PATCHES: Countdown - April 7th 06:00 GMT

Hello, 3893

Change staff changes pitch notation

% When changing staff the relative pitch notation is changed into % absolute notation \version 2.18.0 % this is not correct: \relative c'' \tuplet 5/4 {e32 g e d c} \change Staff = "down" {a g e c} % this is correct: \relative c'' \tuplet 5/4 {e32 g e d c} \change Staff = "down" \relativ

Re: Change staff changes pitch notation

- Original Message - From: "Gerard L. Maters" To: Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 10:25 AM Subject: Change staff changes pitch notation % When changing staff the relative pitch notation is changed into % absolute notation \version 2.18.0 % this is not correct: \relative c'' \tup

Serious feedback and improvement headroom

Hi devels, I think I have some serious feedback to share, and it may lead to even more feedback and input. This week I had the opportunity to present myself, LilyPond and my "plain text workflows" topic to a significant group of the Henle staff. In order not to whet your appetite too much: C

Amadeus resources

Hi all, as promised I can share the Amadeus manual: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49478835/amadeus/amadeus_manual_en.pdf and a screenshot: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49478835/amadeus/amadeus_bildschirm.png Both are non-permanent links and may be down at any time in the future. T

Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom

Urs Liska writes: > The most interesting aspect of the meeting was that Henle's (only) > in-house engraver was present too, and this may become a fruitful > contact. He is using Amadeus, a Linux (!) program he bought for 20.000 > Euro in 1988 Well, in 1988 there was no Euro. I presume that you

Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom

Am 04.04.2014 14:24, schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska writes: > >> The most interesting aspect of the meeting was that Henle's (only) >> in-house engraver was present too, and this may become a fruitful >> contact. He is using Amadeus, a Linux (!) program he bought for 20.000 >> Euro in 1988 >

Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom

Am 04.04.2014 15:04, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: I don't suggest any significant changes in our input syntax. But I >>want to point out that editing efficiency on that level_is_ an issue >>we should keep taking into account when it comes to professional >>work. >Current LilyPond input tools, edito

Partial compilation (was: Serious feedback and improvement headroom)

Am 04.04.2014 15:04, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: What I would vote for very much is an option to recalculate the >>current system only, but with outputting the complete score anyway >>(however it may be determined what "current" is). This should work in >>many cases when a modification doesn't chang

Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom

*Von:* David Kastrup *Gesendet:* Fri Apr 04 14:24:28 MESZ 2014 *An:* Urs Liska *CC:* LilyPond Development Team , "Jan Warchoł" *Betreff:* [SPAM] Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom Urs Liska writes: The mo

Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom

Urs Liska writes: >> This becomes particularly important when it comes to tweaking >> output. He wrote (my translation): "My first look at LilyPond [through >> my presentation and a follow-up email] shows similarities to Amadeus, >> but OTOH I have the suspicion that the operation

Re: Partial compilation

On 04.04.2014 16:32, Urs Liska wrote: > But lilypond probably could assist a frontend with a map from musical >> flow to paper-flow. If the GUI knows that on page 3 are measures 27-42 >> and the front end tracks an action, where I modified one slur-shape or >> one pitch, the front-end could trigger

Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom

Hi Urs, really interesting! I have just some short comments. Am 2014-04-04 um 16:43 schrieb Urs Liska : > treble F 4/4 is the equivalent to > > \clef treble > \key f \major > \time 4/4 > > (,9 ),10_a140140h30 > seems to be an equivalent to a \shape invocation > > Personally I think that L