Hi,
is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
If I'm not mistaken a local website build won't show me the result of a
ponding, isn't it?
So what to do with a ponding patch? Simply try to mimick the existing
ones and hope the patch will pass? Rather not, isn't it?
Hello,
On 2 May 2014 16:12, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
> If I'm not mistaken a local website build won't show me the result of a
> ponding, isn't it?
>
I cannot answer that, I rarely build the website locally.
>
> So what to
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska"
To: "LilyPond Development Team"
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:12 PM
Subject: Test Ponding tweets
Hi,
is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
If I'm not mistaken a local website build won't show me the result of a
po
Am 02.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska"
To: "LilyPond Development Team"
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:12 PM
Subject: Test Ponding tweets
Hi,
is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
If I'm not mistaken a local websi
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 02.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
>> - Original Message - From: "Urs Liska"
>> To: "LilyPond Development Team"
>> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:12 PM
>> Subject: Test Ponding tweets
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for cor
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Two minor fixes in existing pondings
1) Indentation fix in ponding
2) Fix typo in ponding
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/94070043/
Affected files (+3, -3 lines):
M Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml
Index: Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml
Reviewers: ,
Description:
New ponding: Urs Liska Berne lectures
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/94960043/
Affected files (+7, -0 lines):
M Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml
Index: Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml
diff --git a/Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml
b
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "LilyPond Development Team"
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Test Ponding tweets
Am 02.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska"
To: "LilyPond Development
Updated patch, now applied to master.
Originally I had chained two sequential patches to one branch.
https://codereview.appspot.com/94960043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
