Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 01.08.2012 03:42, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
>> Updates:
>> Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
>>
>> Comment #56 on issue 1320 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement:
>> user-customizable barlines through a Scheme interface.
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/is
Pushed to staging as
84f4009c40f44b13e933dfaeefe474cf9ac88a59
Closing
http://codereview.appspot.com/6456047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2012/8/1 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> fiddling around with a new patch for issue 2646 I tried to integrate
>> default-parenthesize into another function.
>> The following returns an error when uncommenting \override
>> Score.ParenthesesItem #'font-size = #0 and applying i
On 31 juil. 2012, at 14:03, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>
>> Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM
>>
>>> \version "2.16.0"
>>> \score {
> ...
>>> \midi {}
>>> }
>>
>> Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layou
10:35:12 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
1c980a9906a7ea01b9f99487e75580f7232f2491
10:35:12 *** FAILED STEP ***
merge from staging
Command 'git branch test-master-lock origin/master' returned non-zero
exit status 128
fatal: A branch named 'test-master-loc
Copying to user list because of the LSR angle.
Graham Percival writes:
> ** Regressions
>
> (mostly copied from an email by Trevor)
>
> So far there have been c. 75 critical regressions under the
> current definition of ’critical’ since 2.14. All but one have been
> fixed, many of them promptly
Am 01.08.2012 09:51, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
Am 01.08.2012 03:42, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #56 on issue 1320 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement:
user-customizable barlines through a Scheme interface.
http:/
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Hohl"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 1320 in lilypond:
Enhancement:user-customizable barlines through a Scheme interface.
Am 01.08.2012 09:51, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:31:55PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> At the time the 2.16 branch will be cut, the versioning for the unstable
> branch will need to advance to 2.17 in order to maintain an ordered
> relation between version numbers and LilyPond language.
Do you mean 2.16 instead of 2
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:31:55PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> At the time the 2.16 branch will be cut, the versioning for the unstable
>> branch will need to advance to 2.17 in order to maintain an ordered
>> relation between version numbers and LilyPond language
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> >> What versioning should I be using for the release
> >> candidates? Numerically, one has the options to start with
> >>
> >> 2.15.95
> >
> > why not 2.15.42 ?
>
> Because the 2.16 branch is supposed t
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> >> What versioning should I be using for the release
>> >> candidates? Numerically, one has the options to start with
>> >>
>> >> 2.15.95
>> >
>> > why not 2.15.42 ?
>>
>>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:21:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> >> If it is non-operative, it should be either made operative or removed.
> >> There is no point dragging it along as purely dead weight we should not
> >> be using.
> >
> > Sure, patches appreciated.
>
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.21 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> Graham Percival writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> If it is non-operative, it should be either made operative or removed.
> >> There is no point dragging it along as purely dead wei
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:21:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> >> If it is non-operative, it should be either made operative or removed.
>> >> There is no point dragging it along as purely dead weight we should not
>> >> be using.
>> >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:15:34PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> I'm sometimes slow to react (up to one week for making a patch), but I'm
> willing to help with version number management in the build system if
> this definitely appears to be the route to go with.
Regardless of the question of hav
I've just pushed a couple of updates to staging based on incidental stuff
I've discovered and benchmarked over the last couple of days. One sets the
location of the binary to what we'd now expect for using .gdbinit. The
second is based on benchmarking with and without -jX CPU_COUNT=X for the
I have nothing to say other than seconding comments from Graham.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/1/make/lysdoc-vars.make
File make/lysdoc-vars.make (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/1/make/lysdoc-vars.make#oldcode10
make/lysdoc-vars.make:10: LILYPOND_BOOK_FLAGS += --
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> Regardless of the question of having a tuple of four values, it
> would be nice to support build numbers, i.e. 2.15.43-2:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=977
>
> This definitely requires work in both lil
- Original Message -
From:
To: ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Changes make test to allow output to be reviewed in a browser
(issue 6442068)
I have nothing to say other than seconding comments from Graham.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/
John Mandereau writes:
> Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
>> Regardless of the question of having a tuple of four values, it
>> would be nice to support build numbers, i.e. 2.15.43-2:
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=977
>>
>> This defi
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:36:14PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > Regardless of the question of having a tuple of four values, it
> > would be nice to support build numbers, i.e. 2.15.43-2:
> > http://code.google.com/p/lily
Graham Percival writes:
> Hmm. I can't answer this directly, but I'll pass along my
> considerations:
>
> - if you try to compile GUB on debian unstable (or any other
> recent distro), you will likely encounter odd compile failures.
> These are important to fix at some point in time (otherwi
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 19.26 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> Build numbers are not all that relevant for _us_ as far as I can tell.
> They distinguish different versions compiled from the _same_ canonical
> source (so they don't belong into our VERSION file at any rate).
> Changes may be
FYI
Werner
--- Begin Message ---
A new release, 20120731, is now available for download.
This time there is also a MS/Windows binary package available,
thanks to Matthew Petroff who provided it.
Regards,
Michał Nowakowski
---
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 18.08 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> Hmm. I can't answer this directly, but I'll pass along my
> considerations:
>
> - if you try to compile GUB on debian unstable (or any other
> recent distro), you will likely encounter odd compile failures.
> These are
Am 01.08.2012 13:02, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: "Marc Hohl"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 1320 in lilypond:
Enhancement:user-customizable barlines through a Scheme interface.
Am 01.08
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:10:26PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 18.08 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > The first step is to make it
> > work in "make website", which is infinitely easier than trying
> > to do anything in GUB. This is a relatively easy thi
Il giorno mar, 31/07/2012 alle 17.18 +0200, John Mandereau ha scritto:
> When lilypond-patchy-staging.py a.k.a. Patchy succesfully builds on MSH
> Paris Nord server, it now puts the docs on
>
> http://194.254.171.80/lilypond-web/master/
Update: thanks to Valentin, you can now (or within less than
29 matches
Mail list logo
