Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> That problem was std-vector not including the config.h file.
>
> My question is if we are still supporting systems for which configure
> does not set HAVE_STD_VECTOR_DATA.
The problem became apparent only because LLVM needed a _different_ value
of HAVE_STD_VECTOR_DATA
Hi,
I recently made some posts to this mailing list
(lilypond-devel) while unsubscribed. They showed up on the
lists.gnu.org archive, but possibly they were not
distributed to the list subscribers.
I've subscribed again, and I'm trying to make sure that this
post actually gets delivered; can s
Am 22.05.2014 12:08, schrieb Mark Polesky:
Hi,
I recently made some posts to this mailing list
(lilypond-devel) while unsubscribed. They showed up on the
lists.gnu.org archive, but possibly they were not
distributed to the list subscribers.
I've subscribed again, and I'm trying to make sure th
Dear Mark,
2014-05-22 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Polesky :
> can someone reply if this message lands in an inbox?
I received both this message...
> The thread starts here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-05/msg00098.html
... and the ones in this thread.
However, all these mes
2014-05-22 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Polesky :
> Hi,
>
> I recently made some posts to this mailing list
> (lilypond-devel) while unsubscribed. They showed up on the
> lists.gnu.org archive, but possibly they were not
> distributed to the list subscribers.
>
> I've subscribed again, and I'm trying to
On 22/05/14 11:08, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently made some posts to this mailing list
> (lilypond-devel) while unsubscribed. They showed up on the
> lists.gnu.org archive, but possibly they were not
> distributed to the list subscribers.
>
> I've subscribed again, and I'm trying to ma
David Kastrup wrote
>> How about "\adorn"?
>
> Less cute: \retouch.
I like \retouch better than \adorn. So far my favorites (for what it's
worth) are \redraw, \substitute, and \replace, since I think they convey
well what the user is doing, from the user's perspective. I think you're
right that
Paul Morris writes:
> David Kastrup wrote
>>> How about "\adorn"?
>>
>> Less cute: \retouch.
>
> I like \retouch better than \adorn. So far my favorites (for what it's
> worth) are \redraw, \substitute, and \replace, since I think they convey
> well what the user is doing, from the user's persp
David Kastrup wrote
> "\redraw" implies overdrawing, and the others don't carry a "visual"
> connotation. True, neither does \omit.
>
> Apart from "replace" being more likely to collide with other uses, the
> order of arguments would favor substitute as its grammar can be
>
> substitute xxx
In the CG section called "Building a single document", an
example is given for generating one manual in pdf:
cd build/
cd Documentation/
touch ../../Documentation/contributor.texi
make out=www out-www/contributor.pdf
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/generating-docum
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:07:32PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> make out=www out-www/contributor.pdf
>
> I want to do the same thing for an html document (as opposed
> to pdf), like notation/index.html. How can I do that?
Isn't it just
make out=www out-www/contributor/index.html
?
- Graha
11 matches
Mail list logo
