Whoah, Mike! I've understood your patch in first reading! Nice commit
message.
The spacing of system-star-text-interface implementing grobs used side
typo (system-start-text)
Also, we change the name of the list of elements used for alignment,
as elements should only be used for axis groups
In the last week it has become abundantly clear that the last-minute
attempt for reaching the conditions suitable for making a stable release
occured too late to arrive at a releasable state.
The work I scheduled for myself for arriving at such a state consisted
in dealing with several regression
David,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> In the last week it has become abundantly clear that the last-minute
> attempt for reaching the conditions suitable for making a stable release
> occured too late to arrive at a releasable state.
> []
> So a release process of 2
On 03/17/2013 06:47 PM, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
> And while above the staff dynamic brackets have the hook down.
As I said before, I'd have argued for that feature even in the absence of a
Ferneyhough example, as it makes musical/notational sense. But I think the
example settles it.
David Kastrup Monday, March 18, 2013 8:52 AM
>
> It turns out that the pent-up pressure to get forward-looking changes
> into the master branch that have transitory user interfaces or extensive
> changes of internals not exposed to sufficient testing is already too
> high to permit a prerelease p
I can't easily test this, but on the basis of the
reg tests - LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7564044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup Monday, March 18, 2013 8:52 AM
>>
>> It turns out that the pent-up pressure to get forward-looking changes
>> into the master branch that have transitory user interfaces or extensive
>> changes of internals not exposed to sufficient testing is already too
David Kastrup wrote Monday, March 18, 2013 11:14 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> David Kastrup Monday, March 18, 2013 8:52 AM
>>>
>>> It turns out that the pent-up pressure to get forward-looking changes
>>> into the master branch that have transitory user interfaces or extensive
>>> chang
On 2013/03/18 10:36:35, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I can't easily test this, but on the basis of the
reg tests - LGTM
Do you mean that i should improve the test file which is attached to
tracker issue?
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7564044/
___
l
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, March 18, 2013 11:14 AM
>
>> The way to do that is to bind people to their predictions of what can
>> and cannot be achieved in a certain amount of time by agreeing on a
>> timeline in advance and putting in deadlines for certain kinds of
>>
Reviewers: dak, MikeSol, J_lowe,
Message:
This is the part of Issue 3239 that introduced additional programming
errors. I hope that the explanation is clear.
Of course there is one fundamental question: maybe we shouldn't complain
about grobs with empty extents, and just silently assume that an
On 2013/03/18 13:05:15, janek wrote:
On 2013/03/18 10:36:35, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I can't easily test this, but on the basis of the
> reg tests - LGTM
Do you mean that i should improve the test file which is attached to
tracker
issue?
Janek
No, the test file looks fine. It's just th
Hi,
recently i've mixed several things together and made some mess. I
apologize fo that. Below i explain the situation so that you won't be
lost:
Issue 3239
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3239
https://codereview.appspot.com/7768043
Previous versions of this patch contained s
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/41001/input/regression/repeat-slur.ly
File input/regression/repeat-slur.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/41001/input/regression/repeat-slur.ly#newcode10
input/regression/repeat-slur.ly:10: "
This should be rather @code{\\breakSlu
https://codereview.appspot.com/7798045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7798045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2247
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2247: @end example
That's \relative wi
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:36 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Aligning lyrics at a point of time to notecolumns at the same point of time
> should not require associating voices.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> The
The most recent patch set copies direction from SlurEvents and
PhrasingSlurEvents, but this doesn't seem to work as intended (it fails
silently). Everything else is operational.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
This will be nice.
Notice that the Stanza number in
'input/regression/hara-kiri-stanza-number.ly' lost its alignment.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7574048/diff/1/scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm
File scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7574048/diff/1/scm/defin
18 matches
Mail list logo
