James Lowe writes:
> On 11/07/15 17:07, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Issue 4475 has been pushed about 3.5h ago to staging. I thought we
>> had a Patchy-staging run about every 2 hours? Does this mean that
>> there has been a failure?
>
> Yes or my Internet connection is broken! - although I thin
16:32:43 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
ccad67c0a33e9b5d6e63ec8072f229026c777490
16:33:01 Merged staging, now at:ccad67c0a33e9b5d6e63ec8072f229026c777490
16:33:02Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure
16:33:21Success:/tmp/
James Lowe writes:
> On 11/07/15 17:07, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Issue 4475 has been pushed about 3.5h ago to staging. I thought we
>> had a Patchy-staging run about every 2 hours? Does this mean that
>> there has been a failure?
>>
>> Problem is that I'm likely off in about an hour, and if
https://codereview.appspot.com/106320046/diff/1/Documentation/snippets/new/printing-bar-numbers-with-changing-regular-intervals.ly
File
Documentation/snippets/new/printing-bar-numbers-with-changing-regular-intervals.ly
(right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/106320046/diff/1/Documentation/snippe
On 2015/07/12 00:27:14, Dan Eble wrote:
lily/tie.cc:128: one_head = Semi_tie::head (item);
Whoops. This should have been Semi_tie::head (item, d).
I am almost sure this code is reachable only under conditions that are
detected as programming errors elsewhere. Therefore I am not going to
worry
I'm getting a failure to build GUB, as shown below:
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/mingw/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-
release-unstable/lily/lily-modules.cc: In member function 'void
Scm_module::import()':
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/mingw/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-
rele
Phil Holmes writes:
> I'm getting a failure to build GUB, as shown below:
>
> /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/mingw/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-
> release-unstable/lily/lily-modules.cc: In member function 'void
> Scm_module::import()':
> /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/mingw/src/lilypond-g
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Table Of Contents crash with negative first-page-number
Issue 4494
Let \with-link point to the physical page-number
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/
Affected files (+20, -11 lines):
M scm/define-markup-commands.scm
Index: scm/define
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode542
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:542: (+ table-page-number (+ 1 (* -1
first-page-num
Reviewers: ,
Description:
If anyone can explain that the lines I removed actually made sense,
please do.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/255110043/
Affected files (+0, -2 lines):
M lily/semi-tie-column.cc
M scm/define-grobs.scm
Index: lily/semi-tie-column.cc
diff --gi
On 2015/07/12 17:01:06, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode542
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:542: (+ tabl
On 2015/07/12 17:49:44, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> Do the links actually work when first-page-number is, say, 10?
yes
> If so, did they
> not work before?
No, it was broken.
Well, then we probably have to thank Ghostscript for bringing this
long-standing problem to our attention.
It ma
On 2015/07/12 18:09:03, dak wrote:
On 2015/07/12 17:49:44, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> > Do the links actually work when first-page-number is, say, 10?
>
> yes
>
> > If so, did they
> > not work before?
>
> No, it was broken.
Well, then we probably have to thank Ghostscript for bringing this
On 2015/07/12 20:58:41, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2015/07/12 18:09:03, dak wrote:
> It may be worth trying if this makes the rather awkward fix for
issue 3388
> unnecessary, but I would guess that the problem is likely
sufficiently
different
> that that fix is still needed.
As far as I
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Well, the consideration for choosing a hyphenated name here instead of
camel case (namely property-override instead of propertyOverride) was
that the main usage was from Scheme anyway. But since it is a proper
music function nevertheless, I now tend to think that I should n
On 2015/07/12 17:49:44, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2015/07/12 17:01:06, dak wrote:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
> File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#
On 2015/07/12 23:39:52, dak wrote:
On 2015/07/12 17:49:44, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> On 2015/07/12 17:01:06, dak wrote:
> >
https://codereview.appspot.com/258740043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
> > File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
> >
> >
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/
that's fabulous, thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/251130043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
18 matches
Mail list logo
