Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 04:41:46PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
>> I think the following would be a good 1-2 punch approach for the
>> current development cycle: First, upgrade python in GUB and make
>> sure we can build current dev and stable branches of lilypond from
>>
Hi Jonathan
Nice to see you back. I can sympathize with your RSI wrist problems - I too
have to be quite careful how much computer work I do for the same reason.
Your textbook looks really interesting, not only for the use of LilyPond and
the inclusion of mp3 files but also for sight of the bo
Am 16.03.2014 20:36, schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Hi folks,
it's been a long time since I was actively contributing to Lilypond
documentation but I have been lurking and following certain threads in the dev
mailing list. I'm still around but it still have wrist problems, helped quite a
bit by some
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I was of the opinion that GUB already uses Python 2.6?
>
>
GUB master at https://github.com/gperciva/gub (the current "official" home)
definitely does not use python 2.6. It ships python 2.4.5
If you are using GUB master at https://github.c
Julien Rioux writes:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> I was of the opinion that GUB already uses Python 2.6?
>>
>>
> GUB master at https://github.com/gperciva/gub (the current "official" home)
> definitely does not use python 2.6. It ships python 2.4.5
Oh. I thought
On 03/18/2014 03:30 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 16.03.2014 20:36, schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
>
> That looks great!
>
> One comment: I'd consider writing some common header to the ly
> files, explaining what it is what you see in the browser (they are
> LilyPond files, they come from the book, you can g
LGTM
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/74540044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:24 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Julien Rioux writes:
>
> > (BTW moving GUB to a user-agnostic home such as
> > https://github.com/lilypond
>
> > would make sense to avoid such confusion. After Jan went mostly
> > inactive, Graham took over as the "official" home, but he
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 04:41:46PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
> > I think the following would be a good 1-2 punch approach for the
> > current development cycle: First, upgrade python in GUB and make
> > sure we can build current dev and st
Julien Rioux writes:
> If you are keen on it, why not? Not sure if it's worth the trouble,
> though: Maybe more visibility would bring GUB more workers, and in
> that vein endorsement by a big player would be a boost. Unfortunately,
> I'm not sure GUB has a strong significance anymore. With no
>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Julien Rioux writes:
>
> > The current hosting situation isn't bad that we need to take such
> > important actions with savannah. With github, we already have hosting,
> > a platform for contribution and review comments, and relatively str
Julien Rioux writes:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Julien Rioux writes:
>>
>> > The current hosting situation isn't bad that we need to take such
>> > important actions with savannah. With github, we already have hosting,
>> > a platform for contribution and revi
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> That's not quite the same as "we already have hosting, a platform for
> contribution and review comments". Everything beyond the content in
> private repositories is gone if a project is removed. And "we have" is
> a bit of a euphemism
Julien Rioux writes:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> That's not quite the same as "we already have hosting, a platform for
>> contribution and review comments". Everything beyond the content in
>> private repositories is gone if a project is removed. And "we ha
I have forked gub and have been working on it for a while now.
https://github.com/jjbenham/gub
It is very different now from https://github.com/gperciva/gub and the main
master. I don't know how to contribute changes unless via per file basis.
Then each patch would need to be tested. I have added
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I have forked gub and have been working on it for a while now.
>
> https://github.com/jjbenham/gub
>
> It is very different now from https://github.com/gperciva/gub and the
> main master. I don't know how to contribute changes unless via p
Hello... I'm just starting out peering into lilypond code.. so bare with me
I'm trying to update the script listed here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-11/msg00024.html
The main bit I'm trying to update is here:
(let* ((question (read client))
Hello... I'm just starting out peering into lilypond code.. so bare with me
I'm trying to update the script listed here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-11/msg00024.html
The main bit I'm trying to update is here:
(let* ((question (read client))
18 matches
Mail list logo
