Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

Carl Sorensen writes: > On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, "no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com" > wrote: > >>Thank you for submitting "LilyPond" organization application to Google >>Summer of Code 2012. >>Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your organization's application >>at this time. >>We receive

Re: Postscript printer errors with rounded barlines?

Todd Lewis writes: > The work-around is to change /draw_round_box in > ps/music-drawing-routines.ps as indicated in prior emails to avoid > rectstroke with a 0.0 linewidth, the behavior of which is device > dependent. "Prior Emails"? Anyway, starting with version 2.15.31, the patch commit 4666

Re: GNU accepted for GSOC (was: application has been rejected)

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:16:10PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> I'll contact them asking to add us to their umbrella.  Any suggestions >> before i do this? > > Prepare a blurb in the same format as their existing ones. > >>  Shall i talk

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: > On 16/03/2012 5:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: >> >> There are a few organisations interesting for lilypond hackers: >> inkscape (to learn about svg), closure (to learn a scheme-like >> language), buildbot (could be helpful but we already have th

Re: Copy pdf docs to new website folder (issue 5507046)

On 2012/01/03 20:36:48, Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:31:54PM +, mailto:hashas...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry, didn't understand what you mean by "add issue 2166 to track this" It's not relevant unless you're going to be making other patches. If you are, read the "summar

Re: Hiding old website /web/install page (issue 5500069)

this rietveld issue can be closed. http://codereview.appspot.com/5500069/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

Hello, On 16 March 2012 21:30, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:28:21PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: >> On 16/03/2012 4:55 PM, Graham Percival wrote: >> >... although apparently that doesn't include a link to the actual >> >code.  huh. >> >https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-ext

Re: Postscript printer errors with rounded barlines?

David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > Todd Lewis email.unc.edu> writes: > > > The work-around [...] indicated in prior emails to avoid > > rectstroke with a 0.0 linewidth, > > "Prior Emails"? Here : The resulting patch solv

Re: Postscript printer errors with rounded barlines?

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 07:38:29PM +, Keith OHara wrote: > David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > > > "Prior Emails"? > > Here : > > The resulting patch solved the problem of thick barlines, but did not > make it into versi

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

I'm working with the University of Paris VIII to get a computer consecrated to the cause. Once that happens, we'll have a new patchy platform. It's also good to have that sorta institutional alliance when it comes to applying to stuff like GSoC. Cheers, MS On Mar 16, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Graham

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:03 PM, wrote: > I'm working with the University of Paris VIII to get a computer consecrated > to the cause.  Once that happens, we'll have a new patchy platform.  It's > also good to have that sorta institutional alliance when it comes to applying > to stuff like GSoC

Re: Doc: NR add predefined paper sizes to appendix (issue 5783075)

Reviewers: dak, Message: My new ammended comment in the git format patch seems to not have been included with git-cl --snip-- Issue 2391 Copied predefined paper size entries from scm/paper.scm as a seperate appendix entry in order to better document predefined paper sizes. Also revamped sectio