On Feb 16, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:08 AM, wrote:
>>> By the way, lilypond's fonts embed extra data in font tables (look for
>>
>> LILC and
>>>
>>> LILY in open-type-font.cc). That may be a better way to embed this
>>
>> information
>>>
>>> than
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:42 PM, m...@apollinemike.com <
m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:14 AM, m...@apollinemike.com <
> m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:40 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:42 PM, m...@apollinemike.com <
m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:14 AM, m...@apollinemike.com <
> m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:40 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
>
On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:28 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2012, at 3:40 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> What's with the translate_scale_rotate stuff? .
>>
>> That looks fishy. What are you trying to do here?
>
> Account for line thickness. I actually have no clue how thickne
On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:42 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:14 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:40 AM, joenee...@gmail.co
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:28 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2012, at 3:40 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What's with the translate_scale_rotate stuff? .
>>>
>>> That looks fishy. What are you trying to do here?
>>
>> Account for line thi
David Kastrup writes:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:28 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2012, at 3:40 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
What's with the translate_scale_rotate stuff? .
That looks fishy. What are you trying to d
Am 16.02.2012 22:53, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi Marc,
2012/2/14 Marc Hohl:
Hi Harm,
Do you want to bundle up your definitions in a patch
so they get included future versions of lilypond?
Thanks for your work on this!
Regards,
Marc
I don't know what I'm expected to do here and currently I've
On Fr., 17. Feb. 2012 08:47:19 CET, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> Note that this whole "slow down" thing is much less relevant now that it
> was before. My current benchmarks show a 0.2-2 second per minute
> slowdown depending on the file.
Most important: is the slow down linear in the score
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:09:44PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:54:39PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > "Check if the issue falls into any previous category given on the
> > relevant checklists in Bug Squad checklists. If in doubt, add a new
> > issue for a report."
> > (
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> On Fr., 17. Feb. 2012 08:47:19 CET, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>> Note that this whole "slow down" thing is much less relevant now that it
>> was before. My current benchmarks show a 0.2-2 second per minute
>> slowdown depending on the file.
>
> Most important:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5669047/diff/5001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5669047/diff/5001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode512
Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
This has been accepted; Pavel, please send the final patch to somebody
(not me) for pushing. Hopefully you have a mentor? Maybe Janek?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651077/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:21 PM
Subject: Doc: recommend setting ragged-last-bottom to false for large
scores(issue 5651077)
This has been accepted; Pavel, please send the final patch to somebody
(not me) for pushing. Hopefully you hav
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
>> This sounds wrong. Where does this data come from ultimately?
>>
>
> The svg files. I read them into lilypond and generate this informatin.
You mean the SVG fonts? The SVG files are generated by FF in the same
step as the OTF fil
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> I'd rather not introduce more fragility (cf the generated .scm files)
> into the build process which is complicated enough as it is. I think
> users can wait for another week if need be.
More like half a year. But I don't think it would be a good idea to
slate this f
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>>> This sounds wrong. Where does this data come from ultimately?
>>>
>>
>> The svg files. I read them into lilypond and generate this informatin.
>
> You mean the SVG fon
Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> writes:
> >> Attached is a very primitive patch which works for me.
> >
> > That patch looks like it would stop working the moment you also
> > install Guile 2.
>
> I don't think so, but admittedly I haven't tested it. The patch is
> bad, I know; it's just to tell people
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> It apparently picks it up from the host, and apparently dblatex is
> broken in ubuntu 10.4. (at least, broken to the extent of not
> installing a required package?)
I've put a check on the dblatex version number in configure.in, in
this w
I deleted my gub/ directory and did a fresh git clone.
Did cd gub && make bootstrap
Got the following:
building package: darwin-ppc::cross/gcc
*** Stage: download (cross/gcc, darwin-ppc)
*** Stage: compile (cross/gcc, darwin-ppc)
*** buffer overflow detected ***:
/home/carl/gub/target/darwin-p
Carl Sorensen writes:
> Did a Google search for this error message and found
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
>
>
> Which indicates it may be a problem with -fno-stack-protect
That's like saying a flood in the living room may be a problem with
insufficie
On 2/17/12 7:37 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> Did a Google search for this error message and found
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
>>
>>
>> Which indicates it may be a problem with -fno-stack-protect
>
>That's like saying a fl
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 2/17/12 7:37 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>>> Did a Google search for this error message and found
>>>
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Which indicates it may be a problem with -fno-stack
On 2/17/12 7:44 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 2/17/12 7:37 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>>Carl Sorensen writes:
>>>
Did a Google search for this error message and found
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 2/17/12 7:44 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>>> On 2/17/12 7:37 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>>
Carl Sorensen writes:
> Did a Google search for this error message and found
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-d
>> I don't think so, but admittedly I haven't tested it. The patch is
>> bad, I know; it's just to tell people what I have done to compile
>> lilypond with the `guile1' package from openSuSE factory.
>
> I've pushed a slightly modified version to staging. It improves the
> situation for distros t
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:53:35PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
> > I guess that's possible, but the gcc in GUB is 4.1.1, which I don't think
> > had that code generation bug.
>
> It didn't, but don't you need to bootstrap? I obviously don't know GUB.
GUB first builds
2012/2/16 Janek Warchoł
> What steps will you take to encourage students to interact with your
> project's community before, during and after the program?
>Before: we assing them a person (not necessarily the mentor) who
> will give them "a short tour". we also invite them to reviewing our
>
I've released release candidate 3. There always seems to be
confusion about this, so let's go over what this means:
- activity on master goes on as normal.
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, than translators,
who may merge with that if they want to and don't break
anything.
The
On 2/17/12 10:34 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:53:35PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>> > I guess that's possible, but the gcc in GUB is 4.1.1, which I don't
>>think
>> > had that code generation bug.
>>
>> It didn't, but don't you need to b
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:33:29PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >That said, I've never been able to build GUB on anything other
> >than ubuntu 10.04. Are you using 11.10 ? I've definitely failed
> >on that OS.
>
> Ubuntu 10.04, as implemented in lilydev. I've done it both as a VM and as
> a se
Quoting Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:21 PM
Subject: Doc: recommend setting ragged-last-bottom to false for large
scores(issue 5651077)
This has been accepted; Pavel, please send the final patch to somebody
(not me) for pushin
32 matches
Mail list logo
