Re: LSR is now on 2.14

- Original Message - From: David Nalesnik To: Phil Holmes Cc: Thomas Morley ; lilypond-devel Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 8:29 PM Subject: Re: LSR is now on 2.14 Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: Sorry about the top post. Windows mail is

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

- Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" To: "lilypond-devel" Cc: "David Nalesnik" ; "bug-lilypond" Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:26 AM Subject: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr Hi, Seba just informed me that the "Contemp

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

Am 3. April 2012 10:27 schrieb Phil Holmes : > - Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" > > To: "lilypond-devel" > Cc: "David Nalesnik" ; "bug-lilypond" > > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:26 AM > Subject: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail > whenrunning the wh

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

- Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "lilypond-devel" ; "David Nalesnik" ; "bug-lilypond" Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 11:53 AM Subject: Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr Am 3. April 2012 10:27 s

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > > We need to check what the script is doing and how it responds to failing > snippets like this. I'm not in a position to do this right now, but let's > not forget it's there. I've put it on the tracker as > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/i

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:53:33PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > But there is a very basic problem: > If I test compiling the whole LSR and all is fine but compiling a > single file from LSR failes, means I can't trust my testing-results. > How can I continue the work? Having no chance to notice pr

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Hi David, I just checked our recent addings to the LSR. In unfretted-headword.ly I noticed the line: noflag = \once \override Flag #'style = #'no-flag could you change it to: noflag = \once \override Stem #'flag-style = #'no-flag ? Well, the noflag-Definition isn't used in the s

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Hi Harm, On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi David, > > I just checked our recent addings to the LSR. > > In unfretted-headword.ly I noticed the line: > noflag = \once \override Flag #'style = #'no-flag > > could you change it to: > noflag = \once \override

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Hi Phil, I just checked the snippets I added to the lsr-tarball as well as our recent lsr-addings against the snippets from `Documentation/snippets/new/' on http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=Documentation/snippets/new;h=cac0bba81f655a2666049823e7d21ec51bcd73cd;hb=2055f35c

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

- Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "David Nalesnik" ; "lilypond-devel" Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:24 PM Subject: Re: LSR is now on 2.14 Hi Phil, I just checked the snippets I added to the lsr-tarball as well as our recent lsr-addings against the

Fwd: Staging/Master Merge - James' Patchy

I might have some internet issues at home. Patchy hasn't pushed since midday or emailed until now. I cannot remember what the message is if it 'fails' to connect to the internet - I think it posts this generic message. I'll check when I get home, there are no commits I can see in master or staging

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

Am 3. April 2012 16:52 schrieb David Kastrup : > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: >> >>> >>> We need to check what the script is doing and how it responds to >>> failing snippets like this.  I'm not in a position to do this right >>> now, but let'

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Sebastiano's last mail: Am 3. April 2012 18:31 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna : > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > >> Am 3. April 2012 18:00 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna : >>> All new snippets compiled happily. Now it shold be impossible to insert >>> wrong snippets (the web interface

Re: Issue 2391 in lilypond: Add Appendix entry for Predefined Paper Sizes

Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait : On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic scaling results in disappearance of the standard paper sizes which now get only mentioned in an appendix. This appen

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

Thomas Morley writes: > Using > > #!/bin/bash > > for LILYFILE in *.ly > do > STEM=$(basename "$LILYFILE" .ly) > echo "running $LILYFILE..." > lilypond --format=png -ddelete-intermediate-files "$LILYFILE" >& "$STEM".txt > done > > (as for the whole lsr) works and it compiles!! > > Compiling

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

Am 3. April 2012 21:30 schrieb David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> Using >> >> #!/bin/bash >> >> for LILYFILE in *.ly >> do >>   STEM=$(basename "$LILYFILE" .ly) >>   echo "running $LILYFILE..." >>   lilypond --format=png -ddelete-intermediate-files "$LILYFILE" >& >> "$STEM".txt >> done

Re: my GSoC application - please review! (also, who will be my mentor?)

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > Looks good!  It's much more assertive and professional & it's an easier read > as well.  Good luck! The application should now be publicly visible here: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_warchol

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Am 3. April 2012 16:30 schrieb Phil Holmes : > My understanding is that, once a correct snippet is in the LSR, it should be > deleted from snippets/new.  What will then happen is that I will grab an > updated tarball of the snippets tagged with the docs tag and run makelsr. > These will then all be

Re: Issue 2391 in lilypond: Add Appendix entry for Predefined Paper Sizes

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:30:50PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait : > >On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > >>Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic > >>scaling results in disappearance

Re: Issue 2391 in lilypond: Add Appendix entry for Predefined Paper Sizes

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:30:50PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait : > >On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > >>Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic > >>scaling results in disappearance

Re: my GSoC application - please review! (also, who will be my mentor?)

On 4/3/12 3:17 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote: > >The application should now be publicly visible here: >http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_w >archol/1# > >Please note that i've changed the schedule, and also added a skill >evaluation as requested by GNU. I've also

Re: my GSoC application - please review! (also, who will be my mentor?)

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > I don't know that it makes any difference, but you should do > > s/thourough/thorough/ fixed. > Great job! Thanks! Janek ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

Re: change the size of the arpeggio arrows

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Paolo Prete wrote: > Hello, > > how can I change the size of the arpeggio (up and down) arrows? > The default size is really small I think it may be impossible (i.e. if you increase it's font-size, the size of the arpeggio zigzag will also increase). I agree t

Re: rall. and accel stopped working in articulate. (issue 5927044)

> "pkx166h" == pkx166h writes: pkx166h> Peter, this has passed our 'countdown' review, if you don't pkx166h> yet have push access you can email me a git-formatted patch pkx166h> and I can push it for you. OK here it is. >From ee64a711a9b046496eeef116a1e1a01fe4a0df2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200

PATCH: Countdown to 20120405

For 20:00 MDT Thursday April 5 Documentation: Issue 2416 : make doc documentation - remove description the need to touch files - R5967060 (this already has 2 LGTM, could probably be pushed wi

Patch push announcements

When a countdown completes, I mark the tracker item "patch-push" and Google dutifully sends the resulting email to lilypond-auto, where it formerly went to -devel. I wonder if the owners are getting the notification, and if so, how we handle those tracker items which do not have an owner? Ch

Re: Triggers X-extent calculation for NoteColumn before setting stem-begin-position (issue 5934050)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5934050/diff/7001/lily/stem.cc File lily/stem.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5934050/diff/7001/lily/stem.cc#newcode131 lily/stem.cc:131: Real stem_beg = internal_calc_stem_begin_position (me, false); On 2012/04/02 07:48:11, MikeSol wrote: On 2012/04/02 0