> Here's a caveat (but I'm not sure if that relates to the GSoC
> project). Some time ago I worked on a modified system to load the
> notation font from system installed fonts too, which would
> substantially reduce the amount of housekeeping when using
> alternative notation fonts. But I got stu
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/320360043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Am 11. März 2017 12:48:55 MEZ schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
>> Here's a caveat (but I'm not sure if that relates to the GSoC
>> project). Some time ago I worked on a modified system to load the
>> notation font from system installed fonts too, which would
>> substantially reduce the amount of houseke
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/314620043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
This subsection has always puzzled me a bit.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor-big-page#requirements-for-running-lilypond
If I were a user on Windows or MacOS I know I don't need any of this
software to 'run' LilyPond because, I assume, we provide everything in
th
