting a state rather than modifying a music expression. It would be a
>bit more talkative to say something like
>
>\withVo
14 matches
Mail list logo
