Keith OHara writes:
> Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes:
>
>> Keith wrote:
>> > I suggest looking over the existing partcombine bugs, and orchestral
>> > scores, to see what problems generally need solving.
>
>> If there's anything I can do to help (without understanding more than
>> basic Sch
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
December 5th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=pat
Hi folks,
I just stumbled over
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-12/msg00187.html and
http://lilypond.org/website/gsoc-2012.html
I think my first sentence in the thread starter is even more true today.
I thought we could *hide* that GSoC 2012 page from the website instead
of
>>> I changed mingw.org's mingw-runtime to mingw-64 (32-bit).
>>> Then an error didn't occur and correct test.pdf was generated.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/binutils-2.24
>>>
>>> I may pull request if you request it.
>>>
>>> Further, even if the runtime is mingw-w64,
>>> bad_all
Masamichi HOSODA writes:
I changed mingw.org's mingw-runtime to mingw-64 (32-bit).
Then an error didn't occur and correct test.pdf was generated.
https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/binutils-2.24
I may pull request if you request it.
Further, even if th
On 02/12/14 14:28, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi folks,
I just stumbled over
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-12/msg00187.html and
http://lilypond.org/website/gsoc-2012.html
I think my first sentence in the thread starter is even more true today.
I thought we could *hide* that GSoC 2
David Kastrup wrote
> So I think we should likely reorder the English notename language such
> that the default output is the abbreviated form. Thoughts?
+1 That makes good sense to me.
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Another-English-notename-iss
Urs Liska wrote
> I just stumbled over
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-12/msg00187.html and
> http://lilypond.org/website/gsoc-2012.html
I still think it would be best to convert it into a generic GSOC page and
start the process of updating it for the next round which will
Am 02.12.2014 16:58, schrieb Paul Morris:
Urs Liska wrote
I just stumbled over
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-12/msg00187.html and
http://lilypond.org/website/gsoc-2012.html
I still think it would be best to convert it into a generic GSOC page and
start the process of up
https://codereview.appspot.com/177640043/diff/20001/mf/feta-rests.mf
File mf/feta-rests.mf (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/177640043/diff/20001/mf/feta-rests.mf#newcode438
mf/feta-rests.mf:438: rest := rest xscaled -1 shifted (w, 0);
Please use tabs for indentation
https://codereview.ap
Reviewers: ,
Description:
I have some books which use an on-the-fly markup procedure that refers
to a context in a closure. I now question the wisdom of this, but
that's what I have. In certain circumstances (when processing a certain
book with hundreds of scores, but not other books with tens
11 matches
Mail list logo