Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł writes: > lol of the month! Some time ago I've discovered a user named > 'lilypond' on GitHub, who seemed to be pretty inactive. I thought > that it would be nice to have a github organization with this name, > and i was going to contact him... but it turned out that the account >

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/16 David Kastrup : > Janek Warchoł writes: > >> lol of the month! Some time ago I've discovered a user named >> 'lilypond' on GitHub, who seemed to be pretty inactive. I thought >> that it would be nice to have a github organization with this name, >> and i was going to contact him... but

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/16 Janek Warchoł : > 2013/9/16 David Kastrup : >> Janek Warchoł writes: >> >>> lol of the month! Some time ago I've discovered a user named >>> 'lilypond' on GitHub, who seemed to be pretty inactive. I thought >>> that it would be nice to have a github organization with this name, >>> and

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł writes: > 2013/9/16 Janek Warchoł : >> 2013/9/16 David Kastrup : >>> Janek Warchoł writes: >>> lol of the month! Some time ago I've discovered a user named 'lilypond' on GitHub, who seemed to be pretty inactive. I thought that it would be nice to have a github orga

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > What's wrong with GitHub, anyway? > > It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a > target for attacks), has its own "terms of service", may choose to > discontinue projects based on commercial criteria,

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi, in the meantime i saw Graham's email, so just a short reply: 2013/9/16 David Kastrup : > [github] can cause tool lock-in and so on, every tool can. In this case, i think that the degree of lock-in is small and probably negligible (as Graham said, git repositories are portable). Note that i

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/16 Graham Percival : > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> > What's wrong with GitHub, anyway? >> >> It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a >> target for attacks), has its own "terms of service", may choose to >> discontinue proj

Hello again

2013-09-16 Thread Francisco Vila
Folks, I have been 'missing' but I am working on translations again. I have read all mails and followed every commit done to our repo. Congratulations to you all team members, good work as always! Sorry for this long delay. Various duties eat my time but I am confident a complete update of manuals

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> > What's wrong with GitHub, anyway? >> >> It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a >> target for attacks), has its own "terms of service", may choose to >> discontinue proje

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł writes: > in the meantime i saw Graham's email, so just a short reply: > > 2013/9/16 David Kastrup : >> [github] can cause tool lock-in and so on, > > every tool can. In this case, i think that the degree of lock-in is > small and probably negligible (as Graham said, git repositori

Re: Issue 1321: Enhancement: add partcombineUp and partcombineDown functions (issue 13242056)

2013-09-16 Thread janek . lilypond
just a quick look, but LGTM. https://codereview.appspot.com/13242056/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Reminder: LilyPond meeting in Waltrop, Germany, 2013-09-20 to 2013-09-24

2013-09-16 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
2013/9/15 Janek Warchoł > Hi, > > 2013/9/14 David Kastrup : > > This is a reminder that next weekend, Sept 20th to 24th, there will be a > > LilyPond developer and user meeting in Waltrop, Germany. After the > > first attempt to schedule the meeting in August, we rescheduled in order > > to bett

what does the M mean on Rietveld?

2013-09-16 Thread Mark Polesky
what does the M mean on Rietveld? I couldn't find an answer in their docs. - Mark <>___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-16 Thread Urs Liska
David Kastrup schrieb: >Graham Percival writes: > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >>> > What's wrong with GitHub, anyway? >>> >>> It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to >be a >>> target for attacks), has its own "terms of service"

Issue 3557: Fix some grammar mistakes. (issue 13373054)

2013-09-16 Thread dak
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/13373054/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: what does the M mean on Rietveld?

2013-09-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/16 Mark Polesky : > what does the M mean on Rietveld? > I couldn't find an answer in their docs. I'd guess that M means Modified, A - Added. No idea what files without any letter would be. Janek ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu

changing size of \tempo marks

2013-09-16 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[2.17.26] Folks, it seems there isn't an easy possibility to change the size of \tempo marks globally. Have I missed something? This code { \tempo "abc" c''1 | \override MetronomeMark.font-size = #20 \override MetronomeMark.font-family = #'sans \tempo "abc" c''1 | } has